Greentea wrote:
13/20. Not so good. I wish they gave you this kind of tests at diagnosis and not the stupid ones they give.
The diagnostic criteria doesn't say you need an impairment in the non-verbal language. For the social aspects category, you only need two of the four.
I think you're the one who mentioned something about taking a reading in the eyes test earlier. For that test, the average for HFA/AS vs. normal group is big enough and the standard deviation big enough that it can't be due to chance, and does point out a correlation for the two. However, it's not big enough to reliably tell very well which individuals are in which group. On the distribution of that eyes test, a lot of AS/HFA were in the range of normal people, and some normal people were in the range of AS/HFA mean. If you go to
http://autismresearchcentre.com/tests/e ... _adult.asp and click on (S. Baron-Cohen, S. Wheelwright and J. Hill, (2001)
The 'Reading the mind in the eyes' test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning autism
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42:241-252), go to page 245, it has the distribution. The mean for the AS/HFA group on that reading the eyes test is 21.9 and the standard deviation 6.6 (or a type of averaging for individuals deviating from that mean). When you look at the deviating, standard deviation, for the normal people, it's a lot less than that of the AS/HFA. If that test is all they rejected you on, I'd make a copy of that report and show it to one of the higher ups there and tell them you think there should be more extensive testing.
Although I didn't go in for a diagnosis, I heard that it's best to go into a developmental specialist who specializes in autism. Did you go to one of those, or just a doctor who doesn't specialize in it?