The Fool On the Hill
CockneyRebel
Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,275
Location: In my own little country
auntblabby wrote:
thanks to all with the theories. it turns out that this song has an "etymology" that is quite complex, but is rooted in a weird paranormal incident when paul was walking his dog [named martha] atop primrose hill overlooking london, and as he watched the sunrise, he noticed martha went missing. paul looked around for her when he encountered a strange man wearing a belted raincoat- the two exchanged pleasantries about the sublime view of the city atop the hill, then paul turned away from the man for an instant, and when he looked back the man was gone, which was strange because the nearest trees were hundreds of feet away and the man could not have run that far that fast.
so that is one part of the fool on the hill, the original impetus for lennon/mccartney to write it down on paper. the other part of the fool has to do with george and his veneration of the maharishi, "head in a cloud, the man of a thousand voices talking perfectly loud" [IOW the hindu religion has been referred as being made up "of thousands of gods/voices"]- and when george tried to get paul and john to share his interest, he was met with indifference ["but nobody ever hears him, or the sound he appears to make, and he never seems to notice..."], IOW john and paul weren't listening. so i am gathering that the maharishi was indeed the major part of the subject of "the fool on the hill."
ah, the creative process of creative people can seem mightily convoluted and impenetrable to more regular folk.
so that is one part of the fool on the hill, the original impetus for lennon/mccartney to write it down on paper. the other part of the fool has to do with george and his veneration of the maharishi, "head in a cloud, the man of a thousand voices talking perfectly loud" [IOW the hindu religion has been referred as being made up "of thousands of gods/voices"]- and when george tried to get paul and john to share his interest, he was met with indifference ["but nobody ever hears him, or the sound he appears to make, and he never seems to notice..."], IOW john and paul weren't listening. so i am gathering that the maharishi was indeed the major part of the subject of "the fool on the hill."
ah, the creative process of creative people can seem mightily convoluted and impenetrable to more regular folk.
Wow, that's very interesting.
_________________
"A flower falls, even though we love it; and a weed grows, even though we do not love it."
auntblabby wrote:
thanks to all with the theories. it turns out that this song has an "etymology" that is quite complex, but is rooted in a weird paranormal incident when paul was walking his dog [named martha] atop primrose hill overlooking london, and as he watched the sunrise, he noticed martha went missing. paul looked around for her when he encountered a strange man wearing a belted raincoat- the two exchanged pleasantries about the sublime view of the city atop the hill, then paul turned away from the man for an instant, and when he looked back the man was gone, which was strange because the nearest trees were hundreds of feet away and the man could not have run that far that fast.
Could have been an acid flashback, or an embellished account, he said cynically.
Quote:
so that is one part of the fool on the hill, the original impetus for lennon/mccartney to write it down on paper. the other part of the fool has to do with george and his veneration of the maharishi, "head in a cloud, the man of a thousand voices talking perfectly loud" [IOW the hindu religion has been referred as being made up "of thousands of gods/voices"]- and when george tried to get paul and john to share his interest, he was met with indifference ["but nobody ever hears him, or the sound he appears to make, and he never seems to notice..."], IOW john and paul weren't listening. so i am gathering that the maharishi was indeed the major part of the subject of "the fool on the hill."
ah, the creative process of creative people can seem mightily convoluted and impenetrable to more regular folk.
ah, the creative process of creative people can seem mightily convoluted and impenetrable to more regular folk.
Hmmm.......I once heard Macca on the radio talking about the White Album, and whenever they asked for a song's meaning, he usually ended up saying that most of it didn't really mean anything much. I think he often just collected elements of verbal imagery and spat it out as a random mixture in a lot of his songs. He'd just put it in there because it sounded good at the time. In his foreword to "A Spaniard In The Works," he says "none of it has to make sense, and if it raises a laugh then that's enough." That was about Lennon's book, but I think the same's true of his attitude to his own song lyrics. Neither of them liked too much analysis of their stuff, though they have admitted to meanings here and there.
It wasn't written by Lennon, though. It was written by Paul. Alistair Taylor talked about the incident that inspired Paul to write this song as well as the meaning Paul said it had.
_________________
"Let reason be your only sovereign." ~Wizard's Sixth Rule
I'm working my way up to Attending Crazy Taoist. For now, just call me Dr. Crazy Taoist.
pensieve wrote:
auntblabby wrote:
can somebody please tell me what that song was saying? what or who was it really talking about?
According to John Lennon the fool was Paul.
This was my theme song when I was nine. Yeah I still feel like it is.
I thought Paul was the walrus.
Anyway, I liked Sergio Mendes and Brazil 66's version of the song.
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
auntblabby
Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115,263
Location: the island of defective toy santas
