headgames wrote:
I'm fairly certain this is true to a certain degree even though they won't admit it.
Any one that doesn't conform to their (neurotypicals) version of "normal" is looked up differently and treated as such.
I would like to hear other's opinions on this belief.
I don't think so, no.
The first thing to remember I think, is that most people don't know what Aspergers is. When I've said that word to some they have said "What?" And they thought I said two words, with the first one a bad word for the human backside. Some have vaguely heard of autism but their only reference for that is usually "Rainman."
Most of them would use a word like "deviant" for some type of sexual deviant, and even that is probably too fancy a word for most people to use. I know they would not associate that type of a personality with autism. (Which, again, is the closest reference they have to Aspergers at all.)
As for the people on the spectrum they know without knowing they know them...They likely think they are shy. They might use the word "backward" or "awkward." But deviant? No.
NB: I realize you mean social deviant in the strictest sense, i.e. different from the norm. But the wording would be too strong for most to think or use, so, still no.