I can read facial expressions, im not an aspie?
Hi : )
I score highly in diagnosis, but also in facial expression tests- its not mutually exclusive. This is why AS is a spectrum disorder. Discovering you have AS is disorientating- im confident, sociable- things which seem contradictory to the stereotype of AS. I also struggled with the whole 'but AS is x and i dont do that!!' thing at first : )
It does vary though- most of the time im laser sharp in understanding others' emotions- sometimes i struggle, sometimes im 100% oblivious even when told. It varies from day to day, rather than circumstance. I think of my AS like malaria- sometimes it really knocks me down, othertimes i can hide it so youd never guess on meeting me i have it.
After you discover you have AS the next thing is even more overwhealming- figuring out where you are on the spectrum. I found out i have AS over 4 yrs ago; i still realise new things each week.
Oddly, despite all the hypochrondria online about health in general, i was told by an AS expert that something like 95% of the people she sees who think they have AS go on to gain confirmation via diagnosis! Its not just confined to maths ability, social anxiety, or social awkwardness etc: which is how id stereotyped it to myself. theres a panolpy of symptoms going back through our lives which corroborate the suspicion that its all AS related. since its a spectrum, you can be diagnosed, but have none of the more stereotypical aspects.
Ive got extreme sensory issues, but im terrible at maths, tech & science. My working memory (short term ability to hold several things in mind simultaniously) is awful, but ive got idetic/photographic memory sometimes. I can talk for hours, other times im literally mute.
Theres no logic~ you may have none if the things you *expect* AS to be, or things which seem like mind boggling contradictions!
Good luck with working out your 'things' : )
The first time I did this "mind in the eye" test, it was very hard for me. Aside from a few obvious ones, most of the expressions looked just neutral to me. But I plowed through, and found analytical ways to guess the answers- (analytical guessing is different from actually knowing what you're seeing). In that first test, I scored somewhere in the "Aspie" section. However, I was intrigued with the test, and facial expressions, and over time I took many more facial tests, mostly here on Wrong Planet. As time went on, I got better and better. With the last test I took, I got a score *higher* than the average NT, and it was written "you are obviously highly empathetic and can easily read the feelings of others"!
Which is way off base. It's different looking at a picture and staring for a long time at a frozen expression, and not only that, you have 4 possibilities to choose from! (If I had to conjure up the answers myself I think I'd do much worse). I know I must be missing things in real life, because I often have trouble figuring out the subtle expressions and social subtext in movies, even though I can rewind and watch things over and over again. I think a social situation in it's entirety is much more difficult; first off, you're not focusing on a single still life, but trying to figure out the whole situation at once. Another problem I think I have in real life is I'm often not looking in the right place to pick up on micro-expressions......and even if I were, there's so much other stuff to think about, I think I would still miss stuff.
So, in other words, I think you can learn how to do the test well. But that doesn't necessarily translate at all in the real world.
_________________
"death is the road to awe"
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
i have a good understanding of non literal language but i am diagnosed HF autistic.
Some nice feminine eyes in that test.
1st time
Results:
Your score: 28
A typical score is in the range 22-30. If you scored over 30,
you are very accurate at decoding a person's facial expressions
around their eyes. A score under 22 indicates you find this quite difficult.
The correct answers for the ones you missed are:
1: playful
6: fantasizing
11: regretful
12: sceptical
13: anticipating
17: doubtful
20: friendly
29: reflective
Im a bit tired taking the test and I'm amazed I missed so many.
Last edited by answeraspergers on 23 Jan 2013, 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I score highly in diagnosis, but also in facial expression tests- its not mutually exclusive. This is why AS is a spectrum disorder. Discovering you have AS is disorientating- im confident, sociable- things which seem contradictory to the stereotype of AS. I also struggled with the whole 'but AS is x and i dont do that!!' thing at first : )
It does vary though- most of the time im laser sharp in understanding others' emotions- sometimes i struggle, sometimes im 100% oblivious even when told. It varies from day to day, rather than circumstance. I think of my AS like malaria- sometimes it really knocks me down, othertimes i can hide it so youd never guess on meeting me i have it.
After you discover you have AS the next thing is even more overwhealming- figuring out where you are on the spectrum. I found out i have AS over 4 yrs ago; i still realise new things each week.
Oddly, despite all the hypochrondria online about health in general, i was told by an AS expert that something like 95% of the people she sees who think they have AS go on to gain confirmation via diagnosis! Its not just confined to maths ability, social anxiety, or social awkwardness etc: which is how id stereotyped it to myself. theres a panolpy of symptoms going back through our lives which corroborate the suspicion that its all AS related. since its a spectrum, you can be diagnosed, but have none of the more stereotypical aspects.
Ive got extreme sensory issues, but im terrible at maths, tech & science. My working memory (short term ability to hold several things in mind simultaniously) is awful, but ive got idetic/photographic memory sometimes. I can talk for hours, other times im literally mute.
Theres no logic~ you may have none if the things you *expect* AS to be, or things which seem like mind boggling contradictions!
Good luck with working out your 'things' : )
Hello
_________________
Your Aspie score: 160 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 57 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
So, in other words, I think you can learn how to do the test well. But that doesn't necessarily translate at all in the real world.
I admit, when i took the Mind's eye test, most of the time i guessed what the facial expression was not as a process of elimination i chose the facial expression most resembling what i thought the person to be portraying rather than directing choosing an answer. And some of them i flat out guess and i guess correctly.
_________________
Your Aspie score: 160 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 57 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
That would be an interesting test to take.
_________________
Your Aspie score: 160 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 57 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
According to some folks they say the DSM 5 will make HF autistic people and aspergers people one and the same .
_________________
Your Aspie score: 160 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 57 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie
This would be much more like real life. Even better if they also didn't make it multiple choice! I have a system for multiple choice tests: there's usually one answer that's obviously wrong, so you can eliminate that. Then there's usually another answer that doesn't quite fit if you think about it. Usually the two remaining answers are kind of similar to each other, and you have to then figure out which one it's more likely to be. This seems to be generally how multiple choice tests are designed. This has been my system......I've faked it through many a multiple choice test in the past!
_________________
"death is the road to awe"
I got a 20 on the eyes test, a score that is below average even for aspies, which was extremely shocking to me because I actually consider myself to be pretty good at reading faces. But I think that's the thing, though: I'm good at reading whole faces, not just the eyes. I remember getting actually quite irritated and wanting to shake my monitor and scream, "Just show me a little more of the face and I've totally got this!! Argh!!"
With just the eyes alone, it looked like a lot of them were just "thinking about something," so I put that a lot.
So apparently I am terrible at reading just the eyes, but I still consider myself good at faces. Good thing I don't live in a country where people wear face clothes all the time!
Or maybe the test is just bogus. ![]()
I'm no therapist, but I think it's worth noting that the DSM-IV criteria doesn't explicitly mention the inability to read facial expressions. It discusses "marked impairments in the use of multiple non-verbal behaviors", which I take to mean that you may have difficulty reading others' facial expressions, tone of voice, body language, etc..., or you may have difficulty using non-verbal cues--or you may even have a hard time with both.
Here's another test--unlike the Mind in the Eyes test, the multiple choices you have to pick from don't change throughout the test:
http://www.neurodiversity.com/nvc/index.html
Last edited by FishStickNick on 25 Jan 2013, 2:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
According to some folks they say the DSM 5 will make HF autistic people and aspergers people one and the same .
Well, the DSM V... but it doesn't mean that there are still not some differences left.
The DSM V is not scientific, it's just a diagnostic system and that's all it wants to be. Out of the diagnostic fiew the ASD-thing makes a lot of sence, out of the scientific view they still don't know 100% sure, but know even if it's possible some day, that they can't devide the spectrum correctly at the moment.
_________________
"I'm astounded by people who want to 'know' the universe when it's hard enough to find your way around Chinatown." - Woody Allen
http://www.neurodiversity.com/nvc/index.html
correct: 14 incorrect: 9
hit rate: 61%
Lower percentage accurate than my mind in the eyes score. I kept mixing up contempt and disgust, and sometimes fear with sadness or surprise.
Wonder how NTs do on this one? Given that it's by Paul Ekman, who is into lie-detecting and such, this may be a test designed to be hard even for NTs.
Have you tried some other related tests?
If you're 30 years old, it's quite likely that you have learned many facial expressions already.
I think many researchers still haven't realized that autism (of any kind) doesn't just disappear after childhood, though the original symptoms may become less obvious.
Here's another test--unlike the Mind in the Eyes test, the multiple choices you have to pick from don't change throughout the test:
http://www.neurodiversity.com/nvc/index.html
Oh, this test was really hard for me. Except for a few obvious ones like "happy" and "sad", I find myself looking at the faces, thinking "no clue", then I look at the possibilities for answers and make a logical guess. It seems I have a problem reading reading different forms of anger; and what's the difference between "contempt" and "disgust" anyway- aren't they basically the same thing?
_________________
"death is the road to awe"

