Neurotypical Disorder (ND)
I have a few points:
- In a large set, if a small portion is different from the rest, that small portion is considered abnormal on account of it being small. We ASDs are a relatively small portion of all of humanity, therefore we are the disorder. Normal is defined by the majority, by definition.
- There are many people who have flawed reasoning and logic. While autistics may be less misled by emotional fallacies, and be more interested in science than average people are, I've seen no evidence for an inherently more scientific/skeptical/logical way of thinking.
- Cooking of course causes many chemical reactions in food. What else would cause the change in colour and taste?
- Saying NTs have the disorder and not us seems to have very few practical consequences, so why bother with such semantics? Regardless of who has what, they're the majority we'll have to work with.
- In a large set, if a small portion is different from the rest, that small portion is considered abnormal on account of it being small. We ASDs are a relatively small portion of all of humanity, therefore we are the disorder. Normal is defined by the majority, by definition.
- There are many people who have flawed reasoning and logic. While autistics may be less misled by emotional fallacies, and be more interested in science than average people are, I've seen no evidence for an inherently more scientific/skeptical/logical way of thinking.
- Cooking of course causes many chemical reactions in food. What else would cause the change in colour and taste?
- Saying NTs have the disorder and not us seems to have very few practical consequences, so why bother with such semantics? Regardless of who has what, they're the majority we'll have to work with.
Majority Rules, Minority Rights
By which I mean the Majority Rules the Rights of the Minorities, for good or bad
