Who_Am_I wrote:
The term "autistic behaviours", and other related terms such as "stimming behaviours", makes me angry. I'm not even quite sure of how to express why this is so, but the gist of it is:
1. The term "behaviours" seems to imply that the behaviours are just put on for no reason.
2. NTs don't have "behaviours", they have things they do.
3. The term suggests that so-called "behaviours" are just an autistic overlay on a hidden normal person, and if you remove them, then you'll get a normal person.
Does that make sense? Anyone else feel the same way?
I understand how you feel, but I think you're wrongly blaming the words for how they're used.
1. If you study bird behaviour, you don't just study what they do for now reason. Some people won't see there's a reason behind our autistic behaviour, and no wording is going to fix that.
2.. Autistic behaviours is an unusual choice of words, so I think it comes from psychology. As such it wouldn't be used outside of psychological stuff.
3. Again, this is the association you get from people using it that way, not something inherent in the words.
All in all it's people's ideas we need to change, not the words they use. The words take on the meaning behind them regardless of how often you change them.