Page 2 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Bodyles
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 808
Location: Southern California

23 Mar 2014, 10:19 pm

This is why the term 'allistic' to describe non-autistic people is better, imho, than neurotypical, since you certainly couldn't accurately describe a schizophrenic (or ADHD, etc.) person as neurotypical, however you could accurately describe them as allistic.

Just my 2 cents. :wink:



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

23 Mar 2014, 11:41 pm

Shield wrote:
I'm not sure that it's a numbers game in this case. There may be more non-nurotypical people (autism or otherwise) in the world but there's a social stigma attached. So people who don't qualify keep quiet.
Women are an example of a numerically superior minority. The numbers game didn't stop anti-female sexism.

Plus, with disabled and cognitively atypical people, they often divide-and-conquer, so that each small group has to fend for itself, rather than all of us working together. Rather than the 20% of all people who are disabled sticking together, we have the 1% who are autistic, and the 1% with this disability, and the 1% with that disability... and so on. All those little groups aren't very powerful on their own.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com