kraftiekortie wrote:
It seems like you're happy at your school; am I right?
Now: my viewpoint on "suburbs." Correct me if I'm wrong:
I grew up in the Bronx, and Queens, NYC. Still live in Queens.
The NYC suburbs are the same as, say, the Chicago suburbs. To call a place a "suburb," in the US, to me, usually carries a positive connotation--that of relative affluence. Dobbs Ferry is a suburb of NYC. Skokie is a suburb of Chicago. Yonkers is not usually thought of as a "suburb" of NYC, but as a separate "city." Its affluence varies. Daly City, is not, I believe, considered a "suburb" of San Francisco; it's not a poor place, but it's not an affluent place, either.
In places other than the US, however, a "suburb" carries a more neutral connotation. There are "good" suburbs and "bad" suburbs.
In the UK, if I'm not mistaken, a "suburb" is an area which is not in the Central Business District (CBD) of a city like Manchester, or London, no matter how "urban" it seems.
In South Africa, a "low-density" suburb is a good area, a "high-density suburb" is usually somewhat of a bad area.
I have no idea what you are talking about. I just call a inner city areas (like council flats and high populated areas) Urban. Places like small towns and privately owned housing in medium populated areas (Like Scarborough, where I used to live) Suburban and places like the country side (Similar to the outskirts of Scarborough where it is all farms and woods and hardly any housing) Rural.
_________________
Diagnosed with Autism, ADHD and OCD in 2008, aged 11.
Your neurodiverse (Autistic) score: 193 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-Autistic) score: 23 of 200
"Different but not less."