will@rd wrote:
Nobody has much empathy with autistics, including other autistics, because empathy means the ability to read and respond to nonverbal social cues, and we give virtually none. We have little facial expression, rarely gesticulate and do not maintain eye contact, therefore its almost impossible for others to even guess what we're thinking, much less know it intuitively.
This is not true. I have met a number of other autistics, all along the spectrum, and with the majority of them, I've noticed clear cues to how they're feeling in their body language. It's just that they use
different nonverbal cues, not that they don't use nonverbal cues at all. For example, one kid I knew I could tell exactly how he felt by the position of his shoulders. Also, a lot of autistics who avoid eye contact seem to use peripheral vision a lot, and once you know what to look for you can see that pretty clearly. (Ever watched a raven staring at something?)
I spot these things intuitively, because I do many of them myself, and those I don't do just seem to make intuitive sense to me anyway. A lot more sense than NT body language does. Maybe it's having a Dad on the spectrum that gave me this ability, I don't know. But I do know that for me, autistics are
way easier to read than NTs are. NTs I have to work at. Autistics, I just know.
Looking at the difference in how I relate to NTs versus autistics, I suspect if autistics were the majority, I'd have pretty much no ability to read NTs. I've spent most of my childhood training my relatively weak 'NT-reading', while knowing only one other autistic (my Dad) until the past 10 years, and yet I find autistics easier to read. I doubt I'd be doing so well at reading NTs if autistics were the majority, so I have sympathy for NTs not being able to read my cues as well as I can read theirs.