Edna3362 wrote:
Absurd.
From where I live, at least 95% of males are circumcised (usually by ages of 8-15) and IS a social plus for males as if it's a rite of passage.
Uncircumcised males are regarded to be impotent (not true), unmanly (lol what), or gay 'because he's much of a wuss to take any pain'.
And in several rural regions, instead of a surgical procedure, the circumcision method involves a thick chopping board, a chopping knife, a bunch of (guava?) leaves, and a river. I'm not kidding.
If that were true, every male I've met who's currently or past pubescent are all autistic.

Not good logical thinking. You said: "From where I live, at least 95% of males are circumcised (usually by ages of 8-15) and IS a social plus for males as if it's a rite of passage."
So in many cases the patient is aware of the impending procedure and because of it's social value
elects to have this done.
How different can you get, between that, and when you perform this excruciating act on an
unsuspecting newborn baby? Horrifying!! ! Terrible that people do this ignorant atrocity/mutilation to infants. It should be banned.