Tamaya wrote:
Yes, I can't relate to everything in that blog post I shared, but it still paints a good picture of why they shouldn't have taken Asperger's out of the autism spectrum.
Yeah I getcha. I find the part in the blog post about special interests snobby and ludicrously incorrect. But still I'm with you, having roughly distinct categories I think communicates far more information than 1 big mega label, if not always perfect.
Following on, I've always had a problem with the phrase "more rote than meaning" in regards to narrow interests in the autism and aspergers criterias. Because it's kind of unfair? To an observer, prattling on about a thing, collecting facts/objects about it, doing the same activity over and over looks meaningless. It look like pure "rote", only because it bores the observer. And yes while rote learning is something we're good that, the interest itself means the
world. Even the fixations non-verbal people have are meaningful to them, it's not mindless repetition. It's fun. It's the theme of someone's entire life.
_________________
MONKEY 2, 30s boogaloo