I first heard of it on a BBC Radio program, that found me sympathising with many of what were being presented as « defects » when they are really just differences. It wasn’t a perfect fit though, and the first clue as to why, had already come, in 1981, when I filled the full industrial version of the Chandler & Macleod Temperament and Aptitude psychometric test.
The output informed me that I was strongly normalising (the ability to adapt to whatever culture you find yourself in) but in the categories (once used in the 1935 Humm & Wadsworth Temperament Scale, from which the C & M was developed, and still to be found in aaron Rosanoff’s “A Theory of Personality…” of 1921) Hysteroid, Manic, Paranoid, Depressive and Epileptoid categories, I was Mr average, with all the subcategories neatly together (as is normally the case) other than for just one slightly higher than average blip, in the Depressive. In the Autistic category, though, it looked more like two shotgun blasts at both very strong and very weak! This is unusual, as is the fact that I had a significant strength in only one category (lost score strongly in two or three different categories. No, they don’t cancel out; the fact that I’m very weak in some subcategories is just as significant as being very strong in others. I am very much autistic, but quite atypical!
Interestingly, one of the experts comment that aspies were strongly overrepresented among history’s inventors and natural philosophers, at which the presenter very hastily shut down the show with a huffy “That would be very difficult to prove”, which is far from the case!