Page 3 of 3 [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Is the term ASD offensive?
Yes 4%  4%  [ 3 ]
No 61%  61%  [ 43 ]
Don't care either way 10%  10%  [ 7 ]
Llama 24%  24%  [ 17 ]
Total votes : 70

Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

21 Sep 2009, 9:03 pm

Disorder, maybe, but that doesn't mean it has to be fixed (unless for the purposes of functionality), nor that the person automatically has to choose a gender and identify with it. Some people simply don't fit into male/female categories all that easily. Autism's a disorder by the same reckoning, and we're fine with it, for the most part; so why should people born halfway between or completely outside gender boundaries be automatically considered to have something universally negative?


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


CTBill
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 514
Location: Connecticut, USA

21 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm

PhilipWHolland wrote:
Intersexuality is a disorder, no matter how you look at it.

Its occurrence is an anomaly, for sure.

But due to its rarity, its disorder component is indeterminate.



glider18
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,170
Location: USA

06 Sep 2010, 10:03 am

I think it should be Austism Spectrum Difference.

Now let's assume that 99 out of every 100 people were born autistic. Who would be the norm now? Socializing would become a disorder. "That sounds crazy," some of you might say. But seriously, if 99/100 of people were autistic, it would be considered normal, and being NT would be recognized in the books as a disorder. It is the majority that becomes the norm. Personally, being autistic myself, I don't find the ASD term with "disorder" too insulting to me. I voted that I didn't care either way.


_________________
"My journey has just begun."