Mdyar wrote:
b9 wrote:
i am severely unable to reciprocate with people, but my side of the conversation is always valid and interesting. other people can tolerate that for a limited amount of time, but soon they disengage when they realize that they are not able to reciprocate with me.
Quote:
i am like a talking machine and other peoples input is not effective much in moderating the course of my discussion,
but soon they disengage when they realize that they are not able to reciprocate with me.
I notice in some discussions on this board, you "reciprocate" and the equivalent poster board text conversation is two way. In other words there is a two way interest, and this bounces back and forth in a discussion.
You sometimes query first, and it develops.
what does "equivalent poster board text conversation" mean? does it mean similar to "textual dialogue" ?. i guess it does.
anyway, in the few examples of my posts where i respond to a reply to my earlier posts, the conversation usually goes for just one reply and evaporates rapidly (like this will do) because i can not think of anything else that further develops the line of discussion. once my single point is said, that is it for me. i am not dynamic with regard to exploring variants and side themes pertaining to what my original sentiment was.
most often, i do not bother to respond because i simply think "ok", and i do not think that is a postworthy thing to say.
Mdyar wrote:
Having said that b-9, are you saying that the quality of this two way stuff is unemotional and it is just a thing- in- and- of- itself ( like a scientific dissection), and is not connected to anything meaningful by others ( no drama), thus dies out IRL?
i have no emotional investment in my conversations. talking for me is just simply saying words that satisfy questions asked of me. if someone says something that should be flattering to me, i think "whatever", and likewise, if someone says something to me which should make me feel ashamed, i also think "whatever". everything in between those extremes are also of little interest to me.
i used the dismissive term "whatever" long before it became fashionable.
i think sometimes people mistake the fact that i provide detailed and arduously thought out replies to them as an indication that i am enthusiastic about continuing a conversation.
i think my propensity to provide detailed answers stems from when i was used as a test subject by a clinical trial team to evaluate the nature of "non mentally ret*d manifestations of autism" when i was a child. i was institutionalized in a psychiatric unit, and a chief psychiatrist and her team of student psychiatrists used to interview me almost 3 times per week to ask me many questions about the nature of my internal reality. they were formulating a presentation that would be used to contribute to the eventual addition of "asperger syndrome" to the diagnostic manual.
i very much liked that they listened carefully and took notes and queried me on aspects of what i had said, and i learned to describe things in fine detail (as far as i was concerned).
my psychiatrist told me that just as an intellectually handicapped person has a "poverty of ideas", i had a "poverty of emotions", and she said i was emotionally handicapped, and i know she was correct because i gave her all the information she needed to build her impression of me.
i do not have much investment in how people feel about what i say. i only care that they understand what i say, and i also care (these days) that i do not get into trouble because of what i say, so i will modulate my words to avoid punishment (like saying sorry on this site when i said something wrong).
having a very low reservoir of emotions does not mean i do not care about things. i sometimes feel sorry for people and i want to make them feel better, and i guess that is where i spend my few cents worth of emotional stock.
i do sense injustice, and i will remain in conversation if i see that someone is feeling bad, even though i may not be able to help, i will not turn away from them.
there is someone on this site who is feeling bad, and when i saw someone else's response to her i felt like joining the conversation, but it is in the haven, and i am not allowed to post there so i declined the urge to join in because i felt antagonistic toward a poster who was very unkind and glib, and i wanted to say something to make her feel better, but i really did not have anything constructive to add.
i am not entirely unable to reciprocate, but it is a rare occurrence.
also, there is no hyphen in my username.
that is all i have to say.