auntblabby wrote:
i'm more than willing to break bread with others that are not similar to me, and i know there must be a statistically signifigant number of others here who feel the same way.

Me too. Seems to work well most of the time for short periods, as long as the level of discourse doesn't get too deep. Quite another matter to get along well enough to agree on many of the deeper issues facing the Autism community.
I could see a "brotherhood" something along the lines of a Friar's Club, or Toastmasters. Something where the focus isn't much deeper than socializing.
I cannot envision an organization whose mission it is to "enlighten the world" about Autism. There are just too many deep rifts between certain philosophies about what Autism is, how we and society should deal with it, etc.
The only way I can envision something like this working is if the organization has a set of core values that are extremely "middle ground" in nature. I think in order to do that, certain "hot button" issues would by necessity have to be avoided altogether. In other words, the organization's official position would be no position.
I suppose with a lot of time, effort, and help from those few of us who actually have some level of organizational skills on a human level, that may be accomplished, but I can also see a set of values and non-positions on issues that would mean the group would end up as a fairly benign entity. Which I don't think is necessarily a bad thing. Groups like that have their uses too.
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...