Board index › General Discussion › General Autism Discussion

Have you found this circumcised penis for autistic

Page 3 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Previous topic | Next topic

mauloch_baal
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

Joined: 24 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 60

16 Jan 2017, 3:59 pm

Ban-Dodger wrote:
Circumcision is one of the absolute most absurd and faulty beliefs of human-society that is based on insane religious-rituals and is also based on erroneous beliefs about hygiene and disease. The madness needs to stop, for it is nothing more than genital-mutilation, and non-circumcised actually IS more «pleasure-able» for a lady, believe it or not, and I know that of one of my younger cousins (I think I am supposed to refer to him as cousin) is not circumcised, with a very pretty girlfriend, and she wants to stay with him (they have also already had a child together as I recall). Religions also teach the wrong things about sex, for sex is not a dirty act, but a beautiful act. Sex only becomes «dirty» if forced, coerced, freely given to the abusive, or denied to one's lover in order to manipulate/force the lover's behaviour to act a certain way towards the one who is withholding sex from their partner.


Completely agree, what right is it of someone else to cut off close to half the skin from someones penis. It is wrong it is our body what gives someone that right? It really seems to me circumcision is almost a punishment, an attempt to make sex less pleasant. How is it a human rights violation for it to be done to women but it is okay for it to be done to men?



rats_and_cats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 627
Location: USA

16 Jan 2017, 4:01 pm

Ban-Dodger wrote:
Circumcision is one of the absolute most absurd and faulty beliefs of human-society that is based on insane religious-rituals and is also based on erroneous beliefs about hygiene and disease. The madness needs to stop, for it is nothing more than genital-mutilation, and non-circumcised actually IS more «pleasure-able» for a lady, believe it or not, and I know that of one of my younger cousins (I think I am supposed to refer to him as cousin) is not circumcised, with a very pretty girlfriend, and she wants to stay with him (they have also already had a child together as I recall). Religions also teach the wrong things about sex, for sex is not a dirty act, but a beautiful act. Sex only becomes «dirty» if forced, coerced, freely given to the abusive, or denied to one's lover in order to manipulate/force the lover's behaviour to act a certain way towards the one who is withholding sex from their partner.


Religions aren't supposed to teach that sex is bad, but many INDIVIDUAL clergy members do. In Catholic school, I learned that sex is great when it's practiced safely and responsibly and without abuse. Of course, this included teaching that premarital sex is irresponsible, but that wasn't the focus.



Berabara
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 30 Mar 2016
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 333
Location: Warwick Queensland

16 Jan 2017, 4:55 pm

if they cut the foreskin they can cause health risk
i found this link
http://intactamerica.org/


in Australia we don't cut the foreskin anymore

if they cut it will be like this

Myth – The baby does not feel any pain during circumcision.
Fact – Circumcision is painful. Babies are sensitive to pain, just like older children and adults. The analgesics used for circumcision only decrease pain; they do not eliminate it. Further, the open wound left by the removal of the foreskin will continue to cause the baby pain and discomfort for the 7-10 days it takes to heal.


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 142 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 87 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)

Diagnosis Asperger's Syndrome back in 2005
also have Anxiety Disorder, OCD

Severe to Profound on my left ear and have cochlear implant on Right ear i'm Deaf


liveandrew
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2016
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 479
Location: Cornwall, UK

16 Jan 2017, 5:01 pm

rats_and_cats wrote:
In Catholic school, I learned that sex is great when it's practiced safely and responsibly and without abuse. Of course, this included teaching that premarital sex is irresponsible, but that wasn't the focus.


But the Catholic church still considers artificial birth control evil and a sin which surely precludes any form of safe and responsible sex? According to Catholic writ, the only forms of birth control that should be used is the wholly unsafe and irresponsible "rhythm method" or abstinence.

Admittedly, Pope Benedict XVI does seem to be in favour of changing the church's view of the use of condoms. Let's hope that it happens sooner rather than later or not at all.


_________________
Diagnosed: Asperger's Syndrome (ICD-10)
Self-Diagnosed: Aphantasia
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 46 of 200

Listener of all things noisy, viewer of all things bloody, writer of all things sh*t.


rats_and_cats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 627
Location: USA

16 Jan 2017, 11:41 pm

liveandrew wrote:
rats_and_cats wrote:
In Catholic school, I learned that sex is great when it's practiced safely and responsibly and without abuse. Of course, this included teaching that premarital sex is irresponsible, but that wasn't the focus.


But the Catholic church still considers artificial birth control evil and a sin which surely precludes any form of safe and responsible sex? According to Catholic writ, the only forms of birth control that should be used is the wholly unsafe and irresponsible "rhythm method" or abstinence.

Admittedly, Pope Benedict XVI does seem to be in favour of changing the church's view of the use of condoms. Let's hope that it happens sooner rather than later or not at all.


Aside from one teacher, every faculty member in the school (including nuns and youth pastors) was okay with the use of condoms. It seems like public opinion is changing faster than the Church.



liveandrew
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2016
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 479
Location: Cornwall, UK

17 Jan 2017, 2:07 am

rats_and_cats wrote:
liveandrew wrote:
rats_and_cats wrote:
In Catholic school, I learned that sex is great when it's practiced safely and responsibly and without abuse. Of course, this included teaching that premarital sex is irresponsible, but that wasn't the focus.


But the Catholic church still considers artificial birth control evil and a sin which surely precludes any form of safe and responsible sex? According to Catholic writ, the only forms of birth control that should be used is the wholly unsafe and irresponsible "rhythm method" or abstinence.

Admittedly, Pope Benedict XVI does seem to be in favour of changing the church's view of the use of condoms. Let's hope that it happens sooner rather than later or not at all.


Aside from one teacher, every faculty member in the school (including nuns and youth pastors) was okay with the use of condoms. It seems like public opinion is changing faster than the Church.


Hopefully, this groundswell of public opinion will change the church's mind even quicker.

As for circumcision, I think it's barbaric and serves no useful purpose. I would also say the same about another widespread form of child abuse, that of piercing ears. Why the hell do parents think it's ok to make holes in their child's body? I know I'm biased, having a hatred of jewellery and earrings in particular, but there's not even the fake excuse of hygiene to fall back on. It's done purely because the parent thinks their child looks better with semi-permanent hole in their ears.


_________________
Diagnosed: Asperger's Syndrome (ICD-10)
Self-Diagnosed: Aphantasia
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 46 of 200

Listener of all things noisy, viewer of all things bloody, writer of all things sh*t.


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,186
Location: Adelaide, Australia

18 Jan 2017, 6:11 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
Circumcision doesn't cause autism. If it did, most American men would have it.
What! I thought only Jews did that.
kraftiekortie wrote:
In 1961, the year of my birth, about 90% of American men were circumcised as neonates. It wasn't just Jews.
Oh. For what purpose did they did that to 90% of American males?
rats_and_cats wrote:
"The majority of kids get this done to them, and some kids are autistic, so therefore this causes autism!" The same argument anti-vaxxers use.
The voice of reason.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short


RetroGamer87
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,186
Location: Adelaide, Australia

18 Jan 2017, 6:13 am

liveandrew wrote:
rats_and_cats wrote:
liveandrew wrote:
rats_and_cats wrote:
In Catholic school, I learned that sex is great when it's practiced safely and responsibly and without abuse. Of course, this included teaching that premarital sex is irresponsible, but that wasn't the focus.
But the Catholic church still considers artificial birth control evil and a sin which surely precludes any form of safe and responsible sex? According to Catholic writ, the only forms of birth control that should be used is the wholly unsafe and irresponsible "rhythm method" or abstinence.

Admittedly, Pope Benedict XVI does seem to be in favour of changing the church's view of the use of condoms. Let's hope that it happens sooner rather than later or not at all.
Aside from one teacher, every faculty member in the school (including nuns and youth pastors) was okay with the use of condoms. It seems like public opinion is changing faster than the Church.
Hopefully, this groundswell of public opinion will change the church's mind even quicker.

As for circumcision, I think it's barbaric and serves no useful purpose. I would also say the same about another widespread form of child abuse, that of piercing ears. Why the hell do parents think it's ok to make holes in their child's body? I know I'm biased, having a hatred of jewellery and earrings in particular, but there's not even the fake excuse of hygiene to fall back on. It's done purely because the parent thinks their child looks better with semi-permanent hole in their ears.
Nowadays the protestants are even more conservative than the Catholics. It used to be the other way around.


_________________
The days are long, but the years are short