why aspergers is not autism please read
It's complicated... it really is.
I wasn't aware of that. I thought it was a tick connected to the lower functioning autistics, and I always thought that to be higher functioning meant people would be unable to tell something was 'off' at first glance, leading to problems in communication later on.
I don't think people can tell at first glance what, but I suspect they sense a difference. This is something I try not to think about, as I've no control over subtle first impressions. I doubt ASD is the first thing that comes to their minds, though. And I don't really, inside, want to see myself as different. I see myself as me. A person. With thoughts and feelings and wishes no different than what I imagine anyone else may think and feel and dream. Just expressing it is maybe harder and some things get me confused. And I think I'm overwhelmed more than average. But that doesn't change who or what I am to me. Even if I know others may not see me the same way I do.
sonofghandi
Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse.
Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor.
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
Now as far as classic autism is concerned, I do not wish to be lumped together with those who are significantly lower functioning then myself. I may not be your average typical guy but when people hear the word "autism" oftentimes negative images come to mind of people who cannot communicate at all, who flap their hands around, who are robotic or lacking empathy... stuff they've seen in movies and TV documentaries, basically. I would like to differentiate the two, at least to some degree, because I do belong to the group that is somewhat more functional.
Eh? The group 'which is somewhat more functional'?? Why can't we accept that this is more complex than a simple one dimensional spectrum? To me there is no hard and fast rule which says "AS is on this end of the spectrum and classic autism is on the other end". I don't think you can differentiate the two in this way - to do so is hugely oversimplistic and, I suspect, a little insulting. I have a classic autism diagnosis; I had delayed speech in my early years. I have good university degrees and have been in full time employment for the last 25 years. It does annoy me slightly when people wish to make a distinction based on 'function' - whaever that means...
OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse.
Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor.
Nice!
(For the confused- it's a Monty Python sketch)
http://www.mindspring.com/~mfpatton/sketch.htm
People with Aspergers tend to have poor communication skills
People with Autism tend to have poor eye contact
People with Aspergers tend to have poor eye contact
People with Autism tend to have trouble making friends and forming relationships
People with Aspergers tend to have trouble making friends and forming relationships
People with Autism tend to have an obsession or special interest
People with Aspergers tend to have an obsession or special interest
People with Autism are prone to having sensitivity issues
People with Aspergers are prone to having sensitivity issues
People with Autism are likely to engage in self stimulating behaviour
People with Aspergers are likely to engage in self stimulating behaviour
It is quite obvious from my post above that Aspergers Syndrome and Autism are totally separate conditions how anybody could think they are linked is a mystery to me.
wow i see nothing to be different. if they are different, where is the difference? but i get your sarcasm.
_________________
In order to be free, you must take your chances of letting your tortured self to be forgiven.
mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 32
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,028
Location: Alberta, Canada
It's ironic, because people on the autism spectrum often have a hard time interpreting sarcasm. I have trouble with it sometimes, but I can definitely give it out. I guess I'm not the only sarcastic aspie out there.
The OP could have tacked this on to the end of the original post:
"Autistics have trouble understanding sarcasm"
"Aspies have trouble understanding sarcasm".
Its one more similarity between the two groups, and it would have been a humorous way to clue the largely autistic readership that what was written above was itsself an example of sarcasm.
I agree, that would have been great for those of us on here that have trouble interpreting it.
I remember when I read the original post, I got that there was a message about how autism and Aspergers are really the same thing, and how dumb it is that people keep insisting that the two are different disorders.
OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is abuse.
Ah yes, you want room 12A, Just along the corridor.
_________________
"I'm bad and that's good. I'll never be good and that's not bad. There's no one I'd rather be than me."
Wreck It Ralph
It's complicated... it really is.
I wasn't aware of that. I thought it was a tick connected to the lower functioning autistics, and I always thought that to be higher functioning meant people would be unable to tell something was 'off' at first glance, leading to problems in communication later on.
_________________
"I'm bad and that's good. I'll never be good and that's not bad. There's no one I'd rather be than me."
Wreck It Ralph
i just got the sarcasm! i completely agree, during my assessments the line was very blurred and my results were very close to that of someone on a lower end of the spectrum, but because i can adjust my behaviours i was diagnosed as a very very Mild ASD, (( if aspergers was still on the DSM it would be AS but now its changed,))
_________________
Obsessing over Sonic the Hedgehog since 2009
Diagnosed with Aspergers' syndrome in 2012.
Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 severity without intellectual disability and without language impairment in 2015.
DA: http://mephilesdark123.deviantart.com
Eh? The group 'which is somewhat more functional'?? Why can't we accept that this is more complex than a simple one dimensional spectrum? To me there is no hard and fast rule which says "AS is on this end of the spectrum and classic autism is on the other end". I don't think you can differentiate the two in this way - to do so is hugely oversimplistic and, I suspect, a little insulting. I have a classic autism diagnosis; I had delayed speech in my early years. I have good university degrees and have been in full time employment for the last 25 years. It does annoy me slightly when people wish to make a distinction based on 'function' - whaever that means...
_________________
"I'm bad and that's good. I'll never be good and that's not bad. There's no one I'd rather be than me."
Wreck It Ralph
sonofghandi
Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
Should it spoken with the accent of a Spaniard while speaking to a Cicilian?
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
Should it spoken with the accent of a Spaniard while speaking to a Cicilian?
_________________
"I'm bad and that's good. I'll never be good and that's not bad. There's no one I'd rather be than me."
Wreck It Ralph
So there you go. All this LFA/HFA stuff, really, " I don't think it means what you think it means!"
Well said, skibum - I completely agree! Let's just try and enjoy the diversity of everyone "on the spectrum" and recognise that it will always be far too complicated to categorise in any remotely satisfactory way!
What I wonder for a while is:
LFA means low functioning autism which is defined by being autistic plus an intellectual disability, HFA means high functioning autism which is defined by being autistic plus no intellectual disability or absence of intellectual disability.
Are non autistic people who have an intellectual disability defined as low functioning neurotypical?
Or non autistic people without an intellectual disability defined as high functioning neurotypical?
I never heard of this, but neurotypicals do not refer to them as neurotypicals as well, as far as I know the term is coined in the autistic community,
as autistic was coined in the non autistic world.
The term low functioning is a protection as it defines that low functioning autistics have special needs to be met,
but sometimes it sounds a kind of dehumanizing,
where it is forgotten that the low functioning autistic person in the first place is a person.
Sometimes I really hate labels.
Though my own lables give me pronounced support.
_________________
English is not my native language, so I will very likely do mistakes in writing or understanding. My edits are due to corrections of mistakes, which I sometimes recognize just after submitting a text.
but sometimes it sounds a kind of dehumanizing,
where it is forgotten that the low functioning autistic person in the first place is a person.
Sometimes I really hate labels.
Though my own lables give me pronounced support.
Eloa. I think you are right. When people say someone is 'low functioning' it might mean there is something which that person needs support with. But what many people who read the label LFA (or in my view also anyone who is autistic but "non Aspergers") miss is all the other things, abilities and qualities that the person has. People are too quick to try and put an easy "black and white" interpretation on things and it annoys me too.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Having Autism |
27 Jul 2026, 3:08 pm |
| Autism/Agoraphobia |
30 Jul 2026, 9:57 pm |
| New here - Sobriety & autism, etc |
27 Jul 2026, 10:40 am |
| Autism influencers on IG, X, TikTok, etc. |
15 Jul 2026, 3:36 am |

