Board index › General Discussion › General Autism Discussion

Would mating with sentient species constitute beastiality?

Page 4 of 7 [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Previous topic | Next topic

ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

17 Jun 2005, 1:16 pm

wow. I never thought about it like that before. I guess your right. that would be sick and wrong. and not much better then the zoo...



Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

17 Jun 2005, 1:29 pm

Of course.


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

17 Jun 2005, 1:31 pm

well. if we can mate with them, then we should give them higher paying jobs! I mean they are fathering our children!

ok. I got off topic. the thing is if we can actually produce offspring, then it isn't beastiality.



Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

17 Jun 2005, 1:38 pm

But what if they are obese and ugly? Then it is!


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.


ShadesOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,983
Location: California

17 Jun 2005, 1:48 pm

No. it isn't considered Beastiality if we mate with a human who is obese and ugly is it? love has no rhyme or reason...



Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

17 Jun 2005, 3:29 pm

Oh well. I was only joking.


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.


Sarcastic_Name
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,593

18 Jun 2005, 12:22 am

I seriously doubt mating would produce ANY offspring. The thought makes me shudder. :?


_________________
Hello.


Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

18 Jun 2005, 1:53 am

Sarcastic_Name wrote:
I seriously doubt mating would produce ANY offspring. The thought makes me shudder. :?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.


Sophist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,332
Location: Louisville, KY

18 Jun 2005, 1:50 pm

Well, there's enough hypothesizing that we may have mated with the Neanderthals in the past. If that's true, why break a tradition???

Image


_________________
My Science blog, Science Over a Cuppa - http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/

My partner's autism science blog, Cortical Chauvinism - http://corticalchauvinism.wordpress.com/


Malcolm_Scipo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,007

18 Jun 2005, 2:08 pm

How about no?


_________________
THOUGHT IT WAS THE END.
THOUGHT IT WAS THE 4TH OF JULY.
I WOKE UP AND THEN I REALISED,
I WAS NOT WHAT I HAD ALWAYS TRIED TO EMULATE.
INSTEAD A SHADOW OF FORMER GLORY.
AND THEN I CRIED.


Sanityisoverrated
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,382

18 Jun 2005, 2:41 pm

I thought this topic was referring to mating with a LIVING neanderthal, not a skeletal one...


... cause I mean if its a skeletal one we're talking about, you can count me in! MMmmm! Bone the Bones! :twisted:

>_>

<_<

..ahem.



PeterMacKenzie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 626
Location: BANNED FOR DISCUSSING RECENT BANNINGS!

18 Jun 2005, 2:48 pm

I like females with strong bone structures. I generally like them to have flesh too, though, and a fair bit of muscle is nice.


_________________
Banned for discussing the recent spate of bannings.


Psychlone
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 713
Location: Michigan

18 Jun 2005, 3:27 pm

PeterMacKenzie wrote:
I like females with strong bone structures. I generally like them to have flesh too, though, and a fair bit of muscle is nice.


Oh, and don't forget skin to cover it all up with. :wink:



Psychlone
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 713
Location: Michigan

18 Jun 2005, 3:29 pm

Malcolm_Scipo wrote:
ShadesOfMe wrote:
No. Because we derived from that species. technically they are our ancestors, and very closely the same. we are very similar, even more so then apes. we wouldn't keep them in a cage at the zoo, so therefore it isn't wrong.

Instead, we would give them low paying jobs at McDonalds.... wait a minute. Is that not like putting them in a zoo?


I think Neanderthals would make excellent Athletes. They have such powerful builds that modern humans would be no match for them in feats of strength. :)



Prometheus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,506
Location: Through the plexiglass

18 Jun 2005, 3:30 pm

I would love to wrestle one.


_________________
All your bass are belong to us.


PeterMacKenzie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 626
Location: BANNED FOR DISCUSSING RECENT BANNINGS!

18 Jun 2005, 3:38 pm

<Imagines one holding you up by the ankles and bouncing your head on the ground.>

Maybe that only applies to fictional orangutans...


_________________
Banned for discussing the recent spate of bannings.