Page 4 of 4 [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,277

04 Jan 2008, 7:42 am

logitechdog wrote:
Here's something, do you think you do the same thing to all people that is out there, that they is a approach that works the same way as it would for another. How about treating that person as an individual, not all As people are the same, the answer is just as wide as any other thing...

Take that person as an individual because not all As people are the same... They is no easy answer because what work's for one doesn't work for another, what one find's hard another does not, the fact is treating it that way mean's the person has to defend itself, rather than having a none conflicting conversation, where it starts off with defending what a person can & can't do...

Start's to make you wonder if this is a reason behind As people not getting Nt's, if Nts can't get As people then how come we are the only one's said that we cannot understand other minds, I can understand just the fact I am not like that, like the saying goes it takes 2 to negotiate & it is pointless if only 1 is negotiating...

So asking advice from how to talk to an As person would be the same as most males asking 1 female how to talk to a female... What work's for one does not work for another...


You ARE right, of course, but I tried to cover a LOT in my preceeding post. Perhaps THAT is why almost all of them are things to AVOID! BTW most females probably have the same BASIC mindset, and know parts of other mindsets to avoid. One might LOVE pornos, for example, but know others don't. You can also add your own dislikes, especially since, ideally, you want to avoid them anyway.



violet_yoshi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,297

04 Jan 2008, 8:14 am

Aspie1 wrote:
Talk to them like you would with anybody, engaging them in a normal conversation. However, you'll need to verbalize a lot of emotions, and explain a lot of jokes. Also, some aspies don't like it when people who don't have AS use the word "aspie" to refer to them (think of the N-word analogy). Medical-sounding terms such as "has Asperger's" (the word syndrome is dropped, due to its negative connotation), are generally acceptable. Don't worry about making the conversation too intelligent, since most aspies actually prefer it that way.


I don't see the term Aspie as similar to the N-Word. The N-Word is without a doubt offensive, despite who says it. Aspie is a cute term for Asperger's Syndrome, and I really like cute. I see no problem with someone calling me Aspie. It's better than "freak" or "ret*d".


_________________
"Sprinkle, sprinkle, little bar, what I wonder is a cat" - Cheese from Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends


The_Q
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 193
Location: The Continuum

04 Jan 2008, 9:38 am

violet_yoshi wrote:
Aspie1 wrote:
Talk to them like you would with anybody, engaging them in a normal conversation. However, you'll need to verbalize a lot of emotions, and explain a lot of jokes. Also, some aspies don't like it when people who don't have AS use the word "aspie" to refer to them (think of the N-word analogy). Medical-sounding terms such as "has Asperger's" (the word syndrome is dropped, due to its negative connotation), are generally acceptable. Don't worry about making the conversation too intelligent, since most aspies actually prefer it that way.


I don't see the term Aspie as similar to the N-Word. The N-Word is without a doubt offensive, despite who says it. Aspie is a cute term for Asperger's Syndrome, and I really like cute. I see no problem with someone calling me Aspie. It's better than "freak" or "ret*d".


I agree. Personally, I need a term to identify myself with. Aspie seems quite good enough. I can't think of anything better presently.

A few people have mentioned NT's talking down to Aspie's as if they are not quite good enough or to an extreme, mentally ret*d. I went to a lecture given by Harold Stone. I'm not sure if anybody on this forum is aware of him. He's an Aspie over here in Australia who's very well versed in the needs of people with Asperger's Syndrome and knows his stuff about Asperger's in general. At times (especially when he was talking about the achievements of people who are or are suspected to be Aspie's) he was the one talking down to NT's as if they were the one's who are behind to Eight ball. Aspie's on the whole are far from stupid - just different was his main point. I've come to the conclusion that in at least some ways, Aspie thinking is actually quite ahead of our NT brethren. We often take longer to do things and make certain achievements in life, but that need not be classed as a disability in my book.


_________________
Q: "Humans are such commonplace little creatures."
--"Deja Q"