NocturnalQuilter wrote:
I'm a bit confused by something:
I've been reading a lot of posts from people who say they have a hard time "understanding" or perceiving context, subtext, inflection, innuendo. Yet in other posts they claim to know when something is false or fake- either in someone else or in themselves.
As it applies to this particular thread I'm intetrested in knowing from those who believe they appear fake, demented or worse when they fake a smile; quite frankly, how would you know?
I always kinda assumed that most people with Asperger's are pretty literal- so I get the idea of not smiling because you don't feel happy. But what I don't get is how you would know that anyone else would know you're faking it?
Am I making sense?
That's not true in general. Also, there's a big difference between reading natural emotion and reading culturally relative subtexts. I don't have any problem with the former.
I think I've read that there was a study somewhere that showed that it was nearly impossible for someone to have a genuine smile without any accompanying positive emotion. There are always subtle differences, especially around the eyes, between the smiles of people experiencing positive emotion and people who aren't. They literally attached sensors to peoples faces to map the facial expressions with simultaneous brain scans. It's certainly detectable to many people including myself.