grayson wrote:
I want to thank SB2 and ascan and all others involved for conducting a "flame test" to test the validity of the thread topic

.
But seriously, I think the last couple of posts SB2 and ascan wrote to each other demonstrate my point really well: they got kind of heated and irritated with each other before that, but then they actually answered the questions the other put to them ( "what do you mean, grovelling in self-pity?") seriously and thoughtfully, and in the end, they got back to being civil with one another, with an apology or two thrown in for good measure.
I think that's a pretty Aspie-specific trait, at least in great numbers, because posters on most boards I've been on never get back to the "answer the questions thoughtfully and seriously" part -- they just continue to be offended by the original thing that ticked them off in the first place.
I just thought this was a good thread topic and this deserved to be a 100 post reply thread.
just trying to help.
The thing is, i have had an opportunity to have a few discussions with ascan in the past and i respect many of his views. i didn't wan't to be ill will between us.
and i also thought that there was a decent chance he was 'tongue in cheek' (ing) me. So i felt the need to protect my reputation, and a friendship.
I have no problem going overboard if i feel that the group is being attacked or myself.
It isn't about winning a debate (i can be wrong) so it isn't about ego with me, moreso it is about what i perceive as the greater good. And sometimes drastic measures are called for. Not each time.
Thank you Grayson, i have come to respect you deeply.