Page 6 of 6 [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

kamiyu910
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,036
Location: California

17 May 2015, 12:15 am

I'm too tired to get into philosophy on the subject, but I suppose I do want, to an extent, to be respected at least. I don't require people to admire me, I just want to be treated like a human, not like some weird freak. Since society doesn't seem interested in that, I don't try to interact with society and do my own thing. I've given up caring (for the most part) what other people think of me. If I want to wear armor to the store, then I shall do so.
I just don't like being talked down to, or talked over.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 171 of 200
Your Neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 40 of 200


olympiadis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,849
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois

17 May 2015, 12:22 am

kamiyu910 wrote:
I'm too tired to get into philosophy on the subject, but I suppose I do want, to an extent, to be respected at least. I don't require people to admire me, I just want to be treated like a human, not like some weird freak. Since society doesn't seem interested in that, I don't try to interact with society and do my own thing. I've given up caring (for the most part) what other people think of me. If I want to wear armor to the store, then I shall do so.
I just don't like being talked down to, or talked over.



I understand. It seems to us that respect as in being treated as a human does NOT imply any type of hierarchy at all, which is what I think some people are assuming when they use the word "respect".
Perhaps there's another word that better fits what we are talking about, but vocabulary isn't my specialty.
I understand what you are saying though.



cavernio
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,462

17 May 2015, 10:48 am

olympiadis wrote:
Are you saying they have created their own definition of "social status" and limited it to their terms?

yes. I've quoted the terms in this thread, you quoted their terms in the OP.
Quote:
And you're saying that it's then assumed that any other interpretation of "social status" as it is commonly known to the public is exempt ?

Exempt from their findings? Absolutely.
Psychological experiments work by taking a concept, then explicitly define what that concept means, then find tests that measure that explicit concept. There is no other way to even come close to remotely measure anything psychology scientifically. This is called making an 'operational definition'.

Oftentimes there will be extrapolations that it can imply something else, or that the operational definition of the term they used then leads to more things, but any researcher worth anything will only very hesitatingly say so with lots of 'maybe' 'could mean that' and other things. In a paper there is -not- going to be any 'oh but you know they implied this' things that are going to be valid, papers do not imply unless they say 'this implies'.
Granted, we didn't actually read the paper only the news article about the paper which is kind of like: http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=1623

Lastly, if this were anything but WP I would think you were trolling me and having a laugh at getting me to repeat myself like 5 times.


_________________
Not autistic, I think
Prone to depression
Have celiac disease
Poor motivation


olympiadis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,849
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois

17 May 2015, 11:23 am

cavernio wrote:
olympiadis wrote:
Are you saying they have created their own definition of "social status" and limited it to their terms?

yes. I've quoted the terms in this thread, you quoted their terms in the OP.
Quote:
And you're saying that it's then assumed that any other interpretation of "social status" as it is commonly known to the public is exempt ?

Exempt from their findings? Absolutely.
Psychological experiments work by taking a concept, then explicitly define what that concept means, then find tests that measure that explicit concept. There is no other way to even come close to remotely measure anything psychology scientifically. This is called making an 'operational definition'.

Oftentimes there will be extrapolations that it can imply something else, or that the operational definition of the term they used then leads to more things, but any researcher worth anything will only very hesitatingly say so with lots of 'maybe' 'could mean that' and other things. In a paper there is -not- going to be any 'oh but you know they implied this' things that are going to be valid, papers do not imply unless they say 'this implies'.
Granted, we didn't actually read the paper only the news article about the paper which is kind of like: http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=1623

Lastly, if this were anything but WP I would think you were trolling me and having a laugh at getting me to repeat myself like 5 times.


Well then, their news article is clearly rubbish.
Since this is my thread, then it appears you are trolling me.
I have no further questions.



IntellectualCat
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 175

17 May 2015, 3:59 pm

olympiadis wrote:
:lol: ...not everyone.

Article:
https://www.yahoo.com/health/the-one-th ... 62677.html


Quote:
People may be very different, but there’s one thing everyone wants from friends and peers, research shows.

You may not have a deep desire for a cushy job, designer duds, or a luxury car. But according to a new research review, everyone — yes, everyone — has the need for a high level of social status.

Theorists have debated this question for decades: Is it human nature to want high standing in one’s social circle, profession, or society in general?


Quote:
The One Thing Everyone — Yes Everyone! — Really Wants
People may be very different, but there’s one thing everyone wants from friends and peers, research shows.

So researchers from University of California, Berkeley’s Haas School of Business reviewed hundreds of studies to find out. Their conclusion: Each person, whether they realize it or not, cares about their status. The findings were published in the journal Psychological Bulletin.

Status is defined as respect or admiration, voluntary deference (people willingly listening to you), and social value (possessing characteristics that others want to emulate), according to lead study author Cameron Anderson, PhD.

“If you are seen as important and as someone who possesses socially valued characteristics, you have high status,” Anderson tells Yahoo Health. And since status influences the way others think and behave, it makes status a universally important issue. “Whenever you don’t feel valued by others it hurts, and the lack of status hurts more people than we think.”



...interesting.


I hate it when people say that everyone is a certain way even if they don't realize it. It leads to people who are different being told that they are in denial. That can lead to those people having low self-esteem. I have experienced that when I was told that all humans are social creatures, therefore everyone would be miserable or go insane if they are alone (to make matters worse, I confused shame with loneliness). All we can really say is "humans tend to have characteristic X".

I don't desire status. While I do care about being listened to, I am okay with people disagreeing with me unless they are saying I am not experiencing the things I say I am experiencing. While I do care about having value in society, I am more concerned with it being possible for me to contribute to people's knowledge, and I couldn't care less if people recognize me for the contribution.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

17 May 2015, 4:10 pm

I have a Bachelor






of SCIENCE





IN MATHEMATICS



So, I now outrank many of you in social status, including those of you with lesser degrees.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

17 May 2015, 5:19 pm

IntellectualCat wrote:

I hate it when people say that everyone is a certain way even if they don't realize it. It leads to people who are different being told that they are in denial. That can lead to those people having low self-esteem. I have experienced that when I was told that all humans are social creatures, therefore everyone would be miserable or go insane if they are alone (to make matters worse, I confused shame with loneliness). All we can really say is "humans tend to have characteristic X".

I don't desire status. While I do care about being listened to, I am okay with people disagreeing with me unless they are saying I am not experiencing the things I say I am experiencing. While I do care about having value in society, I am more concerned with it being possible for me to contribute to people's knowledge, and I couldn't care less if people recognize me for the contribution.


Well I hate to devolve back into the hierarchy but the intention is to give you low self esteem. If you are not part of the hierarchy you are "other". "Other" is subversive and a threat to a hierarchy so you must either behave the way you are told or be outcast. Whether you see said thing or not is irrelevant, that you comply is all that matters. Hierarchies don't care about right or wrong, true or false, they care only about power: how to increase it and how to use it.

Now that's some pretty vague and conceptual s**t no doubt. But we can apply that philosophy to your situation. Your friends and loved ones share a hive-mind-- this is what we would call culture, or a way of doing things that's been taught since birth and lasts lifelong. If you don't respond to the cues in their culture they don't know how to respond to you, they've only been taught a limited amount of "acceptable" responses and those that don't fit must be disregarded or it could affect their own social status. You are supposed to feel ashamed and have low self-esteem because you don't conform to their culture. If you don't fit to their idea of culture you can't contribute to it and therefore have no value to it. The low self esteem you feel is supposed to force your conformity-- they have numbers and thus power, you being solitary in your opinion do not.

Ever seen the kid on the playground get harassed and the teacher do nothing? That's because the kid getting harassed by his peers doesn't fit in socially and that's unacceptable to all members of the collective, including the teacher. The kid getting harassed may tell the teacher and get in trouble this is because the harassed kid has caused the teacher a problem and thus extra work by "not fitting in" with their peers. The teacher has every incentive to approach the situation like this: it's less work to discipline one child than an entire classroom.



Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

17 May 2015, 5:25 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
I have a Bachelor
of SCIENCE
IN MATHEMATICS
So, I now outrank many of you in social status, including those of you with lesser degrees.


[joking]
I have a Bachelor of I Don't Give a Flying f**k in the discipline of Your Paper Is Merely A Paper Like Mine Is Merely A Paper from the University Of The Reality Of Physics.
[/joking]



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

17 May 2015, 5:52 pm

Math is the most abstract science, and teaches people to discern the truth.


Edited to add: Take that!


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

17 May 2015, 6:01 pm

Should we ask to have this thread renamed High School Status, or should we just move on.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


olympiadis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,849
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois

17 May 2015, 7:17 pm

Aristophanes wrote:
IntellectualCat wrote:

I hate it when people say that everyone is a certain way even if they don't realize it. It leads to people who are different being told that they are in denial. That can lead to those people having low self-esteem. I have experienced that when I was told that all humans are social creatures, therefore everyone would be miserable or go insane if they are alone (to make matters worse, I confused shame with loneliness). All we can really say is "humans tend to have characteristic X".

I don't desire status. While I do care about being listened to, I am okay with people disagreeing with me unless they are saying I am not experiencing the things I say I am experiencing. While I do care about having value in society, I am more concerned with it being possible for me to contribute to people's knowledge, and I couldn't care less if people recognize me for the contribution.


Well I hate to devolve back into the hierarchy but the intention is to give you low self esteem. If you are not part of the hierarchy you are "other". "Other" is subversive and a threat to a hierarchy so you must either behave the way you are told or be outcast. Whether you see said thing or not is irrelevant, that you comply is all that matters. Hierarchies don't care about right or wrong, true or false, they care only about power: how to increase it and how to use it.

Now that's some pretty vague and conceptual s**t no doubt. But we can apply that philosophy to your situation. Your friends and loved ones share a hive-mind-- this is what we would call culture, or a way of doing things that's been taught since birth and lasts lifelong. If you don't respond to the cues in their culture they don't know how to respond to you, they've only been taught a limited amount of "acceptable" responses and those that don't fit must be disregarded or it could affect their own social status. You are supposed to feel ashamed and have low self-esteem because you don't conform to their culture. If you don't fit to their idea of culture you can't contribute to it and therefore have no value to it. The low self esteem you feel is supposed to force your conformity-- they have numbers and thus power, you being solitary in your opinion do not.

Ever seen the kid on the playground get harassed and the teacher do nothing? That's because the kid getting harassed by his peers doesn't fit in socially and that's unacceptable to all members of the collective, including the teacher. The kid getting harassed may tell the teacher and get in trouble this is because the harassed kid has caused the teacher a problem and thus extra work by "not fitting in" with their peers. The teacher has every incentive to approach the situation like this: it's less work to discipline one child than an entire classroom.


That's a really great explanation. Thank you.
But, which one are you?
Do you agree with the logic of the hierarchy? ( as in you don't mind being a player in the game ),
or would you rather be allowed to exist outside of that context?

If you see the current logical structures in action in as much detail as I'm thinking you do, then it's hard for me to think you can't help but vomit, just a little at least.



Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

17 May 2015, 8:41 pm

olympiadis wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
IntellectualCat wrote:

I hate it when people say that everyone is a certain way even if they don't realize it. It leads to people who are different being told that they are in denial. That can lead to those people having low self-esteem. I have experienced that when I was told that all humans are social creatures, therefore everyone would be miserable or go insane if they are alone (to make matters worse, I confused shame with loneliness). All we can really say is "humans tend to have characteristic X".

I don't desire status. While I do care about being listened to, I am okay with people disagreeing with me unless they are saying I am not experiencing the things I say I am experiencing. While I do care about having value in society, I am more concerned with it being possible for me to contribute to people's knowledge, and I couldn't care less if people recognize me for the contribution.


Well I hate to devolve back into the hierarchy but the intention is to give you low self esteem. If you are not part of the hierarchy you are "other". "Other" is subversive and a threat to a hierarchy so you must either behave the way you are told or be outcast. Whether you see said thing or not is irrelevant, that you comply is all that matters. Hierarchies don't care about right or wrong, true or false, they care only about power: how to increase it and how to use it.

Now that's some pretty vague and conceptual s**t no doubt. But we can apply that philosophy to your situation. Your friends and loved ones share a hive-mind-- this is what we would call culture, or a way of doing things that's been taught since birth and lasts lifelong. If you don't respond to the cues in their culture they don't know how to respond to you, they've only been taught a limited amount of "acceptable" responses and those that don't fit must be disregarded or it could affect their own social status. You are supposed to feel ashamed and have low self-esteem because you don't conform to their culture. If you don't fit to their idea of culture you can't contribute to it and therefore have no value to it. The low self esteem you feel is supposed to force your conformity-- they have numbers and thus power, you being solitary in your opinion do not.

Ever seen the kid on the playground get harassed and the teacher do nothing? That's because the kid getting harassed by his peers doesn't fit in socially and that's unacceptable to all members of the collective, including the teacher. The kid getting harassed may tell the teacher and get in trouble this is because the harassed kid has caused the teacher a problem and thus extra work by "not fitting in" with their peers. The teacher has every incentive to approach the situation like this: it's less work to discipline one child than an entire classroom.


That's a really great explanation. Thank you.
But, which one are you?
Do you agree with the logic of the hierarchy? ( as in you don't mind being a player in the game ),
or would you rather be allowed to exist outside of that context?

If you see the current logical structures in action in as much detail as I'm thinking you do, then it's hard for me to think you can't help but vomit, just a little at least.


My views are ever changing based on the evidence I learn, I am a creature of logic and reasoning. I'm one who can't be taught but is great at learning therefore I can't fit the hive mold and am other. Since I was a child I've always felt a strong sense of accepting others as human beings first and foremost regardless of race/religion/sexuality/etc. and couldn't understand why my peers couldn't accept difference. So yeah, it makes me vomit, a lot actually. Your avatar says everything you need to know about me. :wink:



olympiadis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,849
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois

17 May 2015, 9:29 pm

^ Well, this is Wrong Planet, so I'm sure there are a lot of "others" here.
That's the primary reason for posting this news article here. They clearly left us out of their survey.
However, that's just part of the deal of being an other. We don't count because we're not in the game.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

21 May 2015, 3:14 pm

Nonsense. We just don't realize how much of a positive impact we have on other people because we are bad at picking up on that stuff.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

21 May 2015, 6:46 pm

If only we were still a feudal society, and some of us could have high social status simply because of our names or what we own!


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


VisInsita
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 375
Location: Finland

22 May 2015, 10:54 am

jrjones9933 wrote:
If only we were still a feudal society, and some of us could have high social status simply because of our names or what we own!

:lol: