Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 


Does "neurodiversity" embrace more than just the autism spectrum?
Yes, it is an open tent 85%  85%  [ 17 ]
No, we need our own space 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
Don't know / not sure 10%  10%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 20

visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

21 Dec 2009, 12:11 pm

I am a member of the diversity committee at my workplace. At one of our early meetings I pointed out that our definition of "diversity," does not include neurodiversity. That means, of course, that it is my responsibility to come up with language to expand the definition.

I want a definition that includes not only people in our workplace that are on the autism spectrum, but also those who bring other differences to their work. There are people here with social anxiety, attention deficits, obsessive/compulsive behaviours, learning disabilities. I want to ensure that all of them see themselves as included within our diversity policy.

So my question becomes, "Does neurodiversity refer exclusively to the autism spectrum, or is it a broad enough term to include other differences?"


_________________
--James


PlatedDrake
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,365
Location: Piedmont Region, NC, USA

21 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm

Well, in a way it does, but on the other hand, that word could apply to any "mindset." Taken literally, this would cover anyone with a different opinion to everyone else rather than an actual psychological Dx. If you think about it, human habitation on the planet is very neurodiverse. Thats why different cultures, philosophies, religions, etc exist. So on one hand, yes, on another, no. Psychodiversity might be a better word, but that could be easily put into the same wording as neurodiversity (as both words mean about the same thing). I think it would be considered psychosocial diversity as, if im interpreting correctly, that those with different brain wiring are psychologically and socially different from the "norm." Might want to hit the thesaurus for a bit and see what other prefixes might be better suited.



Willard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,647

21 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm

PlatedDrake wrote:
Well, in a way it does, but on the other hand, that word could apply to any "mindset." Taken literally, this would cover anyone with a different opinion to everyone else rather than an actual psychological Dx.



Neuro doesn't mean 'mind' in the broad sense of 'thought' - it means 'of the brain' (literally 'of the nervous system') as an organ, so merely having differing opinions wouldn't qualify. It would have to be taken to mean 'differences in brain functionality', which would include ADD, ADHD, OCD, Schizophrenia, Bipolar and any other disorder that causes the brain to function outside the range of the (organically) typical.



Mysty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,762

21 Dec 2009, 1:18 pm

I don't see it the same way as PlateDrake. People on the autistic spectrum are not the only ones with true neurological differences. Bipolar. Down's syndrome. (The latter has other differences as well, but, still, neurological difference too.) Homosexuals. Some nuerological differences can fairly be called disorders, some shouldn't be. I certainly think homosexuality falls under neurodiversity, and isn't a disorder.


_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

21 Dec 2009, 1:57 pm

visagrunt wrote:
I am a member of the diversity committee at my workplace. At one of our early meetings I pointed out that our definition of "diversity," does not include neurodiversity. That means, of course, that it is my responsibility to come up with language to expand the definition.

I want a definition that includes not only people in our workplace that are on the autism spectrum, but also those who bring other differences to their work. There are people here with social anxiety, attention deficits, obsessive/compulsive behaviours, learning disabilities. I want to ensure that all of them see themselves as included within our diversity policy.

So my question becomes, "Does neurodiversity refer exclusively to the autism spectrum, or is it a broad enough term to include other differences?"


Regardless of how "neurodiversity" is used either on Wrongplanet or elsewhere, to your committee it needs to mean all neurological differences. The semantics aren't important. The pragmatics are. Your workplace includes people with social anxiety, attention deficits etc. and you already stated that you want them included in the diversity policy along with yourself and any other AS people employed there. The important thing isn't how people on WrongPlanet use the word in posts. The important thing is what your workplace diversity policy will say, because it will become an important and enforceable document. For that reason alone, your definition that you present should include neurological conditions in general, not just AS.



21 Dec 2009, 2:18 pm

We should stat using the term ND now when we talk about people off the spectrum, NT's and ND's and then this place be a much better place. No more discrimination against NT's if we start using the term ND too. We're ND's. My husband is an ND.



PlatedDrake
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,365
Location: Piedmont Region, NC, USA

21 Dec 2009, 3:33 pm

<shrug> tendency of mine to be a bit too literal at times. Neuro and psycho are about the same in my mind, but Im open more accurate interpretations. Given neuro meaning, "brain," then yes, neurodiversity as word would work.



Mysty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,762

21 Dec 2009, 4:16 pm

Spokane_Girl wrote:
We should stat using the term ND now when we talk about people off the spectrum, NT's and ND's and then this place be a much better place. No more discrimination against NT's if we start using the term ND too. We're ND's. My husband is an ND.


No, because if we use ND for those on the spectrum, we are restricting neurodiversity to those who are different. To me, neurodiversity means people in general vary in their neurology. NTs too. Neurodiversity applies to NTs too.

Then again, ND could also stand for neurologically different.


_________________
not aspie, not NT, somewhere in between
Aspie Quiz: 110 Aspie, 103 Neurotypical.
Used to be more autistic than I am now.


21 Dec 2009, 5:05 pm

NO, I meant ND as in people with mental conditions. Not just us.



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 121,305
Location: In my own little country

21 Dec 2009, 5:38 pm

I think that the term should invlove all types of mental disabilities and disorders. I also think that every person on this planet is worthy of life, and that we should celebrate all human differences, no matter what they are. God don't make no crap.


_________________
The Family Schlager


Aietra
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 240
Location: New Zealand

22 Dec 2009, 4:02 am

Aren't we being a little persnickety here? I'd say neurodiversity can include anyone who wants to be included.