ThomasL wrote:
Then again, I don't know if that's so bad. It seems that my "friends" mainly liked to have me around to make fun of... I'm a pretty "good sport" about it, and can laugh at myself, but I really don't know what's good-natured kidding around and what's unhealthy. I suspect all of my friendships have been unhealthy.
I don't know... some great thinker said something like "hell is other people" and I paraphrased it to "people are hell", and that sounds about right to me. You never know what they're really thinking, or how they really regard you, or when they're going to hurt you, reject you, betray or abandon you... but it seems it's just a matter of time... give people enough time, and they'll prove that people are indeed hell.
In terms of
hell is other people i think your talking about Jean-Paul Sartre, I have not read much of him, but his philosophy is supposed to be interesting.
My initial definition of friendship was based on mutually assured destruction, like nuclear weapons in the cold war. If they entrust you with an important piece of information they do not want other people to know and you can do the same, then that is approximately friendship.
But i'm actually looking for a new definition for friendship, the old one maybe too strict. I actually had a colleague working on a project say
"you know we are friends right?", all I managed in response was a confused
"really?", not a good scenario.