DonkeyBuster wrote:
As dominantly verbal thinkers, do you still lack the emotional "labeling" of the thinking?
I find that in my visual thinking, there is generally little emotional content, unless its one of those interpersonal disasters. Just a general sense of pleasure being engaged in thinking.
Pretty much. I actually had to stop and think about what you meant by emotional "labeling" of thinking. It's like a dictionary in my head. Some things have rough sketches, but they require much more effort to deal with than the words. None of it has much emotional content. I have to connect the reactions of my body to the thoughts and events happening at the time to keep up with any emotions that decide to do their thing.
I can fairly specifically describe the workings of my thought process in extended metaphor. My brain is like a container of reactive fog. Most thought is a process of that fog forming words. The words are easy and logical and sensible. It takes significantly more effort to force my brain fog to condense into images, just like it's easier to render/load text on a website than images. Therefore, my brain only really uses image based thought when a simple, unclear image can be used to take the place of a significant number of words in the thought flow. My dreams are even pretty unclear. I know a lot of things in word form in my dreams that never resolves itself visually in any way.
Sucks too. I have incredible vision. I've always wanted a photographic memory, just to use my eyes to their full potential.
_________________
"Listen deeper to the music before you put it in a box" - Tyler the Creator - Sandwitches