Alice94 wrote:
Thanks for your replies. I took the test and got 125.
Although I'm not sure I honestly believe it, I thought I would get lower since I basically almost fail to function properly on a daily basis.
It's completely possible to be academically smart and disabled. Many people don't believe it, but it's true. One of the smartest people I know has such severe dyslexia that she can barely read at all. That's just the way it goes--you're really good at some things, really bad at others. I scored well on the IQ test, too, but I don't function much better than you would expect from someone with a mild intellectual disability--capable of living alone, but just barely, and needing help to maintain even that.
The trouble with being "smart", and people knowing it, is that they start to think that this means you don't need any help. And then you get left behind, and they think you are lazy. When, in reality, you can't do whatever it is that you're not doing.
Smart isn't one thing that you either are or aren't. IQ tests don't test how good you are at taking care of yourself. They correlate relatively well with academics, but there are a lot of things to life that you don't learn in school.
The things the IQ test measures are simple tasks that use abilities like thinking about words or shapes or numbers. It doesn't measure your ability to remember to pay a bill, your ability to negotiate with a repairman, your ability to cook your dinner, or your ability to deal with a job interview. From your IQ test result, I would expect you to be someone for whom learning academic subjects is relatively easy, at least if you are interested and in an environment where you can concentrate and learn things in your own way. And yet even then, there are probably parts of school that are quite difficult for you, depending on your skill set. For me, it's group work and organizing my efforts at completing major projects.
As more than one of my psychology professors have said, "Your IQ is a measure of how good you are at IQ tests." That's pretty much it. The relationship between IQ results and performance on a task is stronger for some tasks than others, of course, but IQ tests can only truly measure how good you are at those particular sub-tests on that particular day. And the farther away a task is from the ones you did on the IQ test, the less your IQ result has to say about how good you'll likely be at completing it.
Don't let them put you in a box labeled with your IQ score. Once they put you in that box, they like to seal it up and stamp it with some kind of standardized treatment plan that's likely to be totally inappropriate for your actual needs.