US Goverment official wants to segragate disabled

Page 1 of 1 [ 16 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

18 Jul 2018, 4:13 am

Talk Of Segregating People With Disabilities Alarms Members Of Congress

Quote:
A bipartisan group of lawmakers is looking for answers after a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.

Mary Lazare, who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living, allegedly made the controversial remarks during a keynote address last week at the Autism Society’s national conference in Bethesda, Md.

Shortly thereafter, Lazare issued a statement on the Administration for Community Living’s Twitter page appearing to backtrack.

I regret & apologize for my words at #ASAconf18,” the statement read. “ACL believes ppl w/disabilities have the right & choice to live in the community. We work to expand those opptys & are 100% committed to that mission. We also recognize Olmstead gives people the right to other choices.”

Talking points prepared for Lazare’s appearance at the Autism Society conference that were provided to Disability Scoop by the Administration on Community Living do not make any mention of segregation, but the agency acknowledged that Lazare improvised. There are believed to be no recordings of the speech.

Lazare is also said to have expressed similar sentiments to those shared at the Autism Society conference during another appearance earlier the same day at the National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities conference in Oxon Hill, Md.

The comments prompted four federal lawmakers to write to Lance Robertson who heads the Administration on Community Living, asking whether the agency remains committed to its mission which states that “all Americans — including people with disabilities and older adults — should be able to live at home with the supports they need, participating in communities that value their contributions.”

The lawmakers said they were told that Lazare said she believed the Supreme Court came to the wrong conclusion in the landmark Olmstead v. L.C. case, which affirmed the right of people with disabilities to access community-based living, and that she prefers segregated and institutional settings.

In addition, Lazare reportedly said she believed that a federal Medicaid rule outlining what types of settings qualify as community-based should be revisited, according to a letter from Reps. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., Gregg Harper, R-Miss., and Jim Langevin, D-R.I.

“As reported, your remarks were disturbing, create distrust and raise serious questions concerning your ability to effectively serve in your current position,” reads a separate letter from Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill.

Even Lazare’s apology, the lawmakers noted, indicated a misunderstanding of the Olmstead decision.

Olmstead “has nothing to do with maintaining choice and everything to do with viewing the segregation of people with disabilities as a violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act,” wrote the three House lawmakers in their letter.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


MrsPeel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2017
Age: 55
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,927
Location: Australia

18 Jul 2018, 4:34 am

Seems like a witch-hunt against someone offering an opinion.
Institutions do not necessarily have to be evil, and it worries me when one point of view is taken as so unquestionably right that it silences further debate.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

18 Jul 2018, 8:02 am

It is not a matter of silencing a comic for “offending” views or getting some guy fired because he wrote something “offensive” once on Facebook. This is critcizing a goverment official payed by taxpayers who could implement a policy in voilation of America’s high court. Criticizing government officials is our most basic right in a democracy.


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

18 Jul 2018, 8:09 am

Key point...

Quote:
... a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.
See that? It's only one top official who favors segregating disabled people, and that person is Mary Lazare, "... who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living."

It isn't the entire U.S. government. It's just one person. The title of this thread is click-bait.

(And I fell for it. :( )


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Last edited by Fnord on 18 Jul 2018, 8:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Esmerelda Weatherwax
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Age: 71
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,749

18 Jul 2018, 8:11 am

^^ good point, and we will see what the others believe as we observe what they tolerate, and how they *act* in response to this.


_________________
"I believe you find life such a problem because you think there are the good people and the bad people," said the man. "You're wrong, of course. There are, always and only, the bad people, but some of them are on opposite sides."
-- Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

18 Jul 2018, 8:13 am

Fnord wrote:
Key point...
Quote:
... a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.
See that? It's only one top official who favors segregating disabled people, and that person is Mary Lazare, "... who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living."

It isn't the entire U.S. government. It's just one person. The title of this thread is click-bait.

(And I fell for it. :( )


How is "US Goverment Official Wants To Segragate Disabled" misleading?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

18 Jul 2018, 9:15 am

EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Key point...
Quote:
... a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.
See that? It's only one top official who favors segregating disabled people, and that person is Mary Lazare, "... who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living." It isn't the entire U.S. government. It's just one person. The title of this thread is click-bait. (And I fell for it.)
How is "US Goverment Official Wants To Segragate Disabled" misleading?
Because there was no word 'Official' when I first clicked on it.


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

18 Jul 2018, 10:04 am

Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Key point...
Quote:
... a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.
See that? It's only one top official who favors segregating disabled people, and that person is Mary Lazare, "... who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living." It isn't the entire U.S. government. It's just one person. The title of this thread is click-bait. (And I fell for it.)
How is "US Goverment Official Wants To Segragate Disabled" misleading?
Because there was no word 'Official' when I first clicked on it.


I thought that might be the case, but there was no indication it had been edited.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

18 Jul 2018, 10:28 am

EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Key point...
Quote:
... a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.
See that? It's only one top official who favors segregating disabled people, and that person is Mary Lazare, "... who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living." It isn't the entire U.S. government. It's just one person. The title of this thread is click-bait. (And I fell for it.)
How is "US Goverment Official Wants To Segragate Disabled" misleading?
Because there was no word 'Official' when I first clicked on it.
I thought that might be the case, but there was no indication it had been edited.
There never is...


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

18 Jul 2018, 10:40 am

Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Key point...
Quote:
... a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.
See that? It's only one top official who favors segregating disabled people, and that person is Mary Lazare, "... who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living." It isn't the entire U.S. government. It's just one person. The title of this thread is click-bait. (And I fell for it.)
How is "US Goverment Official Wants To Segragate Disabled" misleading?
Because there was no word 'Official' when I first clicked on it.
I thought that might be the case, but there was no indication it had been edited.
There never is...


Is there not something at the bottom of the page?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,953
Location:      

18 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm

Tequila wrote:
Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Key point...
Quote:
... a top official at the federal agency responsible for community living reportedly said publicly that she favored “segregation” of people with disabilities.
See that? It's only one top official who favors segregating disabled people, and that person is Mary Lazare, "... who serves as principal deputy administrator for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Community Living." It isn't the entire U.S. government. It's just one person. The title of this thread is click-bait. (And I fell for it.)
How is "US Goverment Official Wants To Segragate Disabled" misleading?
Because there was no word 'Official' when I first clicked on it.
I thought that might be the case, but there was no indication it had been edited.
There never is...
Is there not something at the bottom of the page?
"© Copyright 2014 Wrong Planet"


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


Hollywood_Guy
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Nov 2017
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,283
Location: US

18 Jul 2018, 3:43 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
It is not a matter of silencing a comic for “offending” views or getting some guy fired because he wrote something “offensive” once on Facebook. This is critcizing a goverment official payed by taxpayers who could implement a policy in voilation of America’s high court. Criticizing government officials is our most basic right in a democracy.

I can agree with you on this because it's pretty bad hearing that kind of stuff from a federal official, and as a taxpayer I am really against using those dollars to support officials or legislation that support this kind of view.



Glflegolas
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2016
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 490
Location: NS, Canada

18 Jul 2018, 5:21 pm

I don't really go into politics if I can help it, specially not US politics, but honestly, in this day and age, I'm not alarmed by anything I read. If the US has a president who doesn't mind seperating kids from their parents then why would he care about segregating disabled people??


_________________
~Glflegolas, B.Sc.
The Colourblind Country Chemist & Tropical Tracker

Myers-Briggs personality: The Commander
Asperger's Quiz: 79/111, both neurodiverse and neurotypical traits present. AQ score: 23 Raads-r score: here


losingit1973
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

Joined: 29 Mar 2018
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 133
Location: Livermore, CA

18 Jul 2018, 8:49 pm

What makes this so disturbing is that an official in the right position can have a devastating effect until someone mounts enough cash to bring the matter before the courts.


_________________
RAADS-R Score 199
Aspie-Quiz Neurodiverse score: 141/200
Aspie-Quiz Neurotypical score: 70/200
AQ 42


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

19 Jul 2018, 9:18 am

Quote:
all Americans — including people with disabilities and older adults — should be able to live at home with the supports they need, participating in communities that value their contributions.”


What's wrong with this? How is this segregation? :?

What's wrong with having a community for the disabled too? We have communities for the retirement and no one has called that segregation. I thought we already had assisted living for the disabled where people with disabilities need and they have people there that go around and help them with daily things l like we do for the elderly who can still function but just need some daily assistance.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


green0star
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2016
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,415
Location: blah

19 Jul 2018, 2:15 pm

I'm not surprised that they would suggest doing something like this. Seems pretty slimy if you ask me ...