Do we still judge someone on their appearance ?
I remember coming across a video from 2012 titled 'Weird customer in Subway' where someone with a hidden camera was filming a woman who was ordering a sandwich and was distressed by the employees not wearing any gloves even though the guy was wrapping it up without touching the sandwich. It made me quite angry because from the comments I saw a lot of them were very judgemental about her behaviour and others were pointing out that it was possible she was on the autistic spectrum as she was very specific in what she wanted in the sandwich as well other traits I can't quite remember now. But it just made me angry that even in the 21st century 'normal' people will seem to find other people with a hidden disability or a mental health problem as a freak show exhibit to put on the internet for other 'normal' people to ridicule them. It seems just as judgemental about the appearance of for example, singer Susan Boyle because lots of people at first saw her as 'odd' and 'not the typical contestant to see on a TV talent show'.
It's especially grievous that women are criticised if they speak up about health and safety, or personal preferences, like that woman did, because they'll be labelled Karens. Women are being shamed by the media any time they attempt to express themselves, and this is especially true for women who may struggle with communication, become flustered, have OCD, or be prone to emotional dysregulation. Women who were taught for generations to speak up, or to feel confident in social situations, are now labelled Karens and hushed very adequately by mainstream society. I can't believe people stand for it.
Do we still judge on appearance? Yes, sadly. The world of ableism is alive and kicking.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles
We are a visual species, and we are "wired" to rely on visual impressions for our survival and social interactions.
If you do not like being judged for your appearance, then these are your options:
• Do not be seen.
• If you must be seen, then do not stand out.
• If you do stand out, then do so attractively.
• If you are unattractive, then learn to deal with the inevitable derision.
• If you cannot deal with the inevitable derision, then do not expect others to change.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
OutsideView
Veteran
Joined: 4 Oct 2017
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,022
Location: England ^not male but apparently you can't change it
...and judging them as prison inmates, for instance.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
^ This. Sometimes it's appropriate to judge someone by their appearance, and sometimes it's also a safe thing to do. If you're approached on the street by someone who comes off as someone who's drunk or taking drugs, will you play it safe and try to stay away from that person or will you treat them just like you'd treat everyone else just because there's a chance that the person's completely harmless after all? I wouldn't take that chance. If that means that I'm judging people unfairly then too bad, my safety matters to me more than other people's feelings.
As for the situation in the first post, it was wrong to laugh at that woman, regardless of if she was an NT or ND. She was simply caring about hygiene, which is important. I know some countries and areas have low hygiene standards, and people who made fun of that woman could have been from such places, but still.
Judging people correctly is always fair. Judging people incorrectly may not be fair, but when it comes to personal safety, errors on the side of caution are eminently fair when no one gets hurt.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
