Therapists Petition for NO Electroshock

Post Reply New Topic

WASHINGTON , Bill Myers , Judge Rotenberg Center
Dec 17, 2007 3:00 AM (8 days ago) by Bill Myers, The Examiner

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Advocates for the mentally disabled are lobbying the world’s largest psychologists’ group to ban the practice of electroshock therapy that is currently being used on D.C. children in a Massachusetts clinic, The Examiner has learned.

Since October, more than 250 therapists and activists have signed an online petition asking the D.C.-based American Psychological Association to condemn the shock therapy and other “aversive” treatments used on autistic and other disabled patients at the Judge Rotenberg Center in Canton, Mass.

The petition, addressed to APA Assistant Executive Director Lynn F. Bufka, reminds the 148,000-member association that it has already blasted the use of “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” on “enemy combatants” held by the U.S.

“We are advocating for people with autism, development differences and mental health challenges,” the petition states, “urgently entreating that they may be given the same respect with regard to human rights as alleged ‘Enemy Combatants’ or any other human beings.”
Examiner.com Related Articles:
Iraqi Assyrians cling to roots even far from home
Granddaughter of Ex-London PM Dies
Bush, Rice Concerned About Afghanistan
D.C.’s special education in distress, official says
Shock-therapy school defends practices

Bufka didn’t respond to numerous requests for comment.

The petition was started by Derrick Jeffries, a sufferer from Asperger’s Syndrome, and University of Delaware professor Nancy Weiss. It has gained online signatures from Australia to the United Kingdom to Silver Spring.

A condemnation from the APA would be a major blow to Rotenberg, the only school in the U.S. authorized to use “aversive” therapy. Once a practice is frowned upon by the APA, it becomes difficult for therapists to justify its use in courts.

Rotenberg is home to at least nine D.C. students and has been the subject of dozens of complaints for several years because of its harsh methods. It charges the District more than $227,000 per child per year for its services.

Rotenberg spokesman Ernest Corrigan couldn’t be reached for comment.

http://www.examiner.com/a-1108993~Therapists_ petition_for_no_electroshock.html

Electroshock is not a teaching tool. It's only real application is making people CONFESS! And the Geneva Convention crashed that party.

Down with Rotenburg!

I would sign the petition though would want to add the act of drugging kids into zombie-like states to the banned practices; apparently this is the worse alternative that brought the parents to consider electroshock in the first place.

It's not therapy, it's human expermentation.

... WHERE DO I SIGN!! ! THIS SO CALLED "SCHOOL" NEEDS A GOOD FEDERAL CEASE & DESIST LETTER

Not necessarily. There simply are ZERO effective treatments for the mentally ill - that are known to the masses - aside from druggings - so this was the alternative to that -and it was probably that or forced hospitalization and they just took the road less traveled hoping for hope.

A Call for Ethical and Unprejudiced Leadership and Practice in the Field
of Psychology

An Autism & Mental Health Community Letter

October 10, 2007

This letter is to the American Psychological Association (hereafter referred to as APA), and to all professionals in the field of psychology. This letter calls upon APA and professionals who adhere to the APA Code of Ethics to act in a manner that is ethical and consistent with that Code of Ethics. Two recent APA documents are relevant to this call to action. They are, the 2006 “Resolution Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment or punishment” (hereafter referred to as 2006 Resolution), and the 2007 “Reaffirmation of the American Psychological Association Position Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment” and Its Application to Individuals Defined in the United States Code as “Enemy Combatants”" (hereafter referred to as 2007 Resolution). With fervor, we are advocating for people with autism, developmental differences, and mental health challenges; urgently entreating that they may be given the same respect with regard to human rights as alleged “Enemy Combatants,” or any other human beings. As professionals who adhere to the APA Code of Ethics, nothing less than an unprejudiced stance in this matter should be considered acceptable.


Currently, children and young adults with autism, developmental differences, and mental health challenges are being treated in a manner that clearly meets the definition of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, as defined by the two previously mentioned APA documents. The Judge Rotenberg Educational Center (hereafter referred to as JRC) in Massachusetts has a long history of using electric shock, food deprivation and prolonged mechanical restraint, as well as other painful and dehumanizing aversive techniques.


The use of the phrase “effective treatment,” does not make such techniques humane or acceptable. Furthermore, attempting to justify them as “treatments” of “last resort” may not be completely accurate. It has been clearly demonstrated that positive behavioral approaches, based on a careful analysis of the functions dangerous or disruptive behaviors may be serving are as effective and more enduring than behavior change techniques based on pain and fear. JRC uses a device that they call the Graduated Electronic Decelerator (GED), to deliver painful electric shocks. Reporters, legislators and others who have experienced the 2-second shock from this device describe it as incredibly painful. A report from the New York State Educational Department noted that JRC was not only using electric shock for dangerous and self-injurious behaviors but also for behaviors that are benign or idiosyncratic such as “nagging, swearing and failure to maintain a neat appearance,” or “slouching in a chair.” The director of the Judge Rotenberg Center testified at a legislative hearing that one student received 5,300 electric shocks in one day. In his testimony, he stated that over a 24-hour period, this student, a teenager who weighed only 52 pounds, was subjected to an average of one shock every 16 seconds. During some periods, the student was automatically shocked every second if he lifted his hand off a paddle. A copy of the New York State Report can be found HERE: http://boston.com/news/daily/15/school_report.pdf and a myriad of additional information on the school and its practices can be found by googling the Judge Rotenberg Center.


Proponents of behaviorism have voiced their opposition to these practices. Although the Director of the Judge Rotenberg Center often defends his practices by stating that he was trained by B. F. Skinner, Dr. Skinner made it very clear that he did not condone such practices. At the age of 83, he was interviewed by Daniel Goleman of the New York Times. In an article published August 25th, 1987, titled, “Embattled Giant Of Psychology Speaks His Mind,” B. F. Skinner’s view is stated as–“The use of punishment is another issue Dr. Skinner still feels impassioned about. He is an ardent opponent of the use of punishment, such as spanking, or using ”aversives” -such as pinches and shocks - with autistic children. ”What’s wrong with punishments is that they work immediately, but give no long-term results,” Dr. Skinner said. ”The responses to punishment are either the urge to escape, to counterattack or a stubborn apathy. These are the bad effects you get in prisons or schools, or wherever punishments are used.” The complete article can be viewed HERE: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h ... nted=print


The 1965 experimental research of O. Ivar Lovaas, Benson Schaeffer, and James Q. Simmons, conducted at the University of California, Los Angeles, concluded that electric shock applications did not have enduring effectiveness. In conclusion, they questioned the need for shocking children with Autism by stating, “A basic question, then, is whether it is necessary to employ shock in accomplishing such an end or whether less drastic methods might suffice.” (Journal Of Experimental Research in Personality 1, 99-109 (1965))


A recent Mother Jones article about this institution began like this, “Rob Santana awoke terrified. He’d had that dream again, the one where silver wires ran under his shirt and into his pants, connecting to electrodes attached to his limbs and torso. Adults armed with surveillance cameras and remote-control activators watched his every move. One press of a button, and there was no telling where the shock would hit—his arm or leg or, worse, his stomach. All Rob knew was that the pain would be intense.”(Mother Jones, August 20, 2007).


A horror from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal? No, torture carried out in the name of treatment, right here in the State of Massachusetts, against the most vulnerable of our young people — and designed and implemented by Psychologists.


It is additionally noted that programs that are built around scientific knowledge and principles will generally welcome peer review and a continual improvement process. Currently and historically, JRC practices are remarkably deficient in these areas. As leaders in the field of psychology, and as professionals who are intolerant of torture, APA has an opportunity, if not an obligation, to demonstrate leadership in this matter. Please consider the following facts and arguments.


Section 1 of the American Psychological Association Code of Ethics, creates a standard of excellence in regards to the personal accountability of psychologists to their Code of Ethics. It also establishes a means for resolving professional ethical issues between psychologists and with organizations with which Psychologists may be affiliated.


Sub-Section 1.05 of the Code of Ethics covers the topic of Reporting Ethical Violations. This sub-section related to reporting, places a grave responsibility upon APA members to report apparent ethical violations that have “substantially harmed or are likely to substantially harm a person or organization.” This reporting “may include referral to state or national committees on professional ethics, to state licensing boards, or to the appropriate institutional authorities.”


Within the 2007 Reaffirmation, reference is made to the 2006 Resolution, stating emphatically that it is “a comprehensive and foundational position applicable to all individuals, in all settings and in all contexts without exception.” We are in agreement with this position.

We are pleading with APA psychologists, and all psychologists who independently and voluntarily follow the APA Code of Ethics, to consider that the 2006 Resolution is inclusive of all human beings. We ask that it be applied toward those who are receiving treatment/services related to symptoms associated with autism, developmental differences, and mental health challenges, including such that may cause or contribute to self-injurious behavior. This letter is an earnest appeal to APA leadership and all professionals in the field of psychology to demonstrate ethical practices and adhere to the principles of the 2006 Resolution and the 2007 Reaffirmation in opposing the use of skin-shock and food deprivation that are currently being administered as “treatment” for self-injurious behavior, aggressive behavior, and other behaviors that are being considered as precursors. Skin-shock or food deprivation under any other context, or being administered to any other population segment would be considered an inhumane form of punishment that in reality is truly torture. According to the 2006 Resolution, there can be no exception for this type of degrading treatment.

Although there are some children and young adults who are able to communicate how they have been “substantially harmed by a person or organization,” there are many others who are unable to do so. Even those young people with the ability to communicate how they are being harmed are virtually unheard. Regardless of the individual’s ability to communicate and describe torture and its physical, mental and emotional effect upon them, this type of “treatment,” is still inherently wrong. Is it not the responsibility of a professional or any human being to take action when they are personally aware of acts that are inhumane and degrading forms of torture?

At the JRC this “treatment” is being authorized under court order. While Judges may have extensive expertise within the framework of law, they are reliant upon the testimony of experts (in these cases, Psychologists) to assist them in making decisions. Experts within the field of psychology need to see an example of leadership from organizations such as APA. Good leadership provides guidance and constraints in all areas that are conducive to professionalism and best practices.

In conclusion, we are respectfully appealing to APA members and leadership on the basis of professionalism and unprejudiced application of your own code of ethics, and consistent with your 2006 Resolution and 2007 Reaffirmation, to formally and specifically declare your position regarding the use of skin-shock “treatments,” food deprivation, and any other aversives that inflict pain or deprive basic human rights at JRC or elsewhere. We are calling upon APA members to apply the Code which condemns the treatment that is currently taking place at JRC.

We respectfully request that the APA send this letter to its members, post it on their website and/or publish it in a newsletter or other publication that reaches its full membership. We request that the APA as a professional organization, and as professional individuals actively and vociferously advocate for best practices while opposing that which is torture. We furthermore request that the APA, as an organization, make a formal and specific declaration of its stance in this matter and exercise appropriate discipline, thereby demonstrating that the Code of Ethics will be applied without prejudice. Your example in this will be a voice of hope for those who have been locked away, subjected to daily torture and unseen and unheard for too long.


Written and Presented by: Derrick Jeffries (Person with Asperger’s Syndrome) and Nancy Weiss (Co-Director, The National Leadership Consortium on Developmental Disabilities, Center for Disabilities Studies, University of Delaware)

To sign on, you have to send an email to Derrick Jeffries, asking him to put your name on the APA petition: derrick_jeffries@bestmail.us

The following individuals and organizations endorse this message:

1. Bernard Cooney, Ph.D.,Assistant Professor Sp. Ed.
Le Moyne College, Education Department, Syracuse, NY

2. Stephen Drake,Research Analyst
http://notdeadyetnewscommentary.blogspot.com/

3. Not Dead Yet, Advocacy Organization
Forest Park, IL

4. Suzanne M. Swindell, M.S.Ed.
Resource Teacher, Office of Sp. Ed.
Baltimore County Public Schools

5. Lori Noto, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT

6. Strengthening Our System, Inc., Human Services Agency
Floyd, VA

7. Rita B. Thuot, Director
Gaston Residential Services, Non-Profit Service Provider

8. Mary C. Cerreto, Ph.D.

9. APA Member, Associate Professor of Family Medicine
Boston University Medical Center

10. Douglas Biklen,Dean and Professor
School of Education, Syracuse University

11. Debbie Gilmer, M.Ed.,Associate Director
Maine Support Network,Western Maine Partnership, UMF

12. Kim McConaughy M.S., Behavior Analyst
State of Minnesota, Community Support Services

13. Debra Rezendes,Virginia Tech Autism Clinic

14. Amy Wrenn

15. Greg Scott

16. Kate Dempsey

17. Tonda S. Stillwell
Gastonia, NC

18. Diane Coleman, President
Not Dead Yet

19. Linda M. Bambara, Ed.D.
Professor of Special Education
Department of Education and Human Services, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA

20. Timothy P. Knoster Ed.D.

21. Colleen Horton, Parent
Austin, TX

22. Sheila Collector, Behavior Specialist
Dept of Special Education, Howard County Public Schools

23. Sondra Williams, Person with Autism, Parent
Ohio

24. Susan Fitzmaurice, Parent, Disability Advocate
http://disabledsoapbox.blogspot.com/200 ... diced.html
IDEAAS

25. Teddy Fitzmaurice, Self-Advocate, Person with Down Syndrome
Teddy’s Ts

26. Lou Brown, Professor Emeritus
University of Wisconsin

27. Howard Renensland, Concerned Citizen

28. Cheryl Trommater, Advocate

29. Alison Hymes, M.S.
Psychiatric Survivor and Advocate
http://hymes.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/p ... abilities/
Degree in Counseling Psychology

30. Adapt Montana
Disability Rights Group

31. Not Dead Yet, Montana
Advocacy Organization

32. Marsha Katz, Person with a Disability, Family Member, Concerned Citizen
State Organizer for Adapt Montana and Not Dead Yet, Montana

33. Kitsune J Scott, Concerned Citizen
Portland, OR

34. Mike Stanton, Parent, Member of the National Autistic Society
http://mikestanton.wordpress.com/
U.K.

35. Mary Johnson, Disability Rights Advocate, Author of Disability Rights Books
Advocado Press

36. Kevin Leitch
http://www.leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk - Autism News and Opinion
U.K.

37. Jamison Dupree, Person with Muscular Dystrophy, Concerned Citizen
Mobile, Alabama

38. Janet Conklin, Autism Specialist, Lane ESD
Eugene, OR

39. Roy Probeyahn
South Manor, N.Y.

40. Ragged Edge Online
Disability Rights Website

41. Advocado Press
Disability Rights Publications

42. Hugh Sheridan, Parent of Autistic Child
Needham, MA

43. Joan Sheridan, Parent of Autistic Child
Needham, MA

44. D’Arcy Sheridan, Autistic Person
Needham, MA

45. Sandra Weiss Knepp, MA,Executive Director
Bloomin’ Youth, Growing Independence in Youth with Autism

46. Samuel J. Ashley

47. Ellen Ewing, Service Coordinator/Family Consultant / Parent of a Child with Developmental Disabilities
WIDE HORIZONS - A Family Support Program
Yamhill County, OR Developmental Disabilities

48. Richard J Pratt, Executive Director
Transitional Living Services of Onondaga County, Inc., NY

49. Anne Carpenter, Person with Autism

50. Beth Mathis, Concerned Citizen

51. Dan Kennedy, CEO
Human Life of Washington

52. Dr. Sally Rogow

53. Human Life of Washington
Bellevue, WA

54. Center for Life Principles
A Project of Human Life Ed. Foundation

55. Mary E. Donovan
No. Easton, MA

56. Ironsides

57. Donna Libby, Lane Regional Autism Specialist
Oregon

58. The ARC of the United States
Authorized by Sue Swenson (CEO)

59. The Autism National Committee (Autcom)
Dedicated to “Social Justice for All Citizens with Autism”
Authorized by Sharisa Kochmeister (President)

60. Sharisa Kochmeister, BA Sociology/ Psychology
Grad. Denver Univ., 2004, former user of facilitated communication, current user of augmentative communication; former victim, current victor
The Autism National Committee (President)

61. Phil Schwarz
Director, Autism National Committee, Director, Massachusetts Chapter, Autism Society of America, Vice President, Asperger’s Association of New England

62. Gerald (Jerry) Newport
Author/Advocate with Asperger Syndrome
http://www.realmozart-whale.com/ Co-Author, Mozart and the Whale, and other books

63. Margo A. Williams
Director, Autism National Committee, Treasurer, Autism Society of Washtenaw, Mother, to wonderful child with autism

64. Denise Fletcher
Psychiatric Survivor

65. Sandra McClennen, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist in Michigan and CPQ by ASPPB, Vice-President, Autism National Committee

66. Estee Klar-Wolfond
Founder/Executive Director
The Autism Acceptance Project

67. Rikkii Clarent, School Psychologist

68. Karen J. Zimbrich, M.Ed., Life Member of TASH
Resident of Massachusetts,

69. Nancy Donahoe, Person with Autism

70. Mira Davis-Kelly
The Autism Acceptance Project

71. The Autism Acceptance Project
Advocacy Organization, Promoting Acceptance and Accommodations for People with Autism.
Approved by Estee Klar-Wolford & Mira Davis-Kelly

72. Kristina Chew, Ph.D.,Assistant Professor of Classics, Co-director, Honors Program, Advisor, Special Scholarships and Graduate Studies, Department of Modern and Classical Languages Saint Peter’s College, Jersey City, N.J.

73. Navidad Arnett, Parent of a Person with Autism

74. Melissa Gordon
Parent of a Child with Asperger’s AND Concerned Citizen

75. Connie Lapin, Advocate, Community Activist and Parent of an amazing son (39) with the severe challenge of autism

76. Harvey A. Lapin, D.D.S., Dentist, advocate, parent

77. Laura Mercier

78. Vera Lingonis, Concerned Citizen (N.Z.)
Wellington, New Zealand

79. Susan Yuan, Ph.D., Associate Director Center on Disability and Community Inclusion, University of Vermont, Parent of a 33 year old man with Angelman Syndrome, Center on Disability and Community Inclusion
University of Vermont

80. Autism Spectrum Differences Institute of New England

Has anyone read this article on it?

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature ... shock.html