Dissecting a Thimerosal Study

Post Reply New Topic

(NewsTarget) They're at it again. The campaign to make people believe that vaccines and their preservative, thimerosal, are safe is in full swing. The usual technique of a pseudo-scientific test is being used, with the medical system jumping on the bandwagon. The upshot of the reports is always the same: to belittle the legitimate fear of serious risks. What's the hoopla? Susan Jeffrey, news editor of Medscape.com, has produced an article touting "Weight of Evidence Against Thimerosal Causing
Neuropsychological Deficits”.

On reading the article, it sounds convincing. To top it off, Dr. Paul A. Offitt is quoted as calling the issue of thimerosal a “cautionary tale”. He refers to a “cottage industry of charlatans offering false hope, partly in the form of mercury-chelating agents” to help children with autism. Pretty strong statement, isn't it? The first point that should be made is that the study in question specifically does not include children with autism.

The issue on which Offitt is making his point has absolutely nothing to do with the study. Who is Dr. Offitt? He serves on the scientific advisory board of Merck and holds a patent on RotaTeq, a vaccine against rotavirus gastroenteritis. It's produced by Merck and has been noted for causing intussuseption, which is intestinal twisting, a life-threatening condition. Merck advocates giving this vaccine to babies aged 6 to 12 weeks, and it is now being routinely pushed by doctors. This new vaccine, with its life-threatening risk, is being given to prevent a disease that usually lasts from 3-8 days.

Death from rotavirus gastroenteritis is almost unknown in the U.S. and common only where access to adequate nutrition or clean water is an issue. So, the expert quoted has made a statement that has nothing to do with the study and he holds a patent on a dangerous vaccine being pushed on tiny babies for a disease that holds almost no risk if they're healthy. Is this the sort of person whose opinion on the issue—especially considering the fact that his statement has nothing to do with the study in question—is worthwhile? What does the study actually say?

read on: http://www.newstarget.com/022237.html

It's understood that this is the way things are - and that's fine. It's the ole bell curve don't you know? Those behind are the ones still asleep and they have but 5 senses, they work with reptilian brains, are the spiritually sleeping, cloaked in darkness and working in darkness - darkness being their energy. Then there are those that are awakened at the top of the curve, the ones making all the noise, received 6 senses, awakened, yelling at the top of our lungs Lisa Simpson style, spiritually brightened with light coming in and from us. Then there are the spiritual masters, light years away from us, who set examples to us, who teach us in our dreams and who give us direction, being there as our beacons and connectors to ourSelves. Guides. Teachers. Angels.

There's nothing to worry about. It's all according to Plan.

Hang in there.