nanotechnology
Apparently some amazing things can be done with this new, amazing technology.
We have some nanobots now but they are really primitive/experimental. I've read that in the future the nanobots will be sophisticated enough to allow us to have near perfect control over matter. As good control over matter as we do over information today. Now that would be fascinating - a world full of general assemblers.
Other benefits include a way to cure genetic dieases (by going in cell by cell and altering the genetic code of a person - this could go as far as to removing the dieases from the reproductive cells thus the fixes would be inherited) and cures for viruses (the nanobots could just go into the bloodstream and disassemble the viruses before they have a chance to infect a cell for example).
There are some major drawbacks though. I wonder who else knows about this?
I foresee a time in which nanites become a natural part of the 'human' body, myself. Not only will they be our constant companions, keeping us healthy, but we will transmit nanites when we breed, and the new human will grow up with nanites in its system, which produce more nanites as the child grows, just as if they were a perfectly natural part of their body.
As for the drawbacks... I don't see any except the potential for use in biological warfare, but meh, almost any technology has the potential to be used as weapons. We already are able to genetically engineer bacteria and viruses, so there'd not really be that great an additional threat from nanotechnology.
Like the borg........
More seriously, like the way we transfer bacteria and other symbotes now? Hmm...
Not really a bad idea. But nanobots/nanites can do so much more than merely keeping us healthy ... they can contstruct and mantain and repair new technology inside of us (such as computer chips). Fascinating isn't it? Hmm....
Well there is the "Grey Goo" senario .. but the good news is that, at least in the beginning, it looks like this sort of thing is avoidable as an accident (tho a terrorist with the right tech could still certainly try it out).
The drawback is profound; people will lose their sense of purpose.
Nanotechnology will potentially enable humans to live forever if they wanted to. Nanobots within the body will prevent and destroy invaders and cancers better than any immune system can, and they can condition cell development so that their daugher cell successors can be just as active and effective, for example. People would be able to change physical characteristics of their body such as their hair color/eye color at will. I've heard that using nano-scale air vacuums on the body surface will make it possible to fly. All kinds of crazy things are possible that have only been possible in dreams.
This has a huge downside to it as well. Anybody who has ever played "God Mode" in a video game knows that after a short while, they've done everything and there is nothing else to do, and they become very bored. The same goes for a nano-enhanced human. If a human is able to do everything it could have ever imagined or dreamed of, it will do all of those things but will soon become very bored and miserable with a life with no new things to look forward to.
What makes life interesting are challenges and experiences that lie ahead. Ambition and goals keep people looking forward to their future. Such developments in nanotech would destroy the concept of future experiences and essentially hand all the fruits of life and heaven to you at once. With no challenges, every day would become exactly the same and people would go insane.
Life is characterized by constant change and death is characterized by constant sameness. It nano yields sameness from day to day, then what happens to the need for change that characterizes all living?
I guess my stance on the situation is, nanotech can be nice but it should have a strict limit for the sake of keeping the fun intact.
Nanotechnology will potentially enable humans to live forever if they wanted to. Nanobots within the body will prevent and destroy invaders and cancers better than any immune system can, and they can condition cell development so that their daugher cell successors can be just as active and effective, for example. People would be able to change physical characteristics of their body such as their hair color/eye color at will. I've heard that using nano-scale air vacuums on the body surface will make it possible to fly. All kinds of crazy things are possible that have only been possible in dreams.
This has a huge downside to it as well. Anybody who has ever played "God Mode" in a video game knows that after a short while, they've done everything and there is nothing else to do, and they become very bored. The same goes for a nano-enhanced human. If a human is able to do everything it could have ever imagined or dreamed of, it will do all of those things but will soon become very bored and miserable with a life with no new things to look forward to.
What makes life interesting are challenges and experiences that lie ahead. Ambition and goals keep people looking forward to their future. Such developments in nanotech would destroy the concept of future experiences and essentially hand all the fruits of life and heaven to you at once. With no challenges, every day would become exactly the same and people would go insane.
Life is characterized by constant change and death is characterized by constant sameness. It nano yields sameness from day to day, then what happens to the need for change that characterizes all living?
I guess my stance on the situation is, nanotech can be nice but it should have a strict limit for the sake of keeping the fun intact.
An interesting point and one that makes some sense. However, if there is an opportunity for immortality then it should be taken. Human potential is almost limitless given enough time and with immortality we could have much much more things possible than we would think. Has man colonized the other heavenly bodies in our solar system? No. Has man colonized the sea? No. Has man reached his full potential? No. Our challenges come from outside and it is doubtful that we will ever master this universe but with immortality we would not only have this quest as a goal but also a means to keep our best and brightest minds at work. Besides, I like god mode.... I tend to play games to see where they go, not so much for the challenges but to see the plot instead. Anyway, my point is that even immortals have futures and challenges and immortality would be an excellent way to make the most use out of the best people.
Anyway, I like the idea of nanotechnology and would not like to see it held back by anything. It shows potential and although I tend to think that its importance is over-emphasized, I do think that it will help us build a smaller computer or smaller whatever the heck we need. It will probably have some effects on all of our technology.
Yes, but the ultimate goal of technology is a state of perfection. Assuming that human potential grows, all of those goals such as colonizing other worlds and discovering secrets of life the universe will be achieved. Once this occurs, what would do next?
But who knows, really. It might make sense, but the infinity of space and time might make the state of perfection impossible to reach.
Maybe the universe has a built in failsafe to prevent perfection from being reached.
Who knows?
Grey Goo... that's nothing major. Pink Goo is alot worse
Making a nanoswarm which could eat everything and make more nanites which eat everything would be unfeasable. Like lifeforms (and they would be a form of life, sort of), they wouyld have to be specialized to some extent or another. And there's ways to protect against nanites (blue goo, foot-thick synthesized diamond, etc...)
Nomaken
Veteran
Joined: 9 Jun 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,058
Location: 31726 Windsor, Garden City, Michigan, 48135
Due to a rather long list of concepts, benefits, and drawbacks i will sum up the future of nanontechnology with this: Nanotechnology's gonna be nifty.
_________________
And as always, these are simply my worthless opinions.
My body is a channel that translates energy from the universe into happiness.
I either express information, or consume it. I am debating which to do right now.
While I realise that I have to be patient, I can't wait for nanotechnology to reach 'maturehood'. As said, it will definitely raise some ethic issues somewhere in the future but it can help us dealing with some concrete problems.
In fact, even the cosmetics industry took that last statement very serious, as there currently among the greastest producers of nanomolecules in the world.
Maybe if people were immortal we'd start thinking more long-term for a change. So many of our problems are caused by short-term thinking, especially environmental issues ("I'll be dead before the ice caps melt, why should I care?")
_________________
Quantum Mechanics -- the dreams stuff is made of
That is actually a really, really good point. It would be really nice, too. I'm sick and tired of the "I'll be gone by the time this becomes a problem" mentality most people, and the scariest part is how it's being passed on to the younger generations. There was a time when it seemed like my generation, at least, gave a damn about cleaning up the messes left by prior ones and trying to preserve the world for future ones, but that all fell apart in the late '90s as (by my best guess) most of my generation decided "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Human near immortality should make people a lot more careful about the future, though I worry that people will just end up thinking "well, nanotech solved many of our problems, so some new tech will come along and solve any problems we create."
As for the loss of purpose... I disagree that there would be a loss of purpose. The reason god-moding in games gets old fast is because you're still limited to the frameworks within the game. If you were actually godlike, it would be rather difficult to get bored, becuse as soon as one thing bores you, you can try something new. Humans possess possibly limitless creative capacity, from my experience. Also, as we advance, we could find new ways to deal with potential boredom. Most importantly, if we do not isolate ourselves, we will be able to experience the work of others, and unless we stopped reproducing entirely, one would likely never experience the work of everyone, so there would always be something new.
I hope this nano technology reaches maturity and I have enough money to be able to afford it to be able to live forever before I die. Honestly with the ammount of potentional of things I could do if I never had to worry about time.
I bet I could even by then if nanotechnology was that advanced skip sleep because there would be some way for me tobe able to stay awake for ever and just have the nanotechnology restoring my system.
I think the that the sole goal of technology in my mind is to gain immortality. Immortality isn't like any thing differen't in your mind changes its not like all of a suddened you become bored for some reason. Its just like life as you know it now continues and you just don't cease to be.
Is it really so bad to just no want to die?
Nomaken
Veteran
Joined: 9 Jun 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,058
Location: 31726 Windsor, Garden City, Michigan, 48135
Well i wouldn't call it bad, but it can be kind of foolish to want what you'll never have.
And personally i've never been dead before so i can't say i know i wouldn't enjoy it.
_________________
And as always, these are simply my worthless opinions.
My body is a channel that translates energy from the universe into happiness.
I either express information, or consume it. I am debating which to do right now.
That's kinda my philosophy on it. I want to have a choice of when I cease to exist. I don't want to just lose my existence before I'm ready.
As for wanting what we can never have... it's good to have hope, at least. Not good to want it and not work towards it, and let the want for it bring you down. Otherwise, it does more good than harm.
