MEME TIME
NoNameRockBand
Veteran
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,396
Location: Somewhere in the U.S.
And the horse on which they are traveling???
Uh is there a screw lose somewhere?
_________________
Worry you should, if that is what you want to do.
Otherwise, just enjoy life, unless you're not into that kinda thing or you have persecution mania.
@_@ I think I'm persecuting myself.
AFC who likes KFC
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
And the horse on which they are traveling???
Uh is there a screw lose somewhere?
'...and the horse you rode in on' is the translation.
But understand: you attack our Faith, we attack your faith.
I am reminded of Thomas Huxley's response to Sam Wilberforce when Wilberforce snidely asked him whether it was his grandmother or his grandfather's side he was descended from the ape.
I put it to you in paraphrased format, as it applies to you:
If I were asked to choose as an ancestor between a lowly, miserable ape, and a guy who was endowed with great gifts by nature and persists in using them to ridicule and belittle others, I choose the ape every time.
And you, iamnotaparakeet, you and your sister are on notice. Aridar posted only four or five of those raptor Jesus pictures. You have posted far more than your fair share of retaliatory images, and they were done out of spite, and vindictiveness. You obviously aren't good enough Christians to turn the other cheek.
_________________
(No longer a mod)
On sabbatical...
NoNameRockBand
Veteran
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,396
Location: Somewhere in the U.S.
And the horse on which they are traveling???
Uh is there a screw lose somewhere?
'...and the horse you rode in on' is the translation.
But understand: you attack our Faith, we attack your faith.
I am reminded of Thomas Huxley's response to Sam Wilberforce when Wilberforce snidely asked him whether it was his grandmother or his grandfather's side he was descended from the ape.
I put it to you in paraphrased format, as it applies to you:
If I were asked to choose as an ancestor between a lowly, miserable ape, and a guy who was endowed with great gifts by nature and persists in using them to ridicule and belittle others, I choose the ape every time.
And you, iamnotaparakeet, you and your sister are on notice. Aridar posted only four or five of those raptor Jesus pictures. You have posted far more than your fair share of retaliatory images, and they were done out of spite, and vindictiveness. You obviously aren't good enough Christians to turn the other cheek.
actually I only posted two. if you are going to put my brother's blame on me then what is the point of posting at all?
_________________
Worry you should, if that is what you want to do.
Otherwise, just enjoy life, unless you're not into that kinda thing or you have persecution mania.
@_@ I think I'm persecuting myself.
AFC who likes KFC
NoNameRockBand
Veteran
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,396
Location: Somewhere in the U.S.
Two is enough. Plus, you called Aridarr, and/or her pictures ret*d.
1.I did not attack Airidarr personally.
2. If it's ok for her to attack my religion, then it's ok for me or anyone else to attack any religion.
3. the number of post and/or memes is irrelevant as to the quality of retaliation, as you put it.
4. it seems by your example to by quite alright to attack people personally anyway, however I have not done so and neither has my brother.
5.Attacking organized religion, as you have done so numerous times before, and attacking philosophical naturalism should be no different.
6.Should we just let people walk all over us when what we hold true is challenged? Should we not take up the challenge?
for now this is all I have to say.
Beth
_________________
Worry you should, if that is what you want to do.
Otherwise, just enjoy life, unless you're not into that kinda thing or you have persecution mania.
@_@ I think I'm persecuting myself.
AFC who likes KFC
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
But understand: you attack our Faith, we attack your faith.
I put it to you in paraphrased format, as it applies to you:
If I were asked to choose as an ancestor between a lowly, miserable ape, and a guy who was endowed with great gifts by nature and persists in using them to ridicule and belittle others, I choose the ape every time.
Besides the point the ape quote is fictional, your preference as it overrides veritology is noted.
So you have not only defended Aridarr's action, insulted my sister and I personally, put us on notice for defending our beliefs, but your also insinuating that we have violated the commands of Christ. I don't believe this nonsense coming from so smart a person as yourself. However, if you persist, I shall report you and if WP approves of your actions we may seek legal action.
1.I did not attack Airidarr personally.
2. If it's ok for her to attack my religion, then it's ok for me or anyone else to attack any religion.
3. the number of post and/or memes is irrelevant as to the quality of retaliation, as you put it.
4. it seems by your example to by quite alright to attack people personally anyway, however I have not done so and neither has my brother.
5.Attacking organized religion, as you have done so numerous times before, and attacking philosophical naturalism should be no different.
6.Should we just let people walk all over us when what we hold true is challenged? Should we not take up the challenge?
for now this is all I have to say.
Beth
1. It is hard to tell.
2. She did not attack your religion with malice aforethought, but rather in facetiousness.
3. Actually, it is, as you show a lack of willingness to use any other argument.
4. You have done so to me in the past. Besides, my first message in this little saga was not a personal attack but a reproach. I was pointing out that you weren't qualified to judge anyone or anything as ret*d.
5. If you attack science, do so on proper terms. Science and religion fighting each other on a field of logic and reason, and religion goes down with internal injuries.
6. Do it elsewhere. Settle it privately. This is for all reasonable memes.
_________________
(No longer a mod)
On sabbatical...
But understand: you attack our Faith, we attack your faith.
I put it to you in paraphrased format, as it applies to you:
If I were asked to choose as an ancestor between a lowly, miserable ape, and a guy who was endowed with great gifts by nature and persists in using them to ridicule and belittle others, I choose the ape every time.
Besides the point the ape quote is fictional, your preference as it overrides veritology is noted.
I'm just saying an ape is a better person morally than you are. As for the quote being fictional: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Thomas_Huxley
So you have not only defended Aridarr's action, insulted my sister and I personally, put us on notice for defending our beliefs, but your also insinuating that we have violated the commands of Christ. I don't believe this nonsense coming from so smart a person as yourself. However, if you persist, I shall report you and if WP approves of your actions we may seek legal action.
Not for defending your beliefs, but for going immediately on a retaliatory attack that has little rational basis. And yes, I do insinuate that you have violated the commands of Christ.
As for seeking legal action, it further shows that you are about as far from Christian values as you are, geographically speaking, from me.
_________________
(No longer a mod)
On sabbatical...
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
1.I did not attack Airidarr personally.
2. If it's ok for her to attack my religion, then it's ok for me or anyone else to attack any religion.
3. the number of post and/or memes is irrelevant as to the quality of retaliation, as you put it.
4. it seems by your example to by quite alright to attack people personally anyway, however I have not done so and neither has my brother.
5.Attacking organized religion, as you have done so numerous times before, and attacking philosophical naturalism should be no different.
6.Should we just let people walk all over us when what we hold true is challenged? Should we not take up the challenge?
for now this is all I have to say.
Beth
1. It is hard to tell.
2. She did not attack your religion with malice aforethought, but rather in facetiousness.
3. Actually, it is, as you show a lack of willingness to use any other argument.
4. You have done so to me in the past. Besides, my first message in this little saga was not a personal attack but a reproach. I was pointing out that you weren't qualified to judge anyone or anything as ret*d.
5. If you attack science, do so on proper terms. Science and religion fighting each other on a field of logic and reason, and religion goes down with internal injuries.
6. Do it elsewhere. Settle it privately. This is for all reasonable memes.
1. No it's not. "that" and "you" are entirely different words.
2. It doesn't matter how she did it, she opened up the door to this topic.
3. That's appeal to ignorance, don't try it again.
4. "Hard to tell." Especially as you're always speaking in Latin.
5. Naturalism isn't science, it is bullocks.
6. You have the right to say that, but you also have the right to restrict such offensive things as Arridar posted. Quit taking sides as you have from the start.
iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius
But understand: you attack our Faith, we attack your faith.
I put it to you in paraphrased format, as it applies to you:
If I were asked to choose as an ancestor between a lowly, miserable ape, and a guy who was endowed with great gifts by nature and persists in using them to ridicule and belittle others, I choose the ape every time.
Besides the point the ape quote is fictional, your preference as it overrides veritology is noted.
I'm just saying an ape is a better person morally than you are. As for the quote being fictional: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Thomas_Huxley
Another judgmental insult from you...
So you have not only defended Aridarr's action, insulted my sister and I personally, put us on notice for defending our beliefs, but your also insinuating that we have violated the commands of Christ. I don't believe this nonsense coming from so smart a person as yourself. However, if you persist, I shall report you and if WP approves of your actions we may seek legal action.
Not for defending your beliefs, but for going immediately on a retaliatory attack that has little rational basis. And yes, I do insinuate that you have violated the commands of Christ.
As for seeking legal action, it further shows that you are about as far from Christian values as you are, geographically speaking, from me.
More insult and judging. Should criminals be let get away with crime? "Turn the other cheek" you quote, but letting you get away with your partiality is wrong. We are not carpets.
Now, I had already said I wasn't going to be posting anymore, as this is not on PPR where my religion is relegated to live, but you had to come, insult, and threaten us. You are out of line and you should not be a moderator.




