Page 2 of 3 [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

vulcanpastor
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 38
Location: Minneapolis, MN

27 Apr 2008, 12:01 am

Wow, another pastor! How cool!

I tend to like Taize because it repeats and there is time for silence. Overall, I tend to like liturgical worship services because they tend to be highly structured and ritualized. I grew up in evangelical and charismatic churches that had none of those and they drove me crazy.

When I went to seminary and came in contact with liturgical worship, it was as if I had come home.

We should talk more. I'd love to share stories about Aspergers and the ministry.

Dennis
Minneapolis, MN



delia43
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 39

03 May 2008, 10:27 pm

I'd like to third Taize.

Another spritual practice I resonate with is lectio divina, where a reader of scripture reads a passage, picks one detail to focus on, and then meditates on that detail. It does not necessarily have to be about "the point" of the passage, but just how God speaks to an individual heart through a particular, perhaps "unimportant" detail.

Attended a Quaker meeting a while ago and loved it. Found it incredibly healing to be allowed to be in a roomful of people almost glowing with the presence of God, and not expected to speak or "perform." But silence of all kinds is good.

But I'm nearly allergic to "passing the peace." It makes me feel far from peaceful! :wink:



Social_Fantom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,908
Location: Trapped outside of the space time continuum

03 May 2008, 10:50 pm

I like to hear a good sermon, one from a preacher that really knows what he is talking about.


_________________
So simple, it's complicated


ClosetAspy
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 361

04 May 2008, 7:48 pm

I was raised Catholic but I have explored other Christian denominations . . . Personally, I prefer the formality of liturgical worship. I don't have the sensory issues other individuals have so being in a church environment generally doesn't cause problems. However, several other people raised the issue of noisy children being distracting and I agree. I also don't like it when children are allowed to run around the church. One, I wasn't raised that way, and two, some of us are not as steady on our feet as others. I get real nervous when I am in any kind of setting where children are running loose (unless it is a playground designed for that purpose). The reason is I am not well coordinated, and a small child dashing in front of me is likely to make me lose my balance. PARENTS -- PLEASE TAKE NOTE: Seniors with poor eyesight and poor coordination are especially vulnerable to falls, they can't see your little ones until it is almost too late. And a fall could mean a broken hip and all that implies.

My other concern is not so much the service itself, but with the general relationship of church to society. There are churches which tend to be socially isolating. Some are very open about it and others not. For some people on the spectrum this might be a good thing; for others, it may only increase their natural tendency to withdraw and thus handicap them even more when it comes to functioning out in the world. And, paradoxically, there are some people who are probably better off not going to church. They are like alcoholics in a bar, this is not a good environment for them. I believe people on the spectrum are more at risk for becoming addicted to religion (the so-called fanatics), and therefore may need some special handling. Unfortunately the church as a whole seems to be in denial about this problem.



Zonder
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,081
Location: Sitting on my sofa.

04 May 2008, 8:04 pm

ClosetAspy wrote:
And, paradoxically, there are some people who are probably better off not going to church. They are like alcoholics in a bar, this is not a good environment for them. I believe people on the spectrum are more at risk for becoming addicted to religion (the so-called fanatics), and therefore may need some special handling. Unfortunately the church as a whole seems to be in denial about this problem.


Thanks for that, ClosetAspy. Religious fundamentalism/fanaticism runs in my family, and I've not known any church to discourage it.

Z



Jainaday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,099
Location: in the They

06 May 2008, 6:44 am

Having been raised in a large family of aspies, and being in the process of watching the (large) next generation come up, it makes me sad to see that so many would prefer to have children so restricted in a worship service.

It makes more sense to me to keep main group services shorter, so as to serve young attention spans, and then split up into smaller groups (some age sorted, some not) where younger participants can be more properly involved without impinging on the experiences of others.

I hate the thought of making the kids go to the back. It doesn't make any sense, from their perspective; church isn't likely to be very engaging for them to start with, and such an arrangement would likely exacerbate the situation.



I think it is also very important, though perhaps this is obvious, that the tone of the organization be such that questioning is accepted or even welcomed, and individuals are really cared about. When I was younger, I was repeatedly thrown out of scripture study classes for asking too many questions or having the wrong attitude.

I was confrontational, but my desire to understand was genuine and intense. In retrospect, my intense questioning was in part an attempt to understand other fairly terrible things that were happening or had happened in my life; due to the nature of my upbringing, church seemed essential as a part of understanding anything. If those in charge had had the understanding or gone to the trouble to consider the cause of my actions, it might have been actually useful rather than constantly alienating.

I should add that at the time I was a teenager, and would generally consider it the duty of ecclesiastical leaders to do a better job in this regard.



This looks very good to me.

PrJeff wrote:
I would say that I like things that take place in relatively small groups, where individual relationships are built over time. I like music where simple harmonies are built with simple songs such as those from Taize. I like cande light. I like worship that is group driven and participatory for each person in the group. I like silence to be mixed in. I like to touch things (like holding candles) or to eat food as a part of worship.

I dislike loud music or bombastic choirs (although I do like pipe organs if done right). I don't like altar calls, or "calling on people to pray" or other things that single people out. I intensely dislike things that are showy. I love worship spaces that are big like cathedrals, but dislike large worship groups like revivals.


_________________
And if I die before I learn to speak
will money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep


Manfrednissley
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: sw georgia, usa

24 May 2008, 7:10 pm

Betzalel wrote:
I prefer a sermon that is very theologically sound and logical and well thought out.
In fact a good sermon is really what I'm after as far as what I'm looking forward to in the service.

I also enjoy the old fashioned Hymns that have very sound doctrine in them as well as their own beauty. I prefer things to be spiritual but to also have deep meaning to them. I find most modern church services to be very superficial and seriously lacking in any depth. too much call to emotions and getting through the week, and not enough focus on actually getting to Know God better and really Improving my walk and relationship with him. not enough in depth study of the scriptures or any real explanation of essential doctrine.


Instead I usually get fed the latest load of crap from the likes of Rick Warren or some other big name that decides to write a book. very rarely do I ever get into a situation where I can fellowship with committed Christians and read the Bible without some stupid study guide and actually discuss the scriptures as the Spirit leads. this really bugs me.

So you asked a good question and I hope I've answered you. take all of the positives I'm looking for and remove or at least cut down on the negatives and I would find services much more enjoyable.


Jainaday wrote:
Having been raised in a large family of aspies, and being in the process of watching the (large) next generation come up, it makes me sad to see that so many would prefer to have children so restricted in a worship service.

It makes more sense to me to keep main group services shorter, so as to serve young attention spans, and then split up into smaller groups (some age sorted, some not) where younger participants can be more properly involved without impinging on the experiences of others.

I hate the thought of making the kids go to the back. It doesn't make any sense, from their perspective; church isn't likely to be very engaging for them to start with, and such an arrangement would likely exacerbate the situation.



I think it is also very important, though perhaps this is obvious, that the tone of the organization be such that questioning is accepted or even welcomed, and individuals are really cared about. When I was younger, I was repeatedly thrown out of scripture study classes for asking too many questions or having the wrong attitude.

I was confrontational, but my desire to understand was genuine and intense. In retrospect, my intense questioning was in part an attempt to understand other fairly terrible things that were happening or had happened in my life; due to the nature of my upbringing, church seemed essential as a part of understanding anything. If those in charge had had the understanding or gone to the trouble to consider the cause of my actions, it might have been actually useful rather than constantly alienating.

I should add that at the time I was a teenager, and would generally consider it the duty of ecclesiastical leaders to do a better job in this regard.


AMEN! y'all should look up the mennonites! i am one myself. the churches i attend have ~20 mibnutes for 3 songs and a devotional, then 35-45 for sunday school where groups are divided first by male/female and then by age. after that we have a period of sharing time where the offering is taken, comments on the sunday school lesson are voiced, 2 songs asked for by children are sung and then 3-6 songs are sung, sometimes the song leader asks for reguests, then prayer is done with prayer quests given by members as well as announcements. the preacher usually gives a sermon that is between 15-40 minutes long.
as you can tell the time can range quite drastically. but the order in which things are done is guite orderly
some of our basic beliefs are as follows
turn the other cheek, dont strike back after being hit the second time.
total pro life.
many menno denominatations including mine prescribe to the belief of the covering/veiling fr the ladies as prescribed by 1 cor 11.
we believe that christ is the risen Savior the Son of God.
any other questions? ill be happy to explain further.



Jainaday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,099
Location: in the They

25 May 2008, 7:39 pm

Hey, thanks for the offer. I've long admired Mennonites for the fact that they seem to create some really functional communities, which I think is really important. . . and also for the fact that they seem, as communities, to be far less hypocritical than some other Christian groups, in terms of really looking after the poor and commitment to nonviolence. Also, Michael Faraday practiced an Anababtist sect, and Michael Faraday is The Jam.

I have two big questions. First, I know that some branches of the faith reject certain forms of technology; could you tell me, what is the theological basis for this? (this is another thing I think works well- caution in acceptance of new technology seems wise to me. .. as much as I am a bit addicted to some of it. . )


Second, it's hard for me to even consider the Mennonite faith as a path for myself because it seems that to do so I'd have to reject the strong belief I hold that men and women are equal (though not identical) in value, ability, and leadership potential.

Having been raised in the Mormon faith, which advances the "different, but equal" idea (Utah was actually the first territory to give women the vote. . . and Mormons actually have a female diety they're never allowed to talk about. .. ) I understand how hard it can be to see sexism when one is on the inside of such a doctrine. . . unfortunately, when one stands back a bit, it's hard not to see.

For instance, the reference for veiling that you listed, from Corinthians, doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I first encountered it when I was a young teenager. .. the way I read it then was as a clear implication that women are as far below men as men below God. . (men should have short hair, less covering, as befits their station--because they are the glory of god; women should have long hair and a covering, as befits theirs, merely being the glory of men.) I was pretty pissed off. .. it made me want to cut my hair.

I'm not sure how it works with the Mennonites, exactly, but I know that in most other traditionally patriarichal forms of Christianity, there are a lot of more subtle institutional things that imply inferiority of women.

What is your take on this?


_________________
And if I die before I learn to speak
will money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep


Manfrednissley
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: sw georgia, usa

25 May 2008, 10:39 pm

Jainaday wrote:
Hey, thanks for the offer. I've long admired Mennonites for the fact that they seem to create some really functional communities, which I think is really important. . . and also for the fact that they seem, as communities, to be far less hypocritical than some other Christian groups, in terms of really looking after the poor and commitment to nonviolence. Also, Michael Faraday practiced an Anababtist sect, and Michael Faraday is The Jam.

I have two big questions. First, I know that some branches of the faith reject certain forms of technology; could you tell me, what is the theological basis for this? (this is another thing I think works well- caution in acceptance of new technology seems wise to me. .. as much as I am a bit addicted to some of it. . )


Second, it's hard for me to even consider the Mennonite faith as a path for myself because it seems that to do so I'd have to reject the strong belief I hold that men and women are equal (though not identical) in value, ability, and leadership potential.

Having been raised in the Mormon faith, which advances the "different, but equal" idea (Utah was actually the first territory to give women the vote. . . and Mormons actually have a female diety they're never allowed to talk about. .. ) I understand how hard it can be to see sexism when one is on the inside of such a doctrine. . . unfortunately, when one stands back a bit, it's hard not to see.

For instance, the reference for veiling that you listed, from Corinthians, doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I first encountered it when I was a young teenager. .. the way I read it then was as a clear implication that women are as far below men as men below God. . (men should have short hair, less covering, as befits their station--because they are the glory of god; women should have long hair and a covering, as befits theirs, merely being the glory of men.) I was pretty pissed off. .. it made me want to cut my hair.

I'm not sure how it works with the Mennonites, exactly, but I know that in most other traditionally patriarichal forms of Christianity, there are a lot of more subtle institutional things that imply inferiority of women.

What is your take on this?


well the amish reject most form of "modern technology." the beachy mennonite and strict conservative menno groups shun computers and tvs. the church that i belong to shuns the tv but has allowed the vidio in cd/dvd/ format as a learning tool. the church i attend with here in ga allws movies on movie players and also allow xboxs. as to the reason for this scripturally there are a few such not wasting time, ahem why am i on here anyway, and also avoiding the lust of flesh, ie the desire for sex etc.

actually i believe men and women are equal in that without one the family is in miserable shape. it takes 2 to become 1. We believe that you are married for life. even if one leaves the faith and their partner the one in the faith cannot remarry until the other dies or comes back to them, this is the case of my parents. as to the woman being in submissin. if the bible says to the women dont cut your hair and be in submission to your husband and you dont like that and you go and do the opposite, would that not be a sin? btw i have many stories which show the power of God on the ladies do to the covering. Also great protection over evil.

from what i can tell is that the bible commands husbands to love their wives and to dote on them! if they dont then they are sinning themselves. did you notice how the bible says that the woman is the housekeeper? this means she is also over the children, but it also says that men should not vex their children. same goes for their wives. actually i find that mostwomen would prefer most men to be leaders and be pansies and let their wives tell them what to do.

one other thing the woman was created for the man as a helpmeet. the man should not delegate that she should do every task in the house. it implies that she is to be queen of the household.

just my take



Jainaday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,099
Location: in the They

25 May 2008, 11:24 pm

Quote:
well the amish reject most form of "modern technology." the beachy mennonite and strict conservative menno groups shun computers and tvs. the church that i belong to shuns the tv but has allowed the vidio in cd/dvd/ format as a learning tool. the church i attend with here in ga allws movies on movie players and also allow xboxs. as to the reason for this scripturally there are a few such not wasting time, ahem why am i on here anyway, and also avoiding the lust of flesh, ie the desire for sex etc.


What are the guidelines for determining what is a waste of time and what is not?

To me, it seems that engaging in discourse--one possible use of the internet--is a good use of time. . . as is taking the time to explain your faith to to curious outsiders, which I most appreciate you doing now.


Could you help me out with this next?

Quote:
actually i believe men and women are equal in that without one the family is in miserable shape. it takes 2 to become 1.


without one--without either one?

Quote:
We believe that you are married for life. even if one leaves the faith and their partner the one in the faith cannot remarry until the other dies or comes back to them, this is the case of my parents.


interesting.


Quote:
as to the woman being in submissin. if the bible says to the women dont cut your hair and be in submission to your husband and you dont like that and you go and do the opposite, would that not be a sin?


If to act against the bible is a sin, then yes.
To be honest with you, I am not sure that this is the case. I try to behave in a moral way, but I let the ultimate dictator of that be my internal sense of truth. I suppose I figure that if god wants to influence my moral compass, he's free to do so at any time--by giving me the sense that the bible is true, or in any of a number of other ways. This is my personal belief.


Quote:
btw i have many stories which show the power of God on the ladies do to the covering. Also great protection over evil.


I would be interested in some of these if you were willing to share.

Quote:
from what i can tell is that the bible commands husbands to love their wives and to dote on them! if they dont then they are sinning themselves. did you notice how the bible says that the woman is the housekeeper? this means she is also over the children, but it also says that men should not vex their children. same goes for their wives.


I actually didn't notice the bible saying that, though to be fair the only part of the bible I'm really, really familiar with is the gospels.

I guess. . . just for myself. .
if I am to be loved and doted upon, but confined to a proscribed role and not ever trusted to any position of leadership except over children. . . I'm not saying that would necessarily be a terrible time for me, but. . . it doesn't seem like a partnership of equality. . . and a partnership of equality seems like a better thing, in my personal opinion.

Quote:
actually i find that mostwomen would prefer most men to be leaders and be pansies and let their wives tell them what to do.


?


Quote:
one other thing the woman was created for the man as a helpmeet. the man should not delegate that she should do every task in the house. it implies that she is to be queen of the household.


yes, well, there we go. . even a helper who is to be treated very well, if always a secondary other, will never be an equal.

that bothers me. I suppose, as it is your faith, it does not bother you.


Quote:
just my take


understood.. . and much appreciated.



I am also interested in anything other Christians might have to say about the secondary place proscribed for women, especially how they've come to terms with it if they've had trouble doing so. .

maybe I'll start another thread. .


_________________
And if I die before I learn to speak
will money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep


Manfrednissley
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: sw georgia, usa

26 May 2008, 8:50 am

my aunt says a waste of time is "not working when the sun is out".
i dont quite agree with that.

you are right i should have put "either one" there.

as to our moral compass. our compass is naturaaly turned wrong. the bible states that WE must WANT to have our "compass changed. God is not going to beat us over the head about it. until we die that is. too often our morality as aspies is way off line.

woah there i didnt tell you the whole story yet about a womans role. we believe that the older women have the obligation to teach the younger women. my mom has a problem of speaking to freely in sunday school when in with the men and God convicted her of it. she is trying but it is very hard for her to control her tongue. hmmm. for that matter its hard for all the ladies my family! and i have 5 aunts as well. :lol:

btw the idea that men and women are equal was given to us by the world. why are we as christians trying to accept the worlds principles?


Quote:
Quote:
actually i find that mostwomen would prefer most men to be leaders and be pansies and let their wives tell them what to do.


?


oops i meant to say not be a pansies :oops:

Quote:
I actually didn't notice the bible saying that, though to be fair the only part of the bible I'm really, really familiar with is the gospels.


ah thats the problem. we need to know the whole bible. after all the whole thing is inspired.



LeKiwi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,444
Location: The murky waters of my mind...

26 May 2008, 10:04 am

I'm not a practising member of any church or religion, though I've been to church services and buddhist events a fair amount. I just call myself spiritual, I believe in a 'higher being' (hate to use particular words)... should sum it up.

I enjoy small groups where you can have a real conversation with people about theology and actually discuss things in-depth and have debates without people getting upset or saying "Well this must true because the bible says it here!". I like it when you can question aspects of faith and of creation and of whatever else without people getting stupid about it or buring their heads in the sand. And where you can get to know and trust people and just revel in being close to that 'higher energy' and 'love' and whatever you want to call it.

I also enjoy quiet meditation of the Buddhist sort, quieting the mind as such. I find this incredibly calming as an Aspie as I'm always craving a moment or two where I can just let my gaze shift and my mind wander and lose focus and just sit and stare for a while, not thinking or moving, feeling time move outside me. Meditation takes this to a different level and it's a great feeling, often followed by interesting insights, so I do very much enjoy it!!


_________________
We are a fever, we are a fever, we ain't born typical...


dawndeleon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 695

26 May 2008, 5:03 pm

Pleased to meet you, pastor jeff. I think an open environment for worship is essential. Not to mention a few open minds. Keep kids in for worship, then pray for them and send them to their own classrooms with their own lessons. I would love to compare notes with you about being an aspie believer, not to mention your approach when it comes to ministry or pastoring. I am currently not in church, and have had difficulty finding one that my husband and I can handle. We are both aspies in question. My big thing is this..Is there a church that can be a haven to people on the outside? Can a person truly walk into your church off the street and feel welcome and like a human being? Please keep an environment of kindness and compassion. also, of respect and honesty.



Jainaday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,099
Location: in the They

27 May 2008, 5:52 am

If one's moral compass is naturally turned wrong, how does one know that anything, including the bible, or anyone claiming to be speaking for God, is right?

also, here's that other thread I started, if anyone's interested.

http://www.wrongplanet.net/modules.php? ... 22#1464322


_________________
And if I die before I learn to speak
will money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep


Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

27 May 2008, 4:47 pm

Welcome, Jeff! :)

I fancy myself a "spiritual atheist" and have been going to this nice little Unitarian Universalist church in downtown Fargo for a couple years now. The services are a wonderful mix of intellectually stimulating topics and beautiful music. The congregation is quite small and the people there are very tolerant and accepting of people that are "different" and thus it is a good place for an aspie.

I also practice meditation.


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life


Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

27 May 2008, 5:03 pm

LeKiwi wrote:
I enjoy small groups where you can have a real conversation with people about theology and actually discuss things in-depth and have debates without people getting upset or saying "Well this must true because the bible says it here!". I like it when you can question aspects of faith and of creation and of whatever else without people getting stupid about it or buring their heads in the sand. And where you can get to know and trust people and just revel in being close to that 'higher energy' and 'love' and whatever you want to call it.


This is why I like the UU church I go to, there are people of many different beliefs there and we have very interesting discussions. My belief that the notion of "God" devalues the wonder, beauty, and awe of the Cosmos actually came to me during after-service coffee & cookies while chatting with a neo-pagan member of the congregation a few months ago. :)


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life