should hate speech be taken seriously in all cases?
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Nexus wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
oh crap they didn't like that.....i guess someone who wrote or contributed to that article is butthurt. well that was fun for a couple minutes.
Meh, MysteryBot (I think it's functioning by now surely) would have auto-reverted the article from vandalism and logged your Username and IP Address for the Sysops to read. Hope you used a proxy lol, but relax, usually repeat offenders only attract their attention. It's usually one of the bigger reasons why people get ED articles get written about them.
lol what are they gonna do write an article about the stupid user name I put up......lol I just wanted to see if I could seriously delete it and it would stay deleted. Oh well.
Sweetleaf wrote:
Nexus wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
oh crap they didn't like that.....i guess someone who wrote or contributed to that article is butthurt. well that was fun for a couple minutes.
Meh, MysteryBot (I think it's functioning by now surely) would have auto-reverted the article from vandalism and logged your Username and IP Address for the Sysops to read. Hope you used a proxy lol, but relax, usually repeat offenders only attract their attention. It's usually one of the bigger reasons why people get ED articles get written about them.
lol what are they gonna do write an article about the stupid user name I put up......lol I just wanted to see if I could seriously delete it and it would stay deleted. Oh well.
If you were honestly expecting it to be permanently deleted... Yep, that's been attempted like hundreds of times before, if not more and it still stands and will always stand. In fact the more attempts would be a good gauge to show our effective an article is at offending the target(s). So ultimately if you're serious about that, the best strategy to one day see it disappear is to ignore it, don't even talk about it's existence.
TL;DR: It'll never be deleted.
_________________
"Have a nice apocalypse" - Southland Tales
Sweetleaf wrote:
Gedrene wrote:
aghogday wrote:
ValentineWiggin wrote:
DON'T CLICK THE BANNER READING "OFFENDED BY ASPERGERS" ON THAT PAGE.
PLEASE.
PLEASE.
Believe her, she's right you don't want to click on it. I couldn't help it , curiosity got me and wished now that I didn't. Noticed though they are making fun of Steve Jobs death. That pretty much sums up the value of the site, more than anything else in my opinion.
If anyone says the offended page is satire or anything of that kind then they are completely insane. Why? look at it. Only a person who was deceiving themselves could look at that with pride or indeed a lack of disgust.
Kinda agree with you there......that was just quite disgusting, glad I closed the page before I saw much of that disgustingness, someone really has no life and obvously has no clue that satire is supposed to be funny.
Sweetleaf. it is simply a clear case of people saying one thing and banking that uncertainty will somehow allow them to be protected. it is obvious that ED wallows in evil. If you let it stew you will harm other people, however. it is the ostrich principle. Hide, and hope things will go away. I assure you they wont.
Nexus wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Nexus wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
oh crap they didn't like that.....i guess someone who wrote or contributed to that article is butthurt. well that was fun for a couple minutes.
Meh, MysteryBot (I think it's functioning by now surely) would have auto-reverted the article from vandalism and logged your Username and IP Address for the Sysops to read. Hope you used a proxy lol, but relax, usually repeat offenders only attract their attention. It's usually one of the bigger reasons why people get ED articles get written about them.
lol what are they gonna do write an article about the stupid user name I put up......lol I just wanted to see if I could seriously delete it and it would stay deleted. Oh well.
If you were honestly expecting it to be permanently deleted... Yep, that's been attempted like hundreds of times before, if not more and it still stands and will always stand. In fact the more attempts would be a good gauge to show our effective an article is at offending the target(s). So ultimately if you're serious about that, the best strategy to one day see it disappear is to ignore it, don't even talk about it's existence.
TL;DR: It'll never be deleted.
Eternal vigilance is a small price to pay for punishing psychotics.
Last edited by Gedrene on 02 Nov 2011, 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
Nexus wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
Nexus wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
oh crap they didn't like that.....i guess someone who wrote or contributed to that article is butthurt. well that was fun for a couple minutes.
Meh, MysteryBot (I think it's functioning by now surely) would have auto-reverted the article from vandalism and logged your Username and IP Address for the Sysops to read. Hope you used a proxy lol, but relax, usually repeat offenders only attract their attention. It's usually one of the bigger reasons why people get ED articles get written about them.
lol what are they gonna do write an article about the stupid user name I put up......lol I just wanted to see if I could seriously delete it and it would stay deleted. Oh well.
If you were honestly expecting it to be permanently deleted... Yep, that's been attempted like hundreds of times before, if not more and it still stands and will always stand. In fact the more attempts would be a good gauge to show our effective an article is at offending the target(s). So ultimately if you're serious about that, the best strategy to one day see it disappear is to ignore it, don't even talk about it's existence.
TL;DR: It'll never be deleted.
lol honestly I figured it would not even let me delete it in the first place.....it was just something to do at 12:30 in morning. I could really care less if anyone wants to make an ass of themself by writing a stupid article. Not to mention that whole madness they wanted people to look at if they're offended...was not very offensive just had me wondering who in their right mind would want to look at those disgusting pictures long enough to post them on their article.
