autism supremacy is a need

Post Reply New Topic

Taking all the money from "them" as in the N.T's is vindictive, revenge and oppression. In Germany before WWII the ? Jewish were perceived as successful and removing progress, hope and success from the people of a certain genetic nationalism. This other then the Nazi's comparisons which to me is hog wash but I used it only because folks like you use it with their superiority ideas is just bad business, politics and public relations. I prefer to use the mentality "Together with". Job creation with the Neurotypicals to help people with autism be employed and part of the community. Together with our local community and nation made in America manufacturing in partnership with made in America manufactures of components and alike so.

A leadership philosophy may find short-term success and loyalty with a "them vs. us mentality". Yet a longer-term and more successful world-changing and system changing modality consists of partnerships with all walks of life. We together for instance compete with China but loyalty from the everyday consumer can be derived with made in america and as well as compassionate employment to help neutralize and or equalize better the imbalance. Your approach would sicken relations with potential allies in the pursuit for hope and change. Audacity comes in many forms. The kind that fails and that kind that succeeds even despite odds. Yet hope and change that is very well stable in philosophical and policy premise is not itself so very reliant on audacity alone.

Influencing the world while having autism is different from a specific philosophy which you implore. While I do not discount the possibility of leadership I will speak against leaderships that seek division and hard feelings as a way of philosophy. They are a danger to constructive resolve, resolution and real change. They replace real solutions with destructive hardships for all parties involved. Speaking of business and in context to this conversation the idea of fearing others into submission would only succeed in the short-term and in the moderate to longer future result in less positive change. When others are inspired to include and they are made part of that process it inspires them and they seek it. This instead of the strategy of persuasion that gets a few of them to do so whereas inclusion with positive and constructive change with them they tend to seek it and make it standard then that of the fight and plight of aggressive vindictiveness.

It is my best guess you are purposely and or subconsciously seeking failure to prove a point so as to empower a failed and rejected philosophy.

That is classified by the mother-ship. For all I know you could be a special interest trying to undermine progress and not a person with autism.

Please enjoy this selected video.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXrE_7YvRl4[/youtube]

It's a joke. The website theme is aliens. It's interesting how you think my ego is so big when ego is both natural and healthy. But you claim to be superior to the majority of the rest of the world for having a disorder label applied to you. It's a nonesense argument to claim in any indirect way somehow my ego is big enough to be considered quite larger then your own when your philosophy and awareness is well strictly about ego and your being superior. I suggest you study the nature of ego and understand what it is in the more natural and evolutionary ways. I wouldn't divide it so much between neurological types but strictly as human ego.

I can't believe this crap is still gong on... for 23 pages nonetheless!