What is your Body Mass Index?
amazon_television
Veteran
Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,608
Location: I woke up on 7th street
It's a joke for sure, but for me it's probably reasonably accurate. I'm like 5'8" or 5'9" and 185-ish, and 28-30 BMI seems appropriate.
I just made a guess on the survey based on people I've seen at psych clinics at work, so if I somehow jacked up the survey my bad ![]()
_________________
I know I made them a promise but those are just words, and words can get weird.
I think they made themselves perfectly clear.
I just made a guess on the survey based on people I've seen at psych clinics at work, so if I somehow jacked up the survey my bad
Yeah, it's accurate as a generality. It doesn't take into account having more muscle mass than average, or bigger bone structure (ie, most people have like 6 inch wrists, some actual bigger boned people have like 8" wrists.)
You gotta compare yourself to the "average" too. In America the "average" BMI is 28.3 for both men and women (strange, huh?) The average man is 5'9.5" and weighs 195 pounds. The average woman is 5'4 and weighs 165. So if you're under 28 BMI you are "skinny." I remember even at like 195, I probably had a bit more muscle, though BF was higher (20%, which is pretty average, too) and people would be like "What, you weigh 195?"
That said, I feel better and am more athletic at my current weight of like 174 pounds. Basically I lost a bunch of weight, went from 210 to 180, then to 195 when sorta "bulking" to gain more strength/muscle (Which was a dumb thing to do, but my ignorance of dietary practices and being on stupid weightlifter/bodybuilding diets did it) then I've been gradually cutting down from that. Now I do look more muscular than at my "old" 180 by far.
Last BF check was 17% at 189, so I'm assuming saying 12% at 174 isn't that unreasonable to claim. I've probably lost some lean mass, though. Not really sure.
I just upstaged you, and I dare anyone to beat my BMI: 56.8. Fat, gay, and AS - the perfect trifecta ... not.
P.S. wrists: 8.5"
Charles (somewhat of an expert on this issue, if I may be so forward)
If Body mass index is a pointless measurement, then how do I go about knowing that I'm making good (or not) progress in my fitness? I am just starting seriously back to working out after a broken arm. Basically I got a lot flabbier while healing, but didn't gain more than a couple pounds luckily. I thought I was going to use body mass index to show if I was doing all right, but what is a better way? Other than driving to the Cooper Fitness Institute that is.
I'd never broken a major bone before, and the whole experience was really bad. Now that the pain has gone away I'm really grateful to be able to get back to working out.
Charles (somewhat of an expert on this issue, if I may be so forward)
If Body mass index is a pointless measurement, then how do I go about knowing that I'm making good (or not) progress in my fitness? I am just starting seriously back to working out after a broken arm. Basically I got a lot flabbier while healing, but didn't gain more than a couple pounds luckily. I thought I was going to use body mass index to show if I was doing all right, but what is a better way? Other than driving to the Cooper Fitness Institute that is.
I'd never broken a major bone before, and the whole experience was really bad. Now that the pain has gone away I'm really grateful to be able to get back to working out.
Find some sort of way to measure bodyfat.
Actually yes it is true that BMI is not reliable when someone is muscular and athletic. An athlete who works out, lifts weights and has a BMI between 25 and 27 is healthy and they weigh more because of having more muscle mass. On the other hand a couch potato who has a BMI of 27 may or may not be so healthy and again they may have large build and maybe the person is still fairly young and fit even though they do not technically "work out" and maybe they are active at work, but not necessarily considered an athlete. Body fat % is a more reliable measurement when someone looks fit, but on paper it says they are overweight.
Men naturally have much less body fat % than women. Men should be no more than about 25% or so fat and women should not be more than 33% or so body fat. Long distant male runners have the lowest body fat% in general and I believe it is somewhere under 10%.
Swimmers usually have the most body fat% I believe and they can afford to have more since it may be helpful to be somewhat buoyant ![]()
_________________
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, but that we are powerful beyond measure."
Thanks.
I will not be concerned about the bmi anymore then. I think mine is in the neighborhood of 19.5 according to this page (link below) and my shape or waist to height ratio came to 0.4.
Instead I'll concentrate on building back my muscle strength and aerobic work such as fast walking and easy slow running.
BMI&waisttoheightratio
