Page 3 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,552
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA

17 Jun 2012, 10:53 pm

thewhitrbbit wrote:
I read a study that male homosexuality is more likely to be genetic than female homosexuality.

I think it's genetic though. I mean yeah there are stories like that, or the girl on America's Next Top Model who was sexually abused by a man and is now a lesbian because of it; but how do you explain children from loving families who received both male and female attention being gay?

Women dated or met lots of loser moronic guys who weren't sensitive like other women are


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


bettalove
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 118

18 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm

nick007 wrote:
Women dated or met lots of loser moronic guys who weren't sensitive like other women are


I have to disagree. I've been a lesbian my entire life. I've only dated women, and later only done sexual acts with women since the young age of twelve.

I tell people that my sexuality is like going to an art museum. I can admire the Rembrandt , Van Gogh, Warhol, and Pollock, but only want to take a Rembrandt print home with me.


_________________
Colorado Meetups http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/co_as_meetup/


DonQuoteme
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 41
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia

19 Jun 2012, 3:51 am

Bun wrote:
Pileo wrote:
From my basic understanding:

Attraction is surprisingly biological. Your bodies goal, no matter your personal goal is, is to have strong and healthy children. When searching for a mate, your body is looking for someone that compliments you genetically and immune system-ly (could not think of a word). Everyone has their own signature smells and pheromones that they produce to accomplish this. Males and females, of course, produce different pheromones and smells due their sex hormones. In homosexuals, their bodies like smells and pheromones from the same sex (for the most part). Just like everything else, there are exceptions to the rules. It is possible to make changes to the brain through the epigenome and nurture. How big the changes and which makes the changes, epigenome or nuture, is up for the debate. For all we know, the epigenome is the tool nurture uses to make changes.

Personally, I don't think the changes can be that big if it's just nurture and there's no traumatic event. People have tried to nurture homosexuals out of homosexuality for centuries. You'd think it work the other way too.

Mind you, this is "find a mate" attraction and not "what you're willing to have sexual relations with". The porn industry is proof enough that people will 'do' anything and anyone. :lol: Also, just because we don't have a genetic link now, doesn't mean we won't. There are thousands of genes to figure out and we only just begun. Not to mention it's much more important to find genes of genetic diseases than it is to find the "Gay Gene(s)".

You might call me an idiot inwardly while reading my question, but what about the sexual attractions of people who can't smell?...


I could be wrong, but I believe the pheromones may well act at a subconscious level, and would not necessarily require the "conscious" sense of smell to operate. This sounds counter-intuitive, of course, but it depends at what point the sense of smell is "interrupted". The brain may still recognise and respond to the chemical reaction caused by a pheromone, whilst the breakdown in the signal that allows us to consciously interpret the pheromone as a smell may be incidental. Remember, subconscious vs conscious control within our brain is somewhere in the ratio 95:5.



DonQuoteme
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 41
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia

19 Jun 2012, 4:12 am

AdamAutistic wrote:
i beleive in the gay gene. most of my family is gay.


To play devil's advocate, if a majority of your family is gay, it could be suggested that the gay-friendliness within your family made it more conducive for individuals to choose a gay lifestyle - making it nurture rather than nature.

However, I believe there's always a combination of nature and nurture happening.



DonQuoteme
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 41
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia

19 Jun 2012, 4:25 am

nick007 wrote:
I do not think sexuality is as black & white as genetic vs environmental. Saying genetic gives the impression that homosexuality could be inherited & I am not aware of any scientific evidence of a gay gene. Saying it's environmental gives the impression that being homosexual or straight is entirely based on how the person grows up. I believe numerous things can affect someones sexuality.


Research suggests birth order of a child correlates with male sexuality. The more male children born to a woman, the more her body produces hormones to feminise that male child in utero. This could be the genetic basis to male homosexuality. It makes a lot of sense, and I'm sure scientists will eventually discover that a similar thing occurs with female homosexuality. It's a byproduct of nature attempting to balance the numbers of males and females within the population.

So you'll be more likely to be gay if you are male and you have older brothers. And those with lots of older brothers will be more likely to be gay than those with just a few.



DonQuoteme
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 41
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia

19 Jun 2012, 4:40 am

goodiesguy wrote:
I believe you are not born gay, and it is a choice.


Nobody is born gay or straight; they may however be more pre-disposed to either extreme of the sexuality spectrum by their genetics. But by far the biggest determiner of sexuality, arguably is environment: their upbringing, peers, and social pressures/taboos. A few generations ago most men got married because homosexuality was socially unacceptable. Many of these men are only now coming out as gay after raising families. Young people are somewhat luckier these days because homosexuality is so much more acceptable.

So yes, to some extent it is a choice, but I don't think we can ignore the underlying genetic factors.



SanityTheorist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,105
Location: The Akuma Afterglow

19 Jun 2012, 10:02 am

I have had more recent thoughts about this actually; I think that what stillsearching is right about how you can know you're gay but not have words to describe the feeling.

When I was a young boy I always found being around guys more fun and cared little for women, while most guys were jokingly serenading girls.

Also, in middle school, I was asked out by a girl and to get her to stop bugging me I said yes, but there were no feelings attached and I didn't care about her; there was nothing in common.

I would describe myself as gay genetically but preferring platonic love. Cuddling seems great though.


_________________
My music at: http://www.youtube.com/user/SanityTheorist5/videos

Currently working on getting in a studio to record my solo album 40+ tracks written.

Chatroom nicks: MetalFluttershy/MetalTwilight/SanityTheorist


muzikislyf
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 19
Location: Oregon

25 Jun 2012, 6:39 pm

As a female, I was attracted to women, and women only, many years before I even knew what being gay was.



EXPECIALLY
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 701

19 Jul 2012, 11:20 am

bettalove wrote:
nick007 wrote:
Women dated or met lots of loser moronic guys who weren't sensitive like other women are


I have to disagree. I've been a lesbian my entire life. I've only dated women, and later only done sexual acts with women since the young age of twelve.

I tell people that my sexuality is like going to an art museum. I can admire the Rembrandt , Van Gogh, Warhol, and Pollock, but only want to take a Rembrandt print home with me.



i actually agree with both of you :>|

l am lot like you in this way though. If when you say "admire" you don't mean "attracted to". l have really never been physically attracted to a man but the admiration has been there, that is what caused me to enter hetero relationships TRULY believing that l could become attached to men because l liked them so much.

But l only feel the real and instantaneous attraction for women, and personality only plays a small role whereas for men it was the only thing that made them attractive to me, and l still didn't like kissing them.

@Nick l agree with you there too. l prefer to dismiss the simple explanation of homosexuality, especially in the case of females. *shrug* if l am betraying the community l really don't care, it is caused by bad relationships(not necessarily abusive) and overall bad experiences with men in adulthood for some women. Can l prove that? no, but it's easy to see through a facade and when many people can see the same thing that l do , l chose to acknowledge it's presence.

But, it is largely genetic for some of us. l just keep my out for women who l feel are authentic. And l would even date a bisexual woman, i'm not concerned that a women is also into men if she is also truly and SEXUALLY attracted to women ;)


_________________
AD/HD BAP.

HDTV...

Whatever.