Alternative wrote:
It annoys me, but at the same time interests me how artists make money out of sampling other people's work which in turn gets sampled by someone else ad-nauseum.
one argument for reducing copyright laws to increase creative commons is that the material looses value over time, but just as MGM studios can sell old vintage b&w films for millions, two chinese boys wearing yao ming jerseys can lipsing a backstreet boy song and command more viewers then MTV. so there is always value, and even if it is free, opensource, or in the creative commons, there is still a profit to be made on it. A random 80's track that only gets airplay in a smokey dive bar could be big money to the ears of dipset if they see potential in it.
_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.