Currently reading Her Fearful Symmetry by Audrey Niffenegger
And there are some parts I don't quite understand.
Julia is the older Poole twin. She's protective of her sister Valentina, whom she calls "Mouse". As the twins were preparing to go to London, Valentina sewed two identical violet dresses. She mentioned to her mother,Edie, that "Julia wanted me to make them in pink." Edie said that "We could have made hers pink."
After that Edie encourages Valentina to stand up for herself.
But going back to the chapter "The Mirror Twins" where they are introduced, it is mentioned that
When the Poole twins got to London and met their solicitor, they had this exchange:
"You don't have the proper visas, but we can certainly apply. What sort of work do you do?"
Valentina said, "We aren't sure yet. But we are planning to go back to school."
"Actually, we are done with school," said Julia.
Comparing against what is written about their university education, it seems that Julia is the one who usually drops out of school. Only now do we hear about Valentina asking about either going back to school or getting a job, neither of which the Poole twins were doing just before they heard about their Aunt Elspeth's death.
Now about the earlier generation of twins, Edie and Elspeth. The solicitor, Mr Roche, said that "Elspeth often kept her own counsel." The Poole twins' father, Jack, was apparently engaged to Elspeth, but Edie ran away with him to US. Looks like Elspeth was the quiet one, like Valentina, and Edie the one who does things, like Julia. At the moment I don't know who's older.
On a minor note, when the twins ask Edie about their Aunt Elspeth, and Edie shows them the passport record of their going to London to visit her, it is written that
The Poole twins are 20 at this point in the story, so those baby photos were probably taken about 19-20 years back. So the photos won't be "new" in the sense that they were just taken. Could the word "new" be used because the girls are seeing these photos as older youths?
Once they arrive at Heathrow, they handed over their "virginal passports". I interpret from here they got new passports for this trip. Julia told the woman at the counter they were staying "forever" because of they inherited a flat, although what the will says is that they must stay in the flat for 1 year before they can sell it (if they choose to sell the flat, that is).
I find their choice of suitcases interesting.
This reinforces the impression I have of Julia being pushy (bright colours + leering monkey face), and Valentina being quieter (cooler colours + regretful and shy mouse).
Would appreciate any replies to this. I generally don't like knowing the ending of a book before I finish it, so if anything I asked will be explained after the Poole twins meet Robert in the chapter "Valentina and Julia Underground", it's OK, I should eventually get to it.
I tried reading her book The Time Traveler's Wife after everyone in the world told me how amazingly wonderful it was. I found it to be so sickeningly awful that I gave up on it rather early and it became one of the few books I've ever dropped in the trash can. I could type up a huge description of what makes it so bad, but luckily an online critic tore the book to shreds in a more lucid and entertaining way than I ever could, and his review is linked below. Needless to say, I'm in no hurry to waste any of my time on her other writing.
Enjoy.
Enjoy.
I still have more than half the book to read. So far it's been an enjoyable ride, but will only pass judgement on the book if and when I finish the whole thing.
I like how you describe the review though - that's how I have felt in the past about some singers' work.
Isn't that funny - I loved The Time Traveller's Wife. I started reading after supper; every time I looked up was a hour later; I finished it at dawn. Couldn't put it down at all.
I blame myself for writing a positive review for About.com without taking into account the readers who will want the how of time travel. I heard from one reader who assumed the book would include scientific theory.
But I don't like romances, so that wasn't why I loved The Time Traveller's Wife. I am truly sorry you didn't have such a grand time with it as I did.
Please tell me - what was sickeningly awful?
I am one of those readers who would be interested in the whys and hows of the unusual things in science fiction. Extensive scientific theory not necessary though - my brain would explode (as a kid I know would say) if I had to read a complex scientific explanation.
It's all in the review I linked to. I didn't write it, but I agree with every word of it. The awfulness has nothing to do with the time travel not being explained. It's just bad, bad, bad writing.
Here's the link again:
http://www.noisetosignal.org/books/2007 ... eltigt.php
