Do women make lots of effort to attract men?

Page 9 of 12 [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jul 2013, 7:53 am

I give up debating with you, Schneekugel.

In a previous post, you middle-fingered the "Crazy beauty standards" industry, then in that last post you admit that you own such calendars that promote the same crazy beauty pornstar-like standards that you previously claimed you're so against.


I am totally failing to compute your logic. You're too illogical.


And oh, please, stop whining then how the media is pushing women toward anorexia, because the calenders you support are part of the media that push guys to take harmful supplements, steroids and fat burners stuff. There's an extreme scary DOUBLE STANDARDS in your brain.

And I don't think artistic paints equal real photos.


I wouldn't mind naked artistic paints in my house if I was married, in fact I have some, because nude paints are usually subjects of art, not sexuality, and bought for their art value, and they wouldn't arouse like real photographs.

But I would never put a calendar full of naked model women so I ogle on them every morning, that's a total disrespect to a monogamous marriage.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jul 2013, 8:21 am

MR_BOGAN wrote:
That's what it looked like to me. :lol:

This thread has just to much drama. I've really got better things I should be doing. :?


And too much hypocricy and lying.



Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

09 Jul 2013, 8:36 am

Quote:
I give up debating with you, Schneekugel.

In a previous post, you middle-fingered the "Crazy beauty standards" industry, then in that last post you admit that you own such calendars that promote the same crazy beauty pornstar-like standards that you previously claimed you're so against.


I am totally failing to compute your logic. You're too illogical.


I think I explained it now for three times: The guys on the calendar are models on a picutre. They dont look like that. Only their photograph looks like that. Simply as I dont look, as I look on my wedding photograph. There was no other woman doing my photographs for me. That was me. But the photos are simply cheated, because I simply dont look that way naturally. Just as the guys on the photographs dont look like that.

There is nothing wrong about that, as long as you accept that looking like on cheated photographs is nothing normal or natural.

But there are people, just as you seem to demand from yourself, that seem to demand and expect from average and normal people to look that way, that even professionals dont look like without technical help and cheating. And this is simply sick. And people that demand from me, that I look naturally and normally as specialists do, after lots of technical cheating, and photograph and shadowbodypainting - they get my middlefinger.

Yes there are pictures of nice looking boys. But what you seemed to be whining about, was you thinking that people expect YOU to look like that. First I dont think, that there are those many people expecting from you to look like a faked photograph. I think I told you that now similar times. Only because a girl like to look at a faked photograph and says "aaaaaaaw", she normally doesnt loose her brain function, and does expect you as a normal person to look like that.

You are always repeating: "Because girls saying aaaaaaw in front of hot photographs, I think I have to look that way." But these photographs are phantasies and normal people know that. My partner say "aaaaaw" as well in front of his half naked phantasy chicks, do you think he expects me because of this to look like an airbrushed painting from an artist? Do you think the guy at the front page of the calendar, looks in reality the way he looks like on that picture? ^^ If I met him, I´d guess I wouldn´t even recognize him.

But if there really is a girl around you that confronts you with that artificial beauty standard in reality, that expects you to look in natural, like a specialists look like on a cheated photo that needed hours of preparation and photoshopping. Then goddamn show her the middlefinger for being and dumbass.

I dont blame that models on photograph always have perfect legs. They have because of them getting body make up from a visagist before, because of an professional photograph working with shadows and because of an technician cheating with photoshop. But if someone would demand from me to have those perfect legs with 33 by pointing on some artificial photograph of an 45 year old celebrity - he gets my middlefinger for being an dumbass, not being able to understand the difference of beauty standard you have for an professional photo and in opposite reality.

And when a sick guy named Karl Lagerfeld demands from his models to look REALLY like that, because of them not being shown in pictures you can fake, but because of them doing public shows in front of customers. Then goddamn show that man your middlefinger as well.

Whats so bad about that? There is reality and there is phantasy. Everythings ok, as long as people separate them. The moment that people want to force on you a beauty standard, that goes for phantasy, its no longer ok. There is nothing bad about the NONREAL look Brad Pitt has in some of his films. Its fake. The bad thing from my oppinion is to see a private photograph of him with his kids on the beach and then demand of him to look like, like he looks in films. Then these people simply deserve a middlefinger and the information that REAL 45 year old guys simply have bellies, and if people cant live with that, they have to stay at home and avoid reality.

Quote:
And I don't think artistic paints equal real photos.
He watches real non artistic porn as well. Still he doesnt expect me to be horny all day only because of the artists in the films are. Because of him knowing that its simply a show, just as that photographs are a non real show.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jul 2013, 9:19 am

^ The body in the callender isn't attainable without supplements and stuff.
They would remove pimples, wrinkles and moles on photoshop but they wouldn't redraw his whole body. They might not look exactly like their photos but certainly not less than 80%.


It's like saying that those extremely skinny fashion models aren't really skinny like in their photos.

You are not admitting the influence of all that on the younger generations, you get only angry if someone expects you to be like a model in a photo, but you are not willing to admit that those male model photos have influence on girls' preferences (like female models' photos have their influence on boys).

You watch naked calendar guys, your husband watches porn - fine, that's your sex life, both of you are ok with that.

But most couples aren't like that, If a husband keeps putting calendars of naked models, the wife would most likely get that as a message that she doesn't look hot enough for him, it's a constant reminder that she doesn't look "perfect", and she's right to think like that, I can't see how else to see it.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

09 Jul 2013, 10:17 am

I smell butthurt, now to find out why.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

09 Jul 2013, 10:44 am

Schneekugel wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Schneekugel wrote:
So if you dont have crazy beauty standards, I dont get your problem. So you dont like that sixpack male beauty standard. I know that it is a problem as well, because naturally they are only to be seen propper when you reduce your bodyfat to a percentage number thats already healthy and on the other side you need to train muscles, that are normally not to be seen, because normally you simply dont need that muscles in an amount that they get that big, that you can see them.

I agree with that. You have an unhealthy beauty standard, and I have one. Gotta say what I told mine unhealthy beauty standard: Image

And now you simply do the same with your unhealthy beauty standard. If you dont like it, then tell it to f**k off. :)

(My english and grammar is bad, so should I have written something wrong in that post, neither the picture or any of the *pieps* were meant against you.)


If you are really that against crazy beauty standards then WHY you listed those celebs' bodies? why did you like Wolfheart/kazuki's body?

I believe you saw my body in the adult forum, this is the body I am happy with.


I think you care too much for bodies. Most of the celebs that are listed as most sexy ... are not famous for their body, and their average films are not based on showing them naked all the time. Some of them were even really old. Sure even the old Sean Connery, Harrison Ford, Pierce Brosnan or Denzel Washington are not obese, but simply normal healthy, but they have normal bodies (I think so, normally they were cloths as actors. ^^), still they are sex symbols. Beside the last one, that seems to be an US local VIP i have never heard of, I think Brad Pitt is the one that shows the most body in films. But as I mentioned, I know that these are films, with technicians, lighters, muscle painters, fitness and diet advisers three months before and so on. I dont think that normal people expect normal people to look like that. On my marriage photos I also looked perfect...after a professional visagist painted me for an hour, I have been at a hairstylist on the same day, a professional photograph with knowledge of light and shadows ... and photoshop ^^ did two weeks of work and so on. Why likes my husband too look at that photograph and ordered a portrait copy of it, he has know on his working desk? Because I really look great and beautiful on them, and if you see without purpose someone that good looking its nothing bad about it. I also called one of our construction site workers the "Cola light men" or wont argue if our "asian-combat-style" friend, that has a very similar belly to kazukis picutre, helps us with house renewing and goes around without T-Shirt in the garden. ^^

But I dont expect that from regular people, I dont demand that from anyone. If I come home and suddenly there is a dessert in my fridge, done from the world´s best dessert cook, woah, give it too me. :) But I dont expect or demand that from my partner and husband as example, because of me knowing that he is an regular men and no dessert specialist. I know that when he did a selfmade vanillapudding, that he needed lots of effort for him to create that, and I am thankful for him doing that much of effort, and dont think about "What could Gordon Ramsey (or however the guy is written) have created instead?".

And with you its the same. If you have a body that shows people that you eat healthy and do regular sports, normally people will appreciate that. Sure, an professional body actor does look better then you. But he does so because of him doing this for his job, not beside his job. I could look like a celebrity on my wedding day, because of this being a very special day in my life and I could afford to spare some money for that day to go to the hairstylist, naillady, cosmetics some day before, visagist... And people liked it and my partner really liked my look. But he definitly doesnt expect or demand me to look like that everyday, because he simply knows that normal people cant afford to look like that every day. Do I like it when celebrities look absolutly perfect on special occasation like during a film set? - As long as they dont overdo it, yes. Do I demand or expect from them to look in their normal life, as they look in films. Nope. Image ^^ For "normal modus" I think he looks perfectly fine.

I agree that there are some people, that are so lost to think of these extreme beauty standards as normality. But most people simply compare you with normal people, and if you are healthy and sporty, then you will be absolutly fine. Doesnt mean that if Heidi Klum suddenly appears in their beach bath, that they wouldnt think of her being absolutly hot and sobber after her, and may forget about the other girls for some minutes. But normally there will be no Heidi Klum around, only ordinary, regularly people, and these are the ones you are normally compared with. Yeah, a little sixpack to watch can be nice. ^^ But my partner and husband has none, he even was a little obese, when we started our relationship. The thing is, to look at a sixpack, a photograph is absolutely sufficient, so a sixpack at a partner is a nice bonus, but no necessity. ^^ But for the qualities you need for being a good partner, a photograph of that qualities is not sufficient. :)

And no, as extra mentioned, I did not want to show you the finger with the little boy, and tried extra to find a cute photo of it, so noone is offended. If whyever, there was something wrong in my grammatic, that let people think so, I am happy if someone shows me, where to correct it. :) So the finger was meant against beauty industry and people demanding sick beauty standards. :)


Question, do you see that while you fight against the female beauty standard you are enforcing the standard for men. A standard that is unattainable to 99% of men without ingesting absurd amounts of chemicals which are NOT healthy n any way shape or form. How is this better than trying to be skinny at all costs?



Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

09 Jul 2013, 10:55 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
^ The body in the callender isn't attainable without supplements and stuff.
They would remove pimples, wrinkles and moles on photoshop but they wouldn't redraw his whole body. They might not look exactly like their photos but certainly not less than 80%.


It's like saying that those extremely skinny fashion models aren't really skinny like in their photos.

You are not admitting the influence of all that on the younger generations, you get only angry if someone expects you to be like a model in a photo, but you are not willing to admit that those male model photos have influence on girls' preferences (like female models' photos have their influence on boys).



They are actually redrawing whole silhouettes nowadays. Its sadly on german, but on reportage of the television channel "Pro Sieben", you could see a professional photoshop artist doing his work. The skin gets matched in colours and tone, eyebrows get the length, thick, size, form and place you want it, eyes, lips, nose... the same, legs are stretched, boobs replaced and enlargended, and fat magically disappears... In the end the model got two sizes smaller then she was anyway in reality. With male models its quiet comparable. What looks like a hot unreachable sixpack is often a twopack with a fourpack of shadows.

When you speak of fashion models, you need to separate. Catalogue photos are often pretty photshopped, so there is not that much pressure for them. As example the girl of the german modelshow I spoke of, that was blamed by frensh designer to be to fat for catwalk, so they ended the contract with her,, has lots of jobs and customers and also is really skinny, around 38. Thats actually also what dessous-designer want, because dessous presentation really sucks without a boob to presentate a bra. ^^ Whyever, in Paris and Mailand, they still insist on size 34, which is american size 0 I think. 38 is reachable by a good diet and sport, when you concentrate on it. 34 cant be done in a natural or healthy way, even not by professionals that only concentrate on their job. Thats simply sick, just as those frogbodybuilders ruin their body to get that massive monster arms.

I dont say, that there are absolutly no boys or girls influenced by such things. But in the opposite I think its not that bad, when a guy demands from me to look like a professional picture of a super model. I mean at least you know very fast, that the guy lives in a non real phantasy world and doesnt fit for an relationship in the real world. And with woman its the same. I think a woman demanding of you to look like her dreamprince, wouldnt only demand her optical dreamprince from life, but her dreamlife as example as well. I simply think, that children that are still dreaming about their barbiephanties, are simply not fit for relationships, anyway if those photos exist or not.

Quote:
You watch naked calendar guys, your husband watches porn - fine, that's your sex life, both of you are ok with that.
Nope, we dont have sex lifes with that. When you visit europe and pass one of that hundreds naked ancient statues we have in cities, you dont have a sex life with them as well. They are simply there, and some of them are very pretty and give you some nice feelings, you can share afterwards with your partner, but you dont have sex with them. There is an ancient german sentence, that I think tells the way we handle it very well: "Its ok, to get some appetite outside. But eating (=sex life) is done at home."

Quote:
But most couples aren't like that, If a husband keeps putting calendars of naked models, the wife would most likely get that as a message that she doesn't look hot enough for him, it's a constant reminder that she doesn't look "perfect", and she's right to think like that, I can't see how else to see it.


Yes sure, she doesnt look perfect. I never knew, that partners expect themselves to be perfect phantasyprinces/ses, riding on pink, glitterspreading ponies. So where do I find that dimension portal to the phantasy world, where I find my perfect men I have to expect? Sadly until know I was in reality forced to meet only normal nonperfect men. I thought them to be "perfectly fine" ;) the way they are, but if those perfect supermens can be found somewhere in reality, I´ll take one. ^^

I dont know how to respond to that "hot enough", but from interests you could say I was a tomboy. So most of my hobbies and interests I share mostly with boys and during the engineer degrade school, there weren´t many girls as well. So my close friends were mostly boys and I spended lots of time with them. And from my experiences: Men simply like to see girls. (Just like woman like to look at boys.) Anyway if they have a girlfriend, or have no girlfriend at all, be it their nightelf-avatar chick or whatever. A men that likes to look at a woman, simply means nothing more then him being heterosexual. If he is additional staring like an dumb idiot too, that additional means, that he has no manners. So sure my partner likes my personality, because of it being MY personality. But my boobs, he simply likes, because of them being boobs. XD So I dont get, why you think its normal to be jealous at a photograph. If a woman decides, that she wants you as a partner, it is because of you. Not because of you having this or that. Every men has the same this and that as you have. There is nothing special about that. The only special thing about you, is you. And no photograph can have that. :) My partner and I also have sixpack...they are hidden under our normal belly fet, but they are there, so no cause to leave us for sixpacks. :)

Many woman also like flower bouquets or potpourries in their homes. Do you think, that because of women liking the sight of such things, that it is right to think of their husbands, that their wifes want them to to look more like flower bouquets or bowls with potpourri? O_o Its simply nice to look at such stuff, but because you like to look at something, doesnt mean you want it as a partner.

And I mean sure, my husband would like it if I was instant horny all day, like that girls in the films. Just as he would like it to have a spaceship, to fly to his work without traffic jams. Or to have superpowers, like Spiderman. Or to win a million in lottery. Sure, everything of that would be nice. But its simply phantasies and we both know that. Nothing bad about a little daydreaming, as long as you can separate it from phantasy. Its nothing real that can threat me or him in reality. Beside the fact, that the only thing I know, about a guy on a picture, is that he looks good on that picture. A partnership is something you do with a person, that you want to share your complete life with. So when I look at a professional photograph, I hardly know what the guy really looked like. But I definitely know, that he wont look like that with 50. ^^



glow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,484
Location: England

09 Jul 2013, 11:12 am

God its worse than Jeremy Kyle on here, and Parkinsons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson_(TV_series)

Quoting erotic dancers and films with Patrick Swayzee in them isn't going to make the woman in question love you more, its all about personality and contradiction in correct detail.



TGH
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Posts: 32

09 Jul 2013, 11:38 am

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
It happens the same for guys: When a young guy witnesses ladies like TGH and Schneekugel fancy and talk highly of an unnatural male physique while thinking it's the optimum of healthy body, the young guy might goes to the nasty stuff road to get such physique.

Yet the latter case isn't much discussed or covered in media, this is exactly what I was "whining" about.


Wow. Quote where I said that his picture is the optimum of a healthy body. I said that it is not unhealthy to go to the gym and have a healthy diet, and that getting some abs (note, no reference to that body type) might be easier than altering your body shape as some women do. Note I never said all women. I was responding to your post where you said that women don't need abs to be considered having a perfect body. As if women don't go through just as much struggle because they don't have abs.

Anyway, I should catch up.


_________________
So apparently I have "a very small trace of Aspergers?". Yeah, not sure what that means. But hey, any help I can give I will.

Glad to meet to you all! :)


The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jul 2013, 12:16 pm

glow wrote:
God its worse than Jeremy Kyle on here, and Parkinsons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson_(TV_series)

Quoting erotic dancers and films with Patrick Swayzee in them isn't going to make the woman in question love you more, its all about personality and contradiction in correct detail.


Who's quoting that?



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jul 2013, 12:18 pm

MXH wrote:

Question, do you see that while you fight against the female beauty standard you are enforcing the standard for men. A standard that is unattainable to 99% of men without ingesting absurd amounts of chemicals which are NOT healthy n any way shape or form. How is this better than trying to be skinny at all costs?


Good luck at that, MXH.



MXH
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

09 Jul 2013, 12:20 pm

The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
MXH wrote:

Question, do you see that while you fight against the female beauty standard you are enforcing the standard for men. A standard that is unattainable to 99% of men without ingesting absurd amounts of chemicals which are NOT healthy n any way shape or form. How is this better than trying to be skinny at all costs?


Good luck at that, MXH.


I know, I'm hoping that using very basic words will allow it to be easier to read



MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

09 Jul 2013, 12:23 pm

I personally couldn't bother with trying to achieve and then maintain a very fit body. Seeing one of my brothers, it's sure a lot of effort especially without steroids.

I don't envy what girls have to go through, however, to keep themselves as acceptably thin as possible.



The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.

09 Jul 2013, 12:25 pm

Quote:
Nope, we dont have sex lifes with that. When you visit europe and pass one of that hundreds naked ancient statues we have in cities, you dont have a sex life with them as well. They are simply there, and some of them are very pretty and give you some nice feelings, you can share afterwards with your partner, but you dont have sex with them. There is an ancient german sentence, that I think tells the way we handle it very well: "Its ok, to get some appetite outside. But eating (=sex life) is done at home."


Comparing artistic naked statues with porn and nude catalogue is ridiculous.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,550
Location: Aux Arcs

09 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm

I am not going to starve myself for some unrealistic goal,once I got down to 112.Only by not eating hardly anything.I'll keep my few extra pounds,I am too short to ever look like a model.
You can only do so much with your body type,all the dieting in the world will not give me a wasp waist or longer legs.I am not built that way.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


chlov
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 851
Location: My house

09 Jul 2013, 12:33 pm

I don't put effort into attracting people because I think it is not worth my energy and time.

I don't wear make-up, don't want to torture myself with those thight dresses other girls and women I know seem to love and I don't have enough time to spend on my hair. I am really slow when I have to get ready to go out, if I had to put make-up on, choose what to wear and spend time on my hair I'd be even slower.

I usually just put on whatever I see first, as long as it is comfortable it's ok, comb my hair a little and that's all. This takes me a lot of time because I am slow, slso I get distracted while doing things and I stop or start doing other things instead of getting ready.