The irrational standards women have toward men
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
Pretty much.
I work at Chili's and most of my male co-workers have wives/girlfriends. Ditto when I worked at Wal-Mart.
I have yet to see any evidence that women only date super rich, super attractive men. Amusingly enough, on my military forums, the men bemoan the fact that women these days only date "jobless losers." It seems modern men in general will never be satisfied with the amount of female attention they receive.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,186
Location: Adelaide, Australia
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
XFilesGeek wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
Pretty much.
I work at Chili's and most of my male co-workers have wives/girlfriends. Ditto when I worked at Wal-Mart.
I have yet to see any evidence that women only date super rich, super attractive men. Amusingly enough, on my military forums, the men bemoan the fact that women these days only date "jobless losers." It seems modern men in general will never be satisfied with the amount of female attention they receive.
I’ve tried Chili’s in Beirut before, twice, their food was disgusting.
XFilesGeek wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
Pretty much.
I work at Chili's and most of my male co-workers have wives/girlfriends. Ditto when I worked at Wal-Mart.
I have yet to see any evidence that women only date super rich, super attractive men. Amusingly enough, on my military forums, the men bemoan the fact that women these days only date "jobless losers." It seems modern men in general will never be satisfied with the amount of female attention they receive.
Your personal observations doesn't equal with reality. Being married doesn't equal with having a stable relationship. Most married couples will divorce and even if they still haven't divorced there's no sex or meetings involved. Most people I know who actually live in a married relationship doesn't have sex anymore nor they live in the same household.
Those jobless losers may look good enough to attract women, but most jobless losers don't have a girlfriend.
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,186
Location: Adelaide, Australia
palaua wrote:
Your personal observations doesn't equal with reality. Being married doesn't equal with having a stable relationship. Most married couples will divorce and even if they still haven't divorced there's no sex or meetings involved. Most people I know who actually live in a married relationship doesn't have sex anymore nor they live in the same household.
You dismiss personal observations as a source of evidence and then you use personal observations yourself. Quite the double standard.
_________________
The days are long, but the years are short
palaua wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
Pretty much.
I work at Chili's and most of my male co-workers have wives/girlfriends. Ditto when I worked at Wal-Mart.
I have yet to see any evidence that women only date super rich, super attractive men. Amusingly enough, on my military forums, the men bemoan the fact that women these days only date "jobless losers." It seems modern men in general will never be satisfied with the amount of female attention they receive.
Your personal observations doesn't equal with reality. Being married doesn't equal with having a stable relationship. Most married couples will divorce and even if they still haven't divorced there's no sex or meetings involved. Most people I know who actually live in a married relationship doesn't have sex anymore nor they live in the same household.
Those jobless losers may look good enough to attract women, but most jobless losers don't have a girlfriend.
Your personal observations don't equate with reality either.
I'm still waiting for something more substantial than your say-so.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
Pretty much.
I work at Chili's and most of my male co-workers have wives/girlfriends. Ditto when I worked at Wal-Mart.
I have yet to see any evidence that women only date super rich, super attractive men. Amusingly enough, on my military forums, the men bemoan the fact that women these days only date "jobless losers." It seems modern men in general will never be satisfied with the amount of female attention they receive.
I’ve tried Chili’s in Beirut before, twice, their food was disgusting.
It is.
It's a sh***y chain restaurant, and I don't get why anyone eats there.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
spaceone
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Joined: 15 Dec 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 68
Location: a rock in space
RetroGamer87 wrote:
palaua wrote:
On the other hand women have had multiple partners and lose virginity earlier than men on average.
If the average woman has had multiple partners that means there can't be very many men who haven't had a partner. If women are having relationships that means men are having relationships or else the women would have no one to have relationships with. There's no way every woman could have a boyfriend while none of them men have a girlfriend.
Nope. Cause it’s the same multiple men with each woman.
Example 100 women sleep with 20 guys each woman had multiple partners but 80 guys had no partners.
There are guys who’ve had hundreds of sexual partners. Usually good looking successful guys. They ruin your thoery. Those women aren’t all in a relationship at the same time and lots of women are a mistress to a married man or men in relationships who are cheating. Some of such men will have up to 10 side girls. Some men even have two wife’s and families who live in separate states and don’t know about each other obviously and when they find out, drama drama drama, and we only know about the ones who got caught.
kraftiekortie wrote:
Enough of this 20% crap!
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
This "theory" doesn't stand up when placed before people who have actually gone out and lived life.
Who in the "ef" is in the "top 20%," anyway? How can you determine that?
Just because a guy looks like a model doesn't mean he smells like one. Or he can have bad breath. Or he can just be a total as*hole.
You deny that certain men get lots of women?
What about actors? George clone,y had lots of women. Singers have whole groupies of women having sex with them. Rich men, famous men, players, bachelors etc. my sperm donor sleeps around with lots of women, my ex friend did too. I don’t think only 20% of guys get relationships and sex. But there is a small percentage of men that get most of it or a lot of it which explains why there’s women with multiple sex partyeven hundreds. But lots of men with few or none. It’s an avoidable fact. Celebrities partners and sexual exploits are on tv due to press. Closely had lots of women and non one every thought he’d settle down. Now if each guy only got to sleep with one woman and then was blacklisted by all women kind, then the theory that if a rascal women has 5 partners then all guys had to have had a partner could be true. But as long as there’s guys who’ve slept with hundreds of women around that means those women with multiple partners likely all slept with him which skews the data.
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.
sly279 wrote:
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.
There are women who do the same thing. Of course, they have to accept that other people will call them whores and sluts for doing what men get called studs for doing.
_________________
~MissChess
spaceone wrote:
The assumption that men will settle for dating most women is just absolutely incorrect. Just because you might feel like you would settle for dating most any woman doesn't mean that most every guy shares that opinion. I would prefer to not date at all over dating most women I meet. I like my personal space and time and there are very few people that I would sacrifice that for. A majority of my single friends, both male and female, share my point of view.
Most men will and do settle. Most men want the cheerleaders captain or prom queen. Make no mistake. Most will settle for average women. Better to have a nice attractive girl who you get almost with then be single ponding over the prom queen for rest of your life.
Most women take the latter and will hold out for Prince Charming(guy who meet their list of requirements) for a guy itd be ignoring chubby women they get along with cause they only want a thin gorgeous model woman. That’s exactly what a handsome, well paid, athletic guy is to women. It’s unobtainable for the majority of women. 73% of American men are fat. 66% of American women are fat. So majority of women who are fat themselves holding out for that 27% of thin men, and it’s probably roughly the same percentage for their idea income level men, is fools errand. 27% of women could end up with such men, but they all can’t , and most of those 27% will be with the 34% of thin women. Or they could date similar or less paid equally fat men and be happy.
Look people here hate I complain but I can’t change my situation. Be glad you don’t have to listen to women complain about being single cause they won’t date 70% of men. They could get a relationship if they just lowered their standards it’d be very easy for the, and I bet they’d be happy. I on the other hand would have to get a better job, lose lots of wieght, and get plastic surgery all so I can date a picky low paid fat woman. I have to have everything they don’t just to get their approval and be seen as datable.
For if I get the above my odds with the 34% of thin women won’t be any better. Fat women are still sexy, I just wish they did t have unrealistic ideas about men who are good enough to date them. FYI, it’s usually it thin attractive women complaining there’s no men to date.
MissChess wrote:
sly279 wrote:
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.
There are women who do the same thing. Of course, they have to accept that other people will call them whores and sluts for doing what men get called studs for doing.
There's many reasons for that, you cannot reasonably compare the two, it's not the same thing at all.
MissChess wrote:
sly279 wrote:
And there’s guys who see it as competition to sleep with as many women as they can, or sleep with every girl in their high school, or town. The whole notches on bed thing.
There are women who do the same thing. Of course, they have to accept that other people will call them whores and sluts for doing what men get called studs for doing.
In the past maybe. Two things have changed. Women sleeping around is more accepted, women empowerment. I dont know how sleeping with lots of strangers you don’t knwo is empowering, people are equally finding males who sleep around a lot digusting too.
OkCupid has that question and lots of people with men or women who slept with over 100 prople is deal breaker.
Most teenage girls sleep around a lot and talk about it much like guys of the past did. They talk about how much dick they go etc. since most do it they don’t seem to call each other sluts anything. Older women do I guess.
