Public Notice: Incel Trolls
Certainly. That's a way that might work for some guys that fail the interest detection homework.
I was asked on a date recently by a man. He didn't tell me his sexual history (or lack thereof) and he didn't spend months getting to know me first. Rather, he was honest and sincere, and he spent just enough time talking to know that we had a few things in common. Sure he was a little nervous but that's OK. It's cute. It didn't seem to be rocket science even though I know from others he hasn't dated in a very, very long time.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles
Guys just don't go around telling women their sexual history when they hang out with them. And it would be even less likely for a woman to tell a guy her sexual history. There's a high "creep" element to this.
Anyway....it really doesn't matter if somebody lacks dating or sexual experience. I have not asked a girl out on a date in many years. I have looked like an abject virgin even when I had years of sexual experience.
Right. The topic of sexual history is discussed only when two people are making decisions to sleep together, or when birth control / possible STI is being discussed. That's it. If one party feels the need to share more of their past / non-past that's their prerogative, but it's done in the privacy of a conversation between those two people alone. It doesn't need to be spread around the internet for others to hear, whether you've been very active or not active at all.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles
Fortunately, most people, including women, grow up in their 20s. The high school stuff is left behind, frequently, both for the bullies and the bullied.
I would say: start with a clean slate when you're in your 20s.
Women are PEOPLE....MAKE FRIENDS WITH THEM!!
From my experience no people don’t grow up.
I still get shunned and made fun by women and men.
Women don’t want to talk to me nonetheless be my friend. Only a few will be online friends with me.
Honestly it wouldn’t surprise me if in the future dating resumes become a thing thst you list all that Information on then send to the woman to review.
Last edited by sly279 on 02 Jan 2019, 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Incel Trolls™, on the other hand, deserve to be made to feel unwelcome.
So lonely men are only welcome if they keep their mouths shut and stay in the back corner so not to annoy you with their presence.
And you say there’s not bigotry against lonely men.
In my experience It’s asked in first few messages along with job, car, where you live how many relationships you’ve had.
Modern dating for younger people seems more like a job interview they want to know everything about you before they even consider going on a date with you non less consider sleeping with you.
There IS, however, bigotry against constant whining and complaining.
It's not the people, it's the behavior.
We guys don't need to accept that kind of thing. We don't even need to accept dating as a valid method to start a relationship. It always takes two to build a relationship. I strongly feel that it is the task of the woman to find out how the man is (and the reverse), so I don't feel that I need to give my CV like it was a job interview. When it comes to my work, my car, how many I had sex with and other social information, I feel it's none of her business as long as she doesn't know me, because those are not things a woman should care about before knowing me better.
Last edited by rdos on 02 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
As stated before, there are no new rules.
Perhaps XFG's original post did come across as a bit hostile, but bear in mind that tact isn't a strong point in the case of many of us on the spectrum.
"Tact" was never a strength of mine.
As for the rest of it, there's an ocean of difference between "lonely men" and "incels." For the purposes of moderating this forum, an "incel" is someone who advocates for the rape/enslavement/murder of women. If other people want to hold on to a different definition, fine, but as per "official" WP lingo in regards to moderating, we're using the term as I've defined above. Therefore, any claim that banning "incels" is the equivalent of banning all single men is moronic.
Secondly, I'm quite familiar with both Red Pill/MGTOW, and they both have misogynistic underpinnings that don't belong here. WP has never been dependent on misogyny or misandry for it's survival, and I'm happy to see those who hold such views f_ck-off right outta here.
_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."
-XFG (no longer a moderator)
As stated before, there are no new rules.
Perhaps XFG's original post did come across as a bit hostile, but bear in mind that tact isn't a strong point in the case of many of us on the spectrum.
"Tact" was never a strength of mine.
As for the rest of it, there's an ocean of difference between "lonely men" and "incels." For the purposes of moderating this forum, an "incel" is someone who advocates for the rape/enslavement/murder of women. If other people want to hold on to a different definition, fine, but as per "official" WP lingo in regards to moderating, we're using the term as I've defined above. Therefore, any claim that banning "incels" is the equivalent of banning all single men is moronic.
Secondly, I'm quite familiar with both Red Pill/MGTOW, and they both have misogynistic underpinnings that don't belong here. WP has never been dependent of misogyny or misandry for it's survival, and I'm happy to see those who hold such views f_ck-off right outta here.
_________________
I never give you my number, I only give you my situation.
Beatles
It isn't bigotry against lonely men, nice guys, or men who can't get dates -- it's prejudice against any posts in favor of violence, hatred, and/or contempt against women.
As stated before, there are no new rules.
Perhaps XFG's original post did come across as a bit hostile, but bear in mind that tact isn't a strong point in the case of many of us on the spectrum.
"Tact" was never a strength of mine.
As for the rest of it, there's an ocean of difference between "lonely men" and "incels." For the purposes of moderating this forum, an "incel" is someone who advocates for the rape/enslavement/murder of women. If other people want to hold on to a different definition, fine, but as per "official" WP lingo in regards to moderating, we're using the term as I've defined above. Therefore, any claim that banning "incels" is the equivalent of banning all single men is moronic.
Secondly, I'm quite familiar with both Red Pill/MGTOW, and they both have misogynistic underpinnings that don't belong here. WP has never been dependent of misogyny or misandry for it's survival, and I'm happy to see those who hold such views f_ck-off right outta here.
I would like to second the love expressed for this post:
