Spiderpig wrote:
It’s pretty simple. Males are biologically the expendable sex. In the ancestral environment, your tribe had no use for you if you couldn’t fight for it like every man was supposed to. Young children cry when someone hurts them to attract their parents’ attention so they protect them. Women are allowed to cry because their childbearing ability makes them inherently valuable to the tribe, so they’re protected, too. However, as a man, you’re supposed to be a protector yourself, not a liability. If you expect the tribe to spend resources protecting you instead, the tribe is better off getting rid of you. This means that, if someone hurts you, you’d better settle the conflict yourself, fighting to the death if necessary, so you won’t be caught alive without having destroyed the source of your grief.
That logic doesn't apply in the same way in this day and age, though, and trying to apply it in the same way to the modern age is, IMHO, an extremely flawed way of looking at it. Not to mention the double standard - if women can feel free to express their emotions openly, then why can't men?
Another thing I might add is that keeping your emotions bottled up can actually be more damaging than beneficial. Trust me, I'm speaking from personal experience on this one.
_________________
“They laugh at me because I'm different; I laugh at them because they're all the same.”
― Kurt Cobain