The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
16 Dec 2016, 8:56 am
16 Dec 2016, 6:05 pm
16 Dec 2016, 6:06 pm
16 Dec 2016, 10:02 pm
17 Dec 2016, 5:20 pm
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
They tend to be more picky
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
Have you tried? One can always make clear that you don't want to be their daddy.
Quote:
Older women won't be able to provide the type of young relationship I need
What, a 38 years old is not good for you?
Their kids will always till priority(rightly so) that isn't the relationship I want. I want it t just be the two of us having fun and cuddling etc. with kids they be there all the time and go on trips with them etc. I want the priority to be the couple and relationship.
I dont know if I ever want kids anymore.
How would a little long term relationship with eventually marriage work with you not being their parent? Impossible eventually you're have to take on a sub(can make decisions) parental role. It's unavoidable.
Probably to no. I want a youthful teenager like relationship. Just about fun, romance and getting to know each other. People in their 30-40s have already had all that as teenagers and want a serious settledown, plan for retirement relationship. I see them on dating sites and Craigslist . They all have really great jobs own a house or two and multiple cars.
About the kids wilburforce here above is right.
About people in their 30-40s already having had that kind of relationship, you are wrong. Actually people in their teens already had that kind of relationship, and and that's why you called it a "youthful teenager like relationship".
Perhaps they see that you want that kind of relationship and they don't want it, as they are not teens anymore and they've been there already. If I can give an advice stop thinking about teenlike relationships, as you are not a teen anymore as well. That time is gone.
Also why do you complain about women having dealbreakers if you have them too?
Most the women in my area seem to have kids, I even see 18 old women who have 2-3 kids. That means they had to start having them by 16ish.
Well sorry as I never had that it's what I want. It's the type of love I'm able to offer. I never had it as a teen to then mature to maturation love. I'm playful and silly. It's who I am. I'm not ambitious or serious all the time.
Mine are not about how much money someone makes or where they live, it's about who they are and their personality. You know what makes you you. A job and money don't define people. Your not a mailman that's your job. His hobbies and interests are who he is, delivering mail is just how he makes money to eat. Seems a lot of women are more interested in dating job titles then the man who has the title,that's wrong. And it's not their fault western society defines people by their job, not who they are. It should be the other way around.
Wish I'd been born in the 1900-1920s
But thanks for you on par as usual depressing posts to me
In the 1900-1920 jobs were even more important when choosing a partner. That's if you were not sent of to war.
I get what you mean though why should you have to date cougars or people with kids? You have your own preferences and are allowed to stick to them.
People have kids at 18 in your area
There were a lot a lot more factory type jobs back then which is probably the only good paying job I could do. And if not I could have died for my country which is a lot better then the pointless existence I live now. I'm not even good enough to die for my country according to the government.
Yes lots of 18 olds around here have a kid or multiple kids. There's 16 olds with kids.
So by 20s it seems like the majority of women have kids. By 30s their teenagers
I definitely don't want to suddenly have teenagers.
They married their high school jock sweethearts and then 2-10 years later he leaves them seems to be the standard story
17 Dec 2016, 5:21 pm
17 Dec 2016, 6:17 pm
17 Dec 2016, 6:49 pm
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
They tend to be more picky
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
Have you tried? One can always make clear that you don't want to be their daddy.
Quote:
Older women won't be able to provide the type of young relationship I need
What, a 38 years old is not good for you?
Their kids will always till priority(rightly so) that isn't the relationship I want. I want it t just be the two of us having fun and cuddling etc. with kids they be there all the time and go on trips with them etc. I want the priority to be the couple and relationship.
I dont know if I ever want kids anymore.
How would a little long term relationship with eventually marriage work with you not being their parent? Impossible eventually you're have to take on a sub(can make decisions) parental role. It's unavoidable.
Probably to no. I want a youthful teenager like relationship. Just about fun, romance and getting to know each other. People in their 30-40s have already had all that as teenagers and want a serious settledown, plan for retirement relationship. I see them on dating sites and Craigslist . They all have really great jobs own a house or two and multiple cars.
About the kids wilburforce here above is right.
About people in their 30-40s already having had that kind of relationship, you are wrong. Actually people in their teens already had that kind of relationship, and and that's why you called it a "youthful teenager like relationship".
Perhaps they see that you want that kind of relationship and they don't want it, as they are not teens anymore and they've been there already. If I can give an advice stop thinking about teenlike relationships, as you are not a teen anymore as well. That time is gone.
Also why do you complain about women having dealbreakers if you have them too?
Most the women in my area seem to have kids, I even see 18 old women who have 2-3 kids. That means they had to start having them by 16ish.
Well sorry as I never had that it's what I want. It's the type of love I'm able to offer. I never had it as a teen to then mature to maturation love. I'm playful and silly. It's who I am. I'm not ambitious or serious all the time.
Mine are not about how much money someone makes or where they live, it's about who they are and their personality. You know what makes you you. A job and money don't define people. Your not a mailman that's your job. His hobbies and interests are who he is, delivering mail is just how he makes money to eat. Seems a lot of women are more interested in dating job titles then the man who has the title,that's wrong. And it's not their fault western society defines people by their job, not who they are. It should be the other way around.
Wish I'd been born in the 1900-1920s
But thanks for you on par as usual depressing posts to me
In the 1900-1920 jobs were even more important when choosing a partner. That's if you were not sent of to war.
I get what you mean though why should you have to date cougars or people with kids? You have your own preferences and are allowed to stick to them.
People have kids at 18 in your area
To be fair, I would have been perfectly fine with being on of the first Australian ANZAC young soldiers to die on the beaches of Gallipoli by Turkish gunfire (some drowned, I'd have hoped I'd at least make it to the beach) if it meant I had a girlfriend back home I was dating since 16 and I had a decent life.
Life was simpler back then due to lack of technology anyway.
17 Dec 2016, 8:18 pm
Outrider wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
They tend to be more picky
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
Have you tried? One can always make clear that you don't want to be their daddy.
Quote:
Older women won't be able to provide the type of young relationship I need
What, a 38 years old is not good for you?
Their kids will always till priority(rightly so) that isn't the relationship I want. I want it t just be the two of us having fun and cuddling etc. with kids they be there all the time and go on trips with them etc. I want the priority to be the couple and relationship.
I dont know if I ever want kids anymore.
How would a little long term relationship with eventually marriage work with you not being their parent? Impossible eventually you're have to take on a sub(can make decisions) parental role. It's unavoidable.
Probably to no. I want a youthful teenager like relationship. Just about fun, romance and getting to know each other. People in their 30-40s have already had all that as teenagers and want a serious settledown, plan for retirement relationship. I see them on dating sites and Craigslist . They all have really great jobs own a house or two and multiple cars.
About the kids wilburforce here above is right.
About people in their 30-40s already having had that kind of relationship, you are wrong. Actually people in their teens already had that kind of relationship, and and that's why you called it a "youthful teenager like relationship".
Perhaps they see that you want that kind of relationship and they don't want it, as they are not teens anymore and they've been there already. If I can give an advice stop thinking about teenlike relationships, as you are not a teen anymore as well. That time is gone.
Also why do you complain about women having dealbreakers if you have them too?
Most the women in my area seem to have kids, I even see 18 old women who have 2-3 kids. That means they had to start having them by 16ish.
Well sorry as I never had that it's what I want. It's the type of love I'm able to offer. I never had it as a teen to then mature to maturation love. I'm playful and silly. It's who I am. I'm not ambitious or serious all the time.
Mine are not about how much money someone makes or where they live, it's about who they are and their personality. You know what makes you you. A job and money don't define people. Your not a mailman that's your job. His hobbies and interests are who he is, delivering mail is just how he makes money to eat. Seems a lot of women are more interested in dating job titles then the man who has the title,that's wrong. And it's not their fault western society defines people by their job, not who they are. It should be the other way around.
Wish I'd been born in the 1900-1920s
But thanks for you on par as usual depressing posts to me
In the 1900-1920 jobs were even more important when choosing a partner. That's if you were not sent of to war.
I get what you mean though why should you have to date cougars or people with kids? You have your own preferences and are allowed to stick to them.
People have kids at 18 in your area
To be fair, I would have been perfectly fine with being on of the first Australian ANZAC young soldiers to die on the beaches of Gallipoli by Turkish gunfire (some drowned, I'd have hoped I'd at least make it to the beach) if it meant I had a girlfriend back home I was dating since 16 and I had a decent life.
Life was simpler back then due to lack of technology anyway.
18 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
sly279 wrote:
Outrider wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
They tend to be more picky
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
Have you tried? One can always make clear that you don't want to be their daddy.
Quote:
Older women won't be able to provide the type of young relationship I need
What, a 38 years old is not good for you?
Their kids will always till priority(rightly so) that isn't the relationship I want. I want it t just be the two of us having fun and cuddling etc. with kids they be there all the time and go on trips with them etc. I want the priority to be the couple and relationship.
I dont know if I ever want kids anymore.
How would a little long term relationship with eventually marriage work with you not being their parent? Impossible eventually you're have to take on a sub(can make decisions) parental role. It's unavoidable.
Probably to no. I want a youthful teenager like relationship. Just about fun, romance and getting to know each other. People in their 30-40s have already had all that as teenagers and want a serious settledown, plan for retirement relationship. I see them on dating sites and Craigslist . They all have really great jobs own a house or two and multiple cars.
About the kids wilburforce here above is right.
About people in their 30-40s already having had that kind of relationship, you are wrong. Actually people in their teens already had that kind of relationship, and and that's why you called it a "youthful teenager like relationship".
Perhaps they see that you want that kind of relationship and they don't want it, as they are not teens anymore and they've been there already. If I can give an advice stop thinking about teenlike relationships, as you are not a teen anymore as well. That time is gone.
Also why do you complain about women having dealbreakers if you have them too?
Most the women in my area seem to have kids, I even see 18 old women who have 2-3 kids. That means they had to start having them by 16ish.
Well sorry as I never had that it's what I want. It's the type of love I'm able to offer. I never had it as a teen to then mature to maturation love. I'm playful and silly. It's who I am. I'm not ambitious or serious all the time.
Mine are not about how much money someone makes or where they live, it's about who they are and their personality. You know what makes you you. A job and money don't define people. Your not a mailman that's your job. His hobbies and interests are who he is, delivering mail is just how he makes money to eat. Seems a lot of women are more interested in dating job titles then the man who has the title,that's wrong. And it's not their fault western society defines people by their job, not who they are. It should be the other way around.
Wish I'd been born in the 1900-1920s
But thanks for you on par as usual depressing posts to me
In the 1900-1920 jobs were even more important when choosing a partner. That's if you were not sent of to war.
I get what you mean though why should you have to date cougars or people with kids? You have your own preferences and are allowed to stick to them.
People have kids at 18 in your area
To be fair, I would have been perfectly fine with being on of the first Australian ANZAC young soldiers to die on the beaches of Gallipoli by Turkish gunfire (some drowned, I'd have hoped I'd at least make it to the beach) if it meant I had a girlfriend back home I was dating since 16 and I had a decent life.
Life was simpler back then due to lack of technology anyway.
And women did not have the right to vote
18 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
18 Dec 2016, 1:41 pm
18 Dec 2016, 3:28 pm
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Outrider wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
They tend to be more picky
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
Have you tried? One can always make clear that you don't want to be their daddy.
Quote:
Older women won't be able to provide the type of young relationship I need
What, a 38 years old is not good for you?
Their kids will always till priority(rightly so) that isn't the relationship I want. I want it t just be the two of us having fun and cuddling etc. with kids they be there all the time and go on trips with them etc. I want the priority to be the couple and relationship.
I dont know if I ever want kids anymore.
How would a little long term relationship with eventually marriage work with you not being their parent? Impossible eventually you're have to take on a sub(can make decisions) parental role. It's unavoidable.
Probably to no. I want a youthful teenager like relationship. Just about fun, romance and getting to know each other. People in their 30-40s have already had all that as teenagers and want a serious settledown, plan for retirement relationship. I see them on dating sites and Craigslist . They all have really great jobs own a house or two and multiple cars.
About the kids wilburforce here above is right.
About people in their 30-40s already having had that kind of relationship, you are wrong. Actually people in their teens already had that kind of relationship, and and that's why you called it a "youthful teenager like relationship".
Perhaps they see that you want that kind of relationship and they don't want it, as they are not teens anymore and they've been there already. If I can give an advice stop thinking about teenlike relationships, as you are not a teen anymore as well. That time is gone.
Also why do you complain about women having dealbreakers if you have them too?
Most the women in my area seem to have kids, I even see 18 old women who have 2-3 kids. That means they had to start having them by 16ish.
Well sorry as I never had that it's what I want. It's the type of love I'm able to offer. I never had it as a teen to then mature to maturation love. I'm playful and silly. It's who I am. I'm not ambitious or serious all the time.
Mine are not about how much money someone makes or where they live, it's about who they are and their personality. You know what makes you you. A job and money don't define people. Your not a mailman that's your job. His hobbies and interests are who he is, delivering mail is just how he makes money to eat. Seems a lot of women are more interested in dating job titles then the man who has the title,that's wrong. And it's not their fault western society defines people by their job, not who they are. It should be the other way around.
Wish I'd been born in the 1900-1920s
But thanks for you on par as usual depressing posts to me
In the 1900-1920 jobs were even more important when choosing a partner. That's if you were not sent of to war.
I get what you mean though why should you have to date cougars or people with kids? You have your own preferences and are allowed to stick to them.
People have kids at 18 in your area
To be fair, I would have been perfectly fine with being on of the first Australian ANZAC young soldiers to die on the beaches of Gallipoli by Turkish gunfire (some drowned, I'd have hoped I'd at least make it to the beach) if it meant I had a girlfriend back home I was dating since 16 and I had a decent life.
Life was simpler back then due to lack of technology anyway.
And women did not have the right to vote
Woman got the right to vote august 18th 1920
Could women not yet vote in Europe?
18 Dec 2016, 5:16 pm
sly279 wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Outrider wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
sly279 wrote:
They tend to be more picky
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
, divorced and have multiple kids who are in their teens ,so no.
Have you tried? One can always make clear that you don't want to be their daddy.
Quote:
Older women won't be able to provide the type of young relationship I need
What, a 38 years old is not good for you?
Their kids will always till priority(rightly so) that isn't the relationship I want. I want it t just be the two of us having fun and cuddling etc. with kids they be there all the time and go on trips with them etc. I want the priority to be the couple and relationship.
I dont know if I ever want kids anymore.
How would a little long term relationship with eventually marriage work with you not being their parent? Impossible eventually you're have to take on a sub(can make decisions) parental role. It's unavoidable.
Probably to no. I want a youthful teenager like relationship. Just about fun, romance and getting to know each other. People in their 30-40s have already had all that as teenagers and want a serious settledown, plan for retirement relationship. I see them on dating sites and Craigslist . They all have really great jobs own a house or two and multiple cars.
About the kids wilburforce here above is right.
About people in their 30-40s already having had that kind of relationship, you are wrong. Actually people in their teens already had that kind of relationship, and and that's why you called it a "youthful teenager like relationship".
Perhaps they see that you want that kind of relationship and they don't want it, as they are not teens anymore and they've been there already. If I can give an advice stop thinking about teenlike relationships, as you are not a teen anymore as well. That time is gone.
Also why do you complain about women having dealbreakers if you have them too?
Most the women in my area seem to have kids, I even see 18 old women who have 2-3 kids. That means they had to start having them by 16ish.
Well sorry as I never had that it's what I want. It's the type of love I'm able to offer. I never had it as a teen to then mature to maturation love. I'm playful and silly. It's who I am. I'm not ambitious or serious all the time.
Mine are not about how much money someone makes or where they live, it's about who they are and their personality. You know what makes you you. A job and money don't define people. Your not a mailman that's your job. His hobbies and interests are who he is, delivering mail is just how he makes money to eat. Seems a lot of women are more interested in dating job titles then the man who has the title,that's wrong. And it's not their fault western society defines people by their job, not who they are. It should be the other way around.
Wish I'd been born in the 1900-1920s
But thanks for you on par as usual depressing posts to me
In the 1900-1920 jobs were even more important when choosing a partner. That's if you were not sent of to war.
I get what you mean though why should you have to date cougars or people with kids? You have your own preferences and are allowed to stick to them.
People have kids at 18 in your area
To be fair, I would have been perfectly fine with being on of the first Australian ANZAC young soldiers to die on the beaches of Gallipoli by Turkish gunfire (some drowned, I'd have hoped I'd at least make it to the beach) if it meant I had a girlfriend back home I was dating since 16 and I had a decent life.
Life was simpler back then due to lack of technology anyway.
And women did not have the right to vote
Woman got the right to vote august 18th 1920
Could women not yet vote in Europe?
You said 1900 to 1920 which is mostly before that.
18 Dec 2016, 6:30 pm
Peacesells wrote:
I see that we have quite a few Call of Duty players here.
And LOL at the "millions of guy died, so there will be many single women!".
And LOL at the "millions of guy died, so there will be many single women!".
Nope, i hate war games.
Of course I know war is hell.
But there's a lot of evidence showing world war 1, the Australian soldiers at least were ignorant of what they were getting into.
All the propaganda made them think it would be fun adventures around the world to fight nobly for their country.
If you read old war letters soldiers of other countries fought the same.
Even by world war 2, you would have only known how bad war is if you were in ww1 yourself or had a family member die/injured from it - the government covered things up.
18 Dec 2016, 6:53 pm
Outrider wrote:
Peacesells wrote:
I see that we have quite a few Call of Duty players here.
And LOL at the "millions of guy died, so there will be many single women!".
And LOL at the "millions of guy died, so there will be many single women!".
Nope, i hate war games.
Of course I know war is hell.
But there's a lot of evidence showing world war 1, the Australian soldiers at least were ignorant of what they were getting into.
All the propaganda made them think it would be fun adventures around the world to fight nobly for their country.
If you read old war letters soldiers of other countries fought the same.
Even by world war 2, you would have only known how bad war is if you were in ww1 yourself or had a family member die/injured from it - the government covered things up.
In england we are taught abot all the atrocities that occurred from quite early on. All about trenchfoot, rotting flesh, infections, people with ptsd, people shooting themselves to be sent home, experiments performed on prisoners, fields of dead people. War is horrendous and should never be glorified imo. I respect soldiers as it can be a necessity but I thing people forget how bad it can be.
