When do you say "I love you"?

Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

27 Feb 2017, 11:01 am

AngelRho wrote:
I don't believe we have any fundamental disagreement here, I just think we're operating under completely separate definitions and assumptions. Of course attachments are healthy within certain contexts. The problem with emotions is that they are fickle, so decisions based purely on emotion are shaky. The handsome guy with a charismatic personality and flawlessly chivalric manners is a narcissistic abuser whose previous wife died suddenly in a "freak accident descending the stairs." Emotions say go for it, ignore the haters and naysayers. Reason says the guy is a creep.


Reason only works there before you get involved.

The way to get out of abusive relationships is not to decide to leave, but build up the emotion of hate against the abuser. It's the same thing as with one-sided love. You cannot decide to give up on a crush, but you can build up hate against him/her, and it will "kill" the crush. Additional evidence for this is all the women that go back to their abusive men even if they decided to call it quits when the man appeals to their emotions. If they start to hate him instead, that is unlikely to happen.

AngelRho wrote:
The decision to love someone is separate from the emotions that influence it. Love for someone (emotional) is evidenced by what a person actually does in response, which is entirely a decision. Doing laundry, dishes, putting kids to bed, and all sorts of shared responsibility performed consistently along with surprises which are not are all evidence that someone desires someone enough to incentivize staying together.


I'd rather say that the positive emotions such things cause are what build attachment, and it is attachment that keeps people together.

AngelRho wrote:
Even if the other person claims unconditional love, there is still the desire to do SOMETHING even in the absence of need. One may decide to translate love into action or not. However, love without action is meaningless. It reduces women to housekeepers and rags for male gratification, and men to sources of money and sperm. Anything beyond that rests on the decisions of couples to make the relationship richer and more meaningful, or more substantial at least than mere reproductive servants.


My opinion is more that attachment will automatically cause some types of actions. Like how parents automatically care for their children. They do this because of the emotional bond, not because society or somebody else says they have to. A relationship built on attachment is the same. A relationship only built on a decision, and not on emotions, will be more like a business relationship, with requirements for reciprocal actions, or it will end.



ThisAdamGuy
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 May 2015
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 692
Location: Northwest Arkansas

27 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm

I mean, I kind of sympathize with her. Both her adopted parents just went to jail for felonies, and she's just moved in with her real dad for the first time in her life. So yeah, things are pretty crazy for her right now. I don't hold that against her. I just wish she hadn't waited until after we had a relationship to decide she couldn't handle a relationship.


_________________
Autistic author of fantasy novels. Read them for free HERE!


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 35,278
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

27 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm

AngelRho wrote:
ThisAdamGuy wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
That was... quick. Was she the same oversilent girl?


No, it was someone different. This girl actually made first contact with me, if you can believe it (I have a hard time believing it myself). She was a lot more open and friendly than my last gf. And then yesterday, right out of the blue, I get a text from her saying she's "going to be that person" and we need to break up. She says it's nothing about me, her life is just too crazy and it's "[her] fault for ever thinking [she] could be in a relationship." So yeah, that's that I guess.

Lunella wrote:
Feel better soon.


I'm honestly not that broken up about it. I was a little depressed yesterday, but I'm over it now. I don't think I'm going to try this again, though. I'm better off by myself.

It's worth trying again, though. That's why I insist on not being attached to any one person, at least not right away. You seem to be handling it well. Give it another 3 weeks or so and get back in the saddle. You'll be fine.

Not that this is really helpful, and you probably think I'm just stating the obvious, but your girl is a liar. Maybe things are crazy for her, but the thing about relationships is you can weather anything IAR if it really means something to you. She didn't dump you because her life is crazy. She dumped you because she's not into you.

I hate when people do that, because I instinctively go into fix-it mode. What do you mean your life is crazy? Here, let me help. Talk to me about it and let's see what we can do together. Doesn't mean we have to break up. Except it DOES, because she wants it that way. Next thing you know, she's "officially" with that guy she was hanging out with two weeks before you broke up who was "just a friend," and plastering "I love (name)" all over social media.

I've just learned to accept it as "girl code." You don't owe me an explanation, I'm not going to ask for one, maybe we'll hang out sometime, maybe we won't. It's over and that's that.

And they'll get funny about it, too. I remember a gf once who at one point started avoiding me and making excuses. I asked her point-blank if she was breaking up with me and she said yes. Not long after that she was claiming I broke up with her. Um...what?! If you need to leave, fine. I can be friends with you. Lie to me and I'm putting you on my ghost list.

My suggestion is cut her completely out of your life. Liars aren't worth your time, not even as "just friends."


Well you could be right, but you could be wrong. Its not unfathomable that someone could genuinely feel like they have too much going on for a relationship.


_________________
Tis the time to melt the Ice.


cberg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Dec 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,183
Location: A swiftly tilting planet

27 Feb 2017, 3:41 pm

I'm just one hippie but I'm in the habit of trying to de-stigmatize this phrase. Not that I find it's something to be taken lightly, I just think hearing any such thing from me shouldn't have to come as a surprise. Honesty is the best policy, even when it complicates something.


_________________
"Standing on a well-chilled cinder, we see the fading of the suns, and try to recall the vanished brilliance of the origin of the worlds."
-Georges Lemaitre
"I fly through hyperspace, in my green computer interface"
-Gem Tos :mrgreen:


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

27 Feb 2017, 4:53 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
ThisAdamGuy wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
That was... quick. Was she the same oversilent girl?


No, it was someone different. This girl actually made first contact with me, if you can believe it (I have a hard time believing it myself). She was a lot more open and friendly than my last gf. And then yesterday, right out of the blue, I get a text from her saying she's "going to be that person" and we need to break up. She says it's nothing about me, her life is just too crazy and it's "[her] fault for ever thinking [she] could be in a relationship." So yeah, that's that I guess.

Lunella wrote:
Feel better soon.


I'm honestly not that broken up about it. I was a little depressed yesterday, but I'm over it now. I don't think I'm going to try this again, though. I'm better off by myself.

It's worth trying again, though. That's why I insist on not being attached to any one person, at least not right away. You seem to be handling it well. Give it another 3 weeks or so and get back in the saddle. You'll be fine.

Not that this is really helpful, and you probably think I'm just stating the obvious, but your girl is a liar. Maybe things are crazy for her, but the thing about relationships is you can weather anything IAR if it really means something to you. She didn't dump you because her life is crazy. She dumped you because she's not into you.

I hate when people do that, because I instinctively go into fix-it mode. What do you mean your life is crazy? Here, let me help. Talk to me about it and let's see what we can do together. Doesn't mean we have to break up. Except it DOES, because she wants it that way. Next thing you know, she's "officially" with that guy she was hanging out with two weeks before you broke up who was "just a friend," and plastering "I love (name)" all over social media.

I've just learned to accept it as "girl code." You don't owe me an explanation, I'm not going to ask for one, maybe we'll hang out sometime, maybe we won't. It's over and that's that.

And they'll get funny about it, too. I remember a gf once who at one point started avoiding me and making excuses. I asked her point-blank if she was breaking up with me and she said yes. Not long after that she was claiming I broke up with her. Um...what?! If you need to leave, fine. I can be friends with you. Lie to me and I'm putting you on my ghost list.

My suggestion is cut her completely out of your life. Liars aren't worth your time, not even as "just friends."


Well you could be right, but you could be wrong. Its not unfathomable that someone could genuinely feel like they have too much going on for a relationship.

True. lol But I'm not wrong on this! I see what you're trying to do, and I respect that. And I'm devout when it comes to seeing the best in others. But your mistake is trying to apply logic to an irrational context and expecting to be right. It's more psychology than philosophy.

If I were a betting man, I'd give her...oh, let's be generous...6 weeks before she's seeing someone, and that's if it takes more than 2.

I know I'm right on the first count, so let's not go there. I would LOVE to be proven wrong on the second, that is, she intends to start seeing someone in the next 2-6 weeks. If he could cyberstalk her without actually making contact and let us know what info she makes publically available, that would be great. I'm begging to be proven wrong on that.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,096
Location: Sweden

27 Feb 2017, 5:22 pm

The short time rules only apply to NTs. NTs always are so stressed out and impatient over everything, and there is no reason to put any truth to this. For NDs, you can easily change weeks to months, and it would still be true. In my experience, my "minimum" rule is three months, but that's the absolute minimum with no contact whatsoever.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

27 Feb 2017, 5:37 pm

ThisAdamGuy wrote:
I mean, I kind of sympathize with her. Both her adopted parents just went to jail for felonies, and she's just moved in with her real dad for the first time in her life. So yeah, things are pretty crazy for her right now. I don't hold that against her. I just wish she hadn't waited until after we had a relationship to decide she couldn't handle a relationship.

Ouch. I get it. It would be great if you could be there for her and help her heal. If you want to take a chance and be available as a friend, don't let me stop you.

But I think it's a bad idea to get involved. The usual case is that children are condemned to repeating the sins their parents. It's a familiar pattern in human history, enough so you find it in the Old Testament of the Bible. So unless you want to get swept up in her mess, it's best to forget about her.

And I can already see how she's going to turn out simply because she broke up with you. In other words, instead of sharing the burden and letting you walk beside her, she chose her own path. Which she has every right to do, don't get me wrong. She comes from a broken home and has family baggage BESIDES that. And she's making things worse by lying to you. She didn't choose her circumstances, but lying was all on her. Oh, and not reciprocating when you said you love her. Not a good sign.

Watch her at a distance (if you CAN without being noticed, without upsetting her or doing anything illegal) and see if I'm wrong. She's going to end up MAYBE using drugs. She'll have a bf who abuses her that won't let her leave, and maybe even end up a single mom. There is, of course a good chance I'm wrong about that. Let's hope so. Maybe, HOPEFULLY, there is a light at the end of that tunnel. The most important fact we must accept is that light won't be you.

I genuinely mean it when I say hopefully those aweful things won't happen. I'm just seeing an aweful pattern I've seen repeated too many times. I'm not a betting man, but I AM a praying man. The sad reality is prayers are too often all one can offer.

What I CAN say with little doubt is she will have another bf in the near future. I'm interested in this--call it a morbid curiosity if you will. I give it 2 to 6 weeks.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

27 Feb 2017, 5:51 pm

rdos wrote:
The short time rules only apply to NTs. NTs always are so stressed out and impatient over everything, and there is no reason to put any truth to this. For NDs, you can easily change weeks to months, and it would still be true. In my experience, my "minimum" rule is three months, but that's the absolute minimum with no contact whatsoever.

She'll be IAR in 2 to 6 weeks. Don't doubt me.