21 May 2018, 3:21 pm
TheSpectrum wrote:
I'm aware, but this is sadly what the general public think...as far as social media goes.
Just go to any facebook news posts about the royal wedding and you'll see for yourself.
In person no one I know seems to fussed, none of the vitriol like I've seen online.
Just a few comments that the dress could've been prettier
Agreed, it's a great advertisement for the UK!
Just go to any facebook news posts about the royal wedding and you'll see for yourself.
In person no one I know seems to fussed, none of the vitriol like I've seen online.
Just a few comments that the dress could've been prettier
Agreed, it's a great advertisement for the UK!
This is the only post about the Royal Wedding I've had on my feed
Quote:
•Volunteered for 2 tours of Afghanistan.
•Set up Invictus games helping wounded service personal.
° Numerous unpaid charity volunteer appointments all over the world.
•Family brings in 400 million a year in private revenue that under the “ sovereign act 2011” the government keeps £360 million of.
•Family brings in £1.8 billion per year in tourism.
•Country better off by £2.1 billion a year.
Remind me how the wedding is waste of tax payers money ?
° The wedding is paid for by the Royal heritage and private funding not the tax payer and that includes her dress!
° The tax payer will pay for the public security not private security. The same way the tax payer pays for public security at football matches etc.
Dont be a zombie and believe everything you see and read on the Internet, do a little research before sharing propaganda. Like it or not, the Royal family is a British tradition and icon.
Let’s not forget that most the twats complain about spending tax payers money are the ones who sit and sign for that money every Wednesday or daft liberals who haven't got a clue about reality.
•Set up Invictus games helping wounded service personal.
° Numerous unpaid charity volunteer appointments all over the world.
•Family brings in 400 million a year in private revenue that under the “ sovereign act 2011” the government keeps £360 million of.
•Family brings in £1.8 billion per year in tourism.
•Country better off by £2.1 billion a year.
Remind me how the wedding is waste of tax payers money ?
° The wedding is paid for by the Royal heritage and private funding not the tax payer and that includes her dress!
° The tax payer will pay for the public security not private security. The same way the tax payer pays for public security at football matches etc.
Dont be a zombie and believe everything you see and read on the Internet, do a little research before sharing propaganda. Like it or not, the Royal family is a British tradition and icon.
Let’s not forget that most the twats complain about spending tax payers money are the ones who sit and sign for that money every Wednesday or daft liberals who haven't got a clue about reality.
21 May 2018, 3:28 pm
21 May 2018, 3:42 pm
TheSpectrum wrote:
You obviously know smarter people, lol.
I'm going by comment sections from news articles rather than those sharing posts.
Generally the people I know have remained indifferent on the whole affair, or just commented on the dress.
I'm going by comment sections from news articles rather than those sharing posts.
Generally the people I know have remained indifferent on the whole affair, or just commented on the dress.
I haven't fact checked it , it could be mostly bollocks , this was a comment from another poster
21 May 2018, 3:55 pm
21 May 2018, 4:54 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
What's going on among the womensphere these two days? All I am hearing is dissing gossip about Meghan Markle - ie. calling her older and uglier than Prince Harry ..etc
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. 
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. Haha, yes, probably jealousy.
As a man, I can say that Meghan looks very attractive. 
I don't know how old Meghan is, but they look about the same age to me.
21 May 2018, 4:57 pm
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
What's going on among the womensphere these two days? All I am hearing is dissing gossip about Meghan Markle - ie. calling her older and uglier than Prince Harry ..etc
Why All this hate? Jealousy? Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince.
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. womansphere speaking, personally i've been hating on the royal family for years lol i don't see the point of having royalties sponging off people's taxes while everyone make such a big fuss over them. aside from that i think both princesses seem like nice humans n bear no hate x
22 May 2018, 4:55 am
22 May 2018, 7:05 am
22 May 2018, 7:46 am
Gallia wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
What's going on among the womensphere these two days? All I am hearing is dissing gossip about Meghan Markle - ie. calling her older and uglier than Prince Harry ..etc
Why All this hate? Jealousy? Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince.
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. womansphere speaking, personally i've been hating on the royal family for years lol i don't see the point of having royalties sponging off people's taxes while everyone make such a big fuss over them. aside from that i think both princesses seem like nice humans n bear no hate x
22 May 2018, 9:25 am
fluffysaurus wrote:
Gallia wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
What's going on among the womensphere these two days? All I am hearing is dissing gossip about Meghan Markle - ie. calling her older and uglier than Prince Harry ..etc
Why All this hate? Jealousy? Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince.
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. womansphere speaking, personally i've been hating on the royal family for years lol i don't see the point of having royalties sponging off people's taxes while everyone make such a big fuss over them. aside from that i think both princesses seem like nice humans n bear no hate x
it is said that they cost 65 pence per year per person. they own a lot of land and property from inheritance. they don't work (unless you consider a couple of public appearances a year 'work'). yes, they are required ti keep up appearances and some of them try to do charity work but even that's frowned upon within inner royal circles (see Diana). they are ultimately useless and only a tourist attraction.
ps for those who say that they bring in revenue from tourism - i call BS! tourists would still be coming in equal numbers even if the royal family was not around. however, these weddings and special events do bring in some good dough to the bbc and various news agency lol
Last edited by Gallia on 22 May 2018, 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
22 May 2018, 9:27 am
22 May 2018, 1:39 pm
Gallia wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
Gallia wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
What's going on among the womensphere these two days? All I am hearing is dissing gossip about Meghan Markle - ie. calling her older and uglier than Prince Harry ..etc
Why All this hate? Jealousy? Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince.
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. womansphere speaking, personally i've been hating on the royal family for years lol i don't see the point of having royalties sponging off people's taxes while everyone make such a big fuss over them. aside from that i think both princesses seem like nice humans n bear no hate x
it is said that they cost 65 pence per year per person. they own a lot of land and property from inheritance. they don't work (unless you consider a couple of public appearances a year 'work'). yes, they are required ti keep up appearances and some of them try to do charity work but even that's frowned upon within inner royal circles (see Diana). they are ultimately useless and only a tourist attraction.
ps for those who say that they bring in revenue from tourism - i call BS! tourists would still be coming in equal numbers even if the royal family was not around. however, these weddings and special events do bring in some good dough to the bbc and various news agency lol
A COUPLE OF APPEARANCES A YEAR!! ! the Queen carries out over 300 engagements per year, she's in her 90's.
The queen is patron to over 600 charities. Frowned upon in inner royal circles?
Not affect tourism? You don't think the changing of the guard might look a little silly if they were'n guarding anything?
22 May 2018, 1:42 pm
fluffysaurus wrote:
Gallia wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
Gallia wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
What's going on among the womensphere these two days? All I am hearing is dissing gossip about Meghan Markle - ie. calling her older and uglier than Prince Harry ..etc
Why All this hate? Jealousy? Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince.
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. womansphere speaking, personally i've been hating on the royal family for years lol i don't see the point of having royalties sponging off people's taxes while everyone make such a big fuss over them. aside from that i think both princesses seem like nice humans n bear no hate x
it is said that they cost 65 pence per year per person. they own a lot of land and property from inheritance. they don't work (unless you consider a couple of public appearances a year 'work'). yes, they are required ti keep up appearances and some of them try to do charity work but even that's frowned upon within inner royal circles (see Diana). they are ultimately useless and only a tourist attraction.
ps for those who say that they bring in revenue from tourism - i call BS! tourists would still be coming in equal numbers even if the royal family was not around. however, these weddings and special events do bring in some good dough to the bbc and various news agency lol
A COUPLE OF APPEARANCES A YEAR!! ! the Queen carries out over 300 engagements per year, she's in her 90's.
The queen is patron to over 600 charities. Frowned upon in inner royal circles?
I see European royalty generally as a tacky remnant of a bygone era.
22 May 2018, 1:51 pm
RainbowUnion wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
Gallia wrote:
fluffysaurus wrote:
Gallia wrote:
The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
What's going on among the womensphere these two days? All I am hearing is dissing gossip about Meghan Markle - ie. calling her older and uglier than Prince Harry ..etc
Why All this hate? Jealousy? Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince.
Why All this hate? Jealousy?
Every pretty even plain girl now sees herself more worthy than her for a Prince. womansphere speaking, personally i've been hating on the royal family for years lol i don't see the point of having royalties sponging off people's taxes while everyone make such a big fuss over them. aside from that i think both princesses seem like nice humans n bear no hate x
it is said that they cost 65 pence per year per person. they own a lot of land and property from inheritance. they don't work (unless you consider a couple of public appearances a year 'work'). yes, they are required ti keep up appearances and some of them try to do charity work but even that's frowned upon within inner royal circles (see Diana). they are ultimately useless and only a tourist attraction.
ps for those who say that they bring in revenue from tourism - i call BS! tourists would still be coming in equal numbers even if the royal family was not around. however, these weddings and special events do bring in some good dough to the bbc and various news agency lol
A COUPLE OF APPEARANCES A YEAR!! ! the Queen carries out over 300 engagements per year, she's in her 90's.
The queen is patron to over 600 charities. Frowned upon in inner royal circles?
I see European royalty generally as a tacky remnant of a bygone era.
22 May 2018, 1:54 pm
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 44
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,664
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
22 May 2018, 1:57 pm
