Being "sweet" implies a high degree of harmlessness or lack of threat. In other words, someone who comes off as "sweet" also appears nonthreatening. That can be very endearing in a woman. Especially today, when women have the power to change a man's life with a false accusation, controlling personality, or unflattering social media post. So a "sweet" woman puts a man at ease with her nonthreatening demeanor, and by extension, lack of risk in letting her into his life. But it's a double standard: being "sweet" is a kiss of death for a man. Because a man must be able to protect a woman, and for that, the ability to actually be a threat is a must. So, being sweet is a no-no.
Now, three years ago, I met a really sweet girl who I found totally endearing from the get-go. To the point of feeling guilty about dating her, because she came off as innocent and somewhat fragile, while I was already jaded and hardened dating-wise. At that time, my friends got into relationships and no longer wanted to spend time with me. Plus, their girlfriends didn't exactly win me over right away; in fact, I felt ill-at-ease around them until I got to know them better. I felt like they were judging me as a single loser who won't quit tagging along. That girl, on the other hand, somehow won me over in less than an hour on the first meeting, with no special effort on her part. I don't know if it was her younger age (22 compared to my 33), her jumpy conversation style that became endearing once I used to it, her playful personality, or her cute face. But whatever it was, the word "sweet" was a perfect descriptor for her. (Since then, she became my best friend, and I wouldn't have it any other way.)
Last edited by Aspie1 on 12 May 2019, 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.