blue_bean wrote:
What I see of the OP is that she has a special circumstance here where she is not only dealing with unwanted attention, but also dealing with it in combination with the post-trauma of her recent sexual assault (yes, for realz full-blown f***ing rape! explicit enough?). Why are me and Kjas the only people seeing this for what it is?
Er, because you're the only two that see the whole picture, not the half that was presented at the OP?
blue_bean wrote:
This wasn't intended to be a thread about celebrating knocking guys egos, but everyone else in the thread (guys and girls) chimed in and posted as if it was. This was meant to be a thread about dealing with unwanted attention in the context of lingering sexual trauma.
Then put it in the
Women's Discussion FFS!
blue_bean wrote:
Granted not everyone knows the OP and what happened to her so they have reason to miss the true context, but then there were people in this thread who know full well what happened and willfully ignored it.
Bolded part is exactly correct, the other well... are you saying I've read the entire thread and then ignored it?
Wrong.I haven't read the whole thread, nor want to from what I saw first page. But, alas, I await for your apology. Accusing me of deliberately ignoring that which I have not read, is libel.
DialAForAwesome wrote:
OMG, J-Greens. Why the f.....why would you say something like that? *facepalm* Now you just painted all men in a bad light.

Say what? The more you slam a person down the harder they will hit back...you take someone low on confidence and take that last bit away, what's going to happen? A reaction. A bit of
tact and everyone's fine, you rip his heart out, expect a fist in return.
meems wrote:
Still, he's being a jerk.
For what? I didn't have the full picture, I typed in reply to what I saw. I'm being honest, reasonable and fairly restrained, in all fairness to what I read in the initial OP. Being a jerk for having an opinion, that's a new one.