[25+ Age] L & D Forums for High-Functioning Adult AS?

Page 11 of 23 [ 354 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 23  Next

Abangyarudo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 603

27 Dec 2008, 8:26 pm

ephemerella wrote:
LePetitPrince wrote:
ephemerella , you have serious issues, I have issues too ...in fact everyone does, but your issues are way too serious. ...

That's one of the reasons why I shift my profile to female , not only to prove that I have no sense of sexism but also to avoid to be quickly misjudged by people like you on my gender basis. I always wanted to pick "none" as gender in my profile but that's not available.


The fact that women check who is attacking them and that it makes a difference, is because there are abusive males out there who like to hate women, stalk them and other kinds of predators who focus on women. If you aren't black, you don't understand the poisonous motivation that some racists have against blacks. If you aren't an attractive woman, you can't see how many people around you have a hidden side of woman-hating and woman-bashing.

To me, your ongoing (thread-long) attempts to belittle and marginalize my feelings of marginalization sound like those white guys who like to tell black people that racism is not really a problem anymore. Those guys only speak for themselves. They don't speak for the 1 in 20 or 1 in 50 people who will do nasty things to black people when no one else is looking. The fact that you, as a young male, don't get what I'm saying, only means that you have no experience with it. IT is always belittling and marginalizing to take the statement of someone from a discriminated-against class and tell them that you know better than they how to judge their opinions about their status, based on experience that you cannot possess, not being of that class.

The fact that you have a hobby or special interest in arguing against feminists and feminism and are called sexist by those women, reflects your personal issue may be influencing your debating behavior. I would never want to gain a rep for going around arguing with blacks how they don't have the experiences they claim to have or that they are deluded to feel that they have experienced racism just because a while male doesn't see it happening. (1) I wouldn't know because I'm not black and the people who would be acting out against them would not be motivated to show that behavior toward me, and (2) since I'm not able to be affected by racism directly, the only opinions I could have on the subject are those that are based on my own racism.

I'm surprised that you don't see how women might form the opinion that your arguing in these threads against the experiences and opinions of women in subject areas about their own experiences and opinions, is not sexist or motivated by gender bias.

Quote:
And NTs are not bastards like you are picturing them, you are much worse than any NT I personally know.


If I am much worse than any NT you have known, you are very lucky, then.

Quote:
If you think this forum is not to your level because it's dominated by "Average IQ, Immature users and young males" then please do us a favor and leave ephemerella , just leave because you won't be welcomed here.


A lot of people in my demographic have said they love my posts. Doesn't it occur to you that what is not appealing or true to your and your group may be appealing and true to those outside of your world view?

It is one thing to have a world view based on your own experience and perspective in life. But you seem to think in the posts on this thread that your having a clear vision on women's issues based on your own world view means that you can impose that on others who have a completely different experience base. I.e. you don't seem to have any sense that there is a limitation to how valid your opinions and world views can be, when applied to women who have completely different world experiences and makeup than you.

You and others keep talking about the sexism thing going with your profile history as being some kind of joke or lark with you. Is it? It didn't seem that way the way you came after me and have persisted in this thread.

Quote:
You keep check users members to see if they are males and if you don't like their replies to you then you star accusing them of being macho chauvinist male bastards...


I only looked at your profile because something about the way you came at me triggered my interest. I didn't look up the profiles of anyone else on this thread. Just you.

No, after reviewing your posts about women's issues some more I don't get the idea that you are a predator. But I do think that there is something there, some issue of discomfort with women stating their opinions, or some notion that your opinions on women's experience and issues are more valid than theirs, to the point of having a belief that your opinions about them should outweigh theirs.

The OP post obviously said things that were offensive and I have updated the OP post to reflect that I am aware that it was offensive in places.



ok so tell me why you hate descrimination but you've discriminated althrough these threads. Incase you aren't aware young men have made big improvements to the world in general and the younger generation are least likely then older people to hold on to discriminatory views. If you checked years ago there was hardly any interracial relationships now you see them all the time. Women originally weren't provided with the chance to be more than a housewife now they are.

I'm not saying its perfect because unfornatly due to the nature of mankind it never will be. People will hold on to these views whether its because its easier to hold on to them as a tribute to long lost family members, or because of their own experiences with those people. Its kind of ironic you brought up "experiences" because that it what they will always claim as their reasoning.

So instead of combating the problem your discriminating against everyone else so instead of being part of the solution your becoming part of the problem here. Your becoming part of that sector of society that you depise more then the component of initiating change. Your now descriminating using what society doesn't see as wrong. There were people who made great changes with a small IQ and that were young. As my favorite philosopher said "Forgetting one's purpose is the most common form of stupidity."

PS: Experience doesn't = valid opinions if anything it puts more blinders on you. A well balanced opinion is made through taking all factors into account people with experiences cannot let go of the biased nature of their own opinions. I am hispanic and there have been many times that I could have considered things as having a racial undertone while I feel it doesn't if I hold on to those experiences as part of "well racism happened to me." It would blind me from the true making me impartial and unable to make clear distinctions between what is and what is not racism.



Hector
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,493

27 Dec 2008, 8:35 pm

Shiggily wrote:
Or as one of my professors in math told me (yes I am referencing math, I am sorry it applies)... It doesn't matter if you are crazy, gay, straight, white, black, man, woman, or alien... your ideas should stand alone.

It's a nice thought but a naive one. Women are not on level terms with men in most academic disciplines, especially I would think a male-dominated one such as mathematics. That's not to say that sexism is the cause of male dominance in mathematics, I'm sure it's not, but it still poses problems for aspiring or current female mathematicians.
Shiggily wrote:
though that doesn't seem to happen much in today's society. We seem to dismiss ideas based on irrelevant facts about the person offering the ideas. Instead of evaluating the ideas, we evaluate the person.

That's how it's always been. When people have second thoughts about their own judgments of others, such as "am I thinking this because of the colour of his skin", that's good. It's when unfair prejudices are silent and acceptable that they are truly dangerous. All the more reason why "feminism" shouldn't be a dirty word and people should still look out for signs of sexual prejudice, even in the United States.



Abangyarudo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 603

27 Dec 2008, 8:49 pm

Hector wrote:
Shiggily wrote:
Or as one of my professors in math told me (yes I am referencing math, I am sorry it applies)... It doesn't matter if you are crazy, gay, straight, white, black, man, woman, or alien... your ideas should stand alone.

It's a nice thought but a naive one. Women are not on level terms with men in most academic disciplines, especially I would think a male-dominated one such as mathematics. That's not to say that sexism is the cause of male dominance in mathematics, I'm sure it's not, but it still poses problems for aspiring or current female mathematicians.
Shiggily wrote:
though that doesn't seem to happen much in today's society. We seem to dismiss ideas based on irrelevant facts about the person offering the ideas. Instead of evaluating the ideas, we evaluate the person.

That's how it's always been. When people have second thoughts about their own judgments of others, such as "am I thinking this because of the colour of his skin", that's good. It's when unfair prejudices are silent and acceptable that they are truly dangerous. All the more reason why "feminism" shouldn't be a dirty word and people should still look out for signs of sexual prejudice, even in the United States.


on the other side too much vigilance will cause the problem with the op looking for predators and opponents in rather mundance fashion. She leaped from the thought that LPP was just someone who opposed her view to an opponent. I also think there was great mathamaticans who are female whose breakthroughs have been silenced by the scientific community who still wishes to promote that mathamatics are easier for men, the basis of this thought comes from age old gender stereotypes.

A similar thing was done with a female who had made great strides in the beginning film industry most of these accomplishments are given to a male. I forgot the name though.



Airborne
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 157
Location: United States Of America

27 Dec 2008, 10:02 pm

Zane wrote:
Airborne wrote:

Quote:
I keep getting attacked by male virgins and teenaged boys on this site.

Wow thats rude. Im getting attacked by a bitchy, self-pittying, imbelcilic, moron who is uderally sexist and corrupt minded.


Hate to say it bro but you just proved her point :wink:

By making a personal attack on her.

Although we are offended we can not allow ourselves to sink to another persons level.

In fact I personally feel it is by keeping ourselves morally strait (thank you boy scouts) we instead make the other person raise to our level of maturity.

However I used to be more hot headed like you, growing up has allowed me space to step back and annalyze myself and grow accordingly. Still (acording to Miss E) I am only 22 and not "old" enough to make any point worth reading ... even if I am considered an Adult by the entire world and have lost my virginity several times over in my last two relationships :wink:

I wasnt making a pointless personal attack...the truth hurts....Also why does she think every male on here is a virgin? A bit strange ehh? haha



Zane
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 347
Location: Tempe, Arizona

27 Dec 2008, 10:29 pm

Abangyarudo wrote:

A similar thing was done with a female who had made great strides in the beginning film industry most of these accomplishments are given to a male. I forgot the name though.


Dorothy Arzner?

She alone is a very important down played woman from the "golden age" of film. She was the woman who directed "the wild party". A very beautiful and powerful woman who would not let her sexuality or beauty stand in the way of passion and the arts. She directed some of the first "Talkies" and started many famous womens careers including but not exclusive to Katharine Hepburn.

I did my report on her for my women studies class. The class was Women in film. Great class and very informative, I really learned a lot, and ended up hating "white men" a little myself. :lol:

The sad truth about our "european" history is that women have been down played a lot. But that started millions of years ago in the time or Rome and their Catholic empire. All because of Jesus if you ask me but that is a whole other story in itself, I will leave that up to those interested enough to reserch it :wink: .

Men have fearned women for ages mostly because of womb envy and mother issues. However the truth is just because something happend in the past does not mean it has to effect the now. I personally believ in a new era and the next geration theories. I believe we can finally put a stop to biased history and biased opinions and finally step up to the next level of humanity where we all except bad things happened but they are no reason to defend actions in the now. I persoanlly am not proud of anything my ancestors did but would hate to think becaue of it I am stuck to hold onto the chains of despair they laid for me, I believe in breaking the bonds of slavery, both social and political.

Just because men hurt you in past events does not mean all men will in the future. Men have dropped many balls but we are after all Destructive in nature much like women are creative and loving in thiers. I like war, killing, breaking glass, smashing cell phones, and kicking peoples asses. But that does not mean I am not morally strait (thank you boy scouts).

I would write more but this is off topic and might just be throwing gasoline on the fire... :roll:

-Zane


_________________
"The world is dying; time to suit up"


Zane
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 347
Location: Tempe, Arizona

27 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm

:OffTopic:


_________________
"The world is dying; time to suit up"


Last edited by Zane on 30 Dec 2008, 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Shiggily
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,317

27 Dec 2008, 10:57 pm

Hector wrote:
Shiggily wrote:
Or as one of my professors in math told me (yes I am referencing math, I am sorry it applies)... It doesn't matter if you are crazy, gay, straight, white, black, man, woman, or alien... your ideas should stand alone.

It's a nice thought but a naive one. Women are not on level terms with men in most academic disciplines, especially I would think a male-dominated one such as mathematics. That's not to say that sexism is the cause of male dominance in mathematics, I'm sure it's not, but it still poses problems for aspiring or current female mathematicians.
Shiggily wrote:
though that doesn't seem to happen much in today's society. We seem to dismiss ideas based on irrelevant facts about the person offering the ideas. Instead of evaluating the ideas, we evaluate the person.

That's how it's always been. When people have second thoughts about their own judgments of others, such as "am I thinking this because of the colour of his skin", that's good. It's when unfair prejudices are silent and acceptable that they are truly dangerous. All the more reason why "feminism" shouldn't be a dirty word and people should still look out for signs of sexual prejudice, even in the United States.


Part of the unevenness in mathematics is because women are not interested in math. None of my professors were concerned with me being female, though they did comment that it is unusual, since most females do not like math.
If I start a conversation about math and the recipient is male, more often than not they will be slightly more interested in the concepts than if it was a woman. Not sure why, but the coldness, lack of emotion, and austere beauty of mathematics does not seem to appeal to women.

I wish feminism wasn't a dirty word. But is has become so. People should look out for signs of all kinds of prejudices. But I do not think they should try to find things that aren't there to prove their point.



Airborne
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 157
Location: United States Of America

27 Dec 2008, 11:29 pm

Zane wrote:
Airborne wrote:
Zane wrote:
Airborne wrote:

Quote:
I keep getting attacked by male virgins and teenaged boys on this site.

Wow thats rude. Im getting attacked by a bitchy, self-pittying, imbelcilic, moron who is uderally sexist and corrupt minded.


Hate to say it bro but you just proved her point :wink:

By making a personal attack on her.

Although we are offended we can not allow ourselves to sink to another persons level.

In fact I personally feel it is by keeping ourselves morally strait (thank you boy scouts) we instead make the other person raise to our level of maturity.

However I used to be more hot headed like you, growing up has allowed me space to step back and annalyze myself and grow accordingly. Still (acording to Miss E) I am only 22 and not "old" enough to make any point worth reading ... even if I am considered an Adult by the entire world and have lost my virginity several times over in my last two relationships :wink:

I wasnt making a pointless personal attack...the truth hurts....Also why does she think every male on here is a virgin? A bit strange ehh? haha
In my book, all personal attacks are pointless. But that is just me and I am just one person who has an opinion that many respect and others dispise so do whatever you wish. If I were you I would edit the responce and appologize for the insult on character, but liek I said before...that is just me :wink:

Eh..it wasnt a "ZOMG THIS b***h HAS PISSED ME OFF LET ME GO ALL KEYBOARD COMMANDO ON HER ASS WITH MY INSULT BOOK" more like stating the obvious, I have a tendency to uninteltionally insult people who piss me off when Im not intending too... But what she hasnt answered is why she thinks EVERY male that has responded hasnt been in a relationship/is a virgin, it makes me lol that she makes stereotypical assumptions.



Xelebes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

27 Dec 2008, 11:43 pm

An attack can come in many forms and sometimes attacks are unintentional. Make note of that. Sometimes what ou may say is viewed as an affront to another. It is best to soften what you say, in form of apology or some similar tool, to make what you say more palatable to the reader. Communication is a two-way road and when you intend not to attack, you may not always come across that way and must be prepared for that.



Airborne
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 157
Location: United States Of America

28 Dec 2008, 12:05 am

Xelebes wrote:
An attack can come in many forms and sometimes attacks are unintentional. Make note of that. Sometimes what ou may say is viewed as an affront to another. It is best to soften what you say, in form of apology or some similar tool, to make what you say more palatable to the reader. Communication is a two-way road and when you intend not to attack, you may not always come across that way and must be prepared for that.

Not to act "She started it first" or immature but same can be said for the OP.



Shiggily
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,317

28 Dec 2008, 12:07 am

Xelebes wrote:
An attack can come in many forms and sometimes attacks are unintentional. Make note of that. Sometimes what ou may say is viewed as an affront to another. It is best to soften what you say, in form of apology or some similar tool, to make what you say more palatable to the reader. Communication is a two-way road and when you intend not to attack, you may not always come across that way and must be prepared for that.


on the other hand. You cannot control other people and how they react. So says my social communication therapist. You can change yourself only up to a certain point. You cannot change other people, nor should you try. You have to separate what is under your control and what is not. And I do not think you should lose yourself completely trying to please other people, or soften your message so much that it loses its meaning just to make people feel better. You just need to do so with tact.

Under some circumstances people will be upset by a message no matter how it is said. But you should still compromise.



Xelebes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

28 Dec 2008, 12:11 am

Shiggily wrote:
Xelebes wrote:
An attack can come in many forms and sometimes attacks are unintentional. Make note of that. Sometimes what ou may say is viewed as an affront to another. It is best to soften what you say, in form of apology or some similar tool, to make what you say more palatable to the reader. Communication is a two-way road and when you intend not to attack, you may not always come across that way and must be prepared for that.


on the other hand. You cannot control other people and how they react. So says my social communication therapist. You can change yourself only up to a certain point. You cannot change other people, nor should you try. You have to separate what is under your control and what is not. And I do not think you should lose yourself completely trying to please other people, or soften your message so much that it loses its meaning just to make people feel better. You just need to do so with tact.

Under some circumstances people will be upset by a message no matter how it is said. But you should still compromise.


It is not a matter of changing yourself, but being able to adapt to whenever someone responds to what you post as if it were an affront. The way to react to that is to not treat such response as an affront itself and apologise.



Shiggily
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Dec 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,317

28 Dec 2008, 2:03 am

Xelebes wrote:
Shiggily wrote:
Xelebes wrote:
An attack can come in many forms and sometimes attacks are unintentional. Make note of that. Sometimes what ou may say is viewed as an affront to another. It is best to soften what you say, in form of apology or some similar tool, to make what you say more palatable to the reader. Communication is a two-way road and when you intend not to attack, you may not always come across that way and must be prepared for that.


on the other hand. You cannot control other people and how they react. So says my social communication therapist. You can change yourself only up to a certain point. You cannot change other people, nor should you try. You have to separate what is under your control and what is not. And I do not think you should lose yourself completely trying to please other people, or soften your message so much that it loses its meaning just to make people feel better. You just need to do so with tact.

Under some circumstances people will be upset by a message no matter how it is said. But you should still compromise.


It is not a matter of changing yourself, but being able to adapt to whenever someone responds to what you post as if it were an affront. The way to react to that is to not treat such response as an affront itself and apologise.


And I think it depends of what was said (in context) and who the two parties are. Some people are offended by some rather silly things and I am not sure a change is in order. You can say something very innocent and caring to someone and they can take offense to it. In some circumstances apologizing would not be in order. In most circumstances it is in order.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

28 Dec 2008, 1:28 pm

ephemerella wrote:
Artemisia wrote:
On this board, I suspect that fairly academic topics will seem too dry and boring to attract the teenage-boy mindset. At least I would hope so. I think if you present a topic in the same style in which you wrote this post, like-minded people would be inclined to reply.

Years ago, I was on a women's studies list-serv (WMST-L) which was an excellent forum for (email) discussion of the type you seem to be looking for. That may be a good place to start. It's not an Asperger's focus, but quite frankly, a lot of us academic types have a number of Asperger traits if not a full-on expression of Asperger's.

Edited to clarify: I don't think this is a matter of intelligence/IQ, but rather a matter of perspective or style (academic). Teenage boys can be just as intelligent as us old folks. They just express it differently. ;-)


THANKS!! !! !

I think there is mainly discomfort w/my views & lack of understanding for adult female analysis, not real malice.

The young guys who attack me seem very smart & sensitive.

It's that I'm on the "Wrong Planet" & don't fit in. As usual.


expect hostility from young men. we draw it like ants to sugar. don't ask me why. i would like to think that it's more than ignorance and insecurity on their part; that i just don't understand their point of view, and if i did i would be more forgiving of the behavior..... but sadly i have lost so much faith in the young male demographic that i don't think i could say that honestly anymore. most of them are ignorant and dangerously insecure. young, ignorant, insecure men=hostility and danger to intelligent, confident women. i have been targeted for this more times in my life than i care to think about. i have even been assaulted for it. it goes with the territory. you either learn to ignore it and carry on, or you learn how to shut up.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

28 Dec 2008, 1:29 pm

starvingartist wrote:
ephemerella wrote:
Artemisia wrote:
On this board, I suspect that fairly academic topics will seem too dry and boring to attract the teenage-boy mindset. At least I would hope so. I think if you present a topic in the same style in which you wrote this post, like-minded people would be inclined to reply.

Years ago, I was on a women's studies list-serv (WMST-L) which was an excellent forum for (email) discussion of the type you seem to be looking for. That may be a good place to start. It's not an Asperger's focus, but quite frankly, a lot of us academic types have a number of Asperger traits if not a full-on expression of Asperger's.

Edited to clarify: I don't think this is a matter of intelligence/IQ, but rather a matter of perspective or style (academic). Teenage boys can be just as intelligent as us old folks. They just express it differently. ;-)


THANKS!! !! !

I think there is mainly discomfort w/my views & lack of understanding for adult female analysis, not real malice.

The young guys who attack me seem very smart & sensitive.

It's that I'm on the "Wrong Planet" & don't fit in. As usual.


expect hostility from young men. we draw it like ants to sugar. don't ask me why. i would like to think that it's more than ignorance and insecurity on their part; that i just don't understand their point of view, and if i did i would be more forgiving of the behavior..... but sadly i have lost so much faith in the young male demographic that i don't think i could say that honestly anymore. most of them are ignorant and dangerously insecure. young, ignorant, insecure men=hostility and danger to intelligent, confident women. i have been targeted for this more times in my life than i care to think about. i have even been assaulted for it. it goes with the territory. you either learn to ignore it and carry on, or you learn how to shut up.



i realise how cynical this will look to most (and does to me, as well).....and yet, this is my experience of the situation. take it as you will.



starvingartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,032

28 Dec 2008, 1:42 pm

CerebralDreamer wrote:
If you bug Alex enough, I'm sure he might give us an extra 'academia' forum, with some extra-stringent rules to deal with 'immaturity'. Basically, sit there discussing theoretical stuff all day, of the nature it seems you're looking for. It would work well I think, if it could get off the ground.


i think this is an excellent idea! if someone starts a "petition" to start a new category of academic forum i would sign it :)