06 Apr 2009, 9:35 pm
hartzofspace wrote:
http://www.heartless-bitches.com/rants/niceguys/nice2.shtml
I posted the same thing
hartzofspace
Supporting Member
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,138
Location: On the Road Less Traveled
06 Apr 2009, 9:36 pm
Kilroy wrote:
hartzofspace wrote:
http://www.heartless-bitches.com/rants/niceguys/nice2.shtml
I posted the same thing
Really? I take it that you agree with the article?
06 Apr 2009, 9:43 pm
hartzofspace
Supporting Member
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,138
Location: On the Road Less Traveled
06 Apr 2009, 11:38 pm
Well, 2 of the same posts can't hurt; more people will see it. 
07 Apr 2009, 10:50 pm
hartzofspace wrote:
http://www.heartless-bitches.com/rants/niceguys/nice2.shtml
Excellent.
08 Apr 2009, 2:23 pm
hartzofspace
Supporting Member
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,138
Location: On the Road Less Traveled
08 Apr 2009, 5:56 pm
archdude wrote:
Kilroy and hartzofspace wrote:
http://www.heartless-bitches.com/rants/niceguys/ng.shtml
That's an interesting site, but I don't think it gives the complete picture. For a different point of view see http://www.laddertheory.com/ A lot of it seems like a joke but it does contain some nuggets of truth. I think the whole truth is somewhere between the two viewpoints presented by "Heartless b*****s" and "The Ladder Theory."
That's very interesting.
AussieAspie36
Tufted Titmouse
Joined: 3 Apr 2009
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 48
Location: Brisbane Australia
17 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
18 Apr 2009, 6:41 pm
18 Apr 2009, 11:12 pm
22 Apr 2009, 10:17 am
22 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
22 Apr 2009, 5:31 pm
22 Apr 2009, 6:27 pm
22 Apr 2009, 6:36 pm
pbcoll wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me how socially acceptable misandry is.
In the very window I'm using for this reply, the word "misandry" has a red dotted line beneath it. Why? Because the spellchecker hasn't been programmed to acknowledge that misandry exists. There's one example of that you mean, pbcoll.
However, two wrongs don't make a right. We males have to be on our guard against becoming mysogynistic. I'm not to proud of having made sweeping generalisations, especially in the face of evidence proving them to be unfounded.
22 Apr 2009, 7:04 pm
MissConstrue wrote:
Uh no...in fact I know some guys here that're not like that even in other sites. In fact, in most of my posts I've been careful not to generalize guys the way most of the posts do about women and yet I still manage to piss the majority off.
Well, I was going on the specific post I quoted - you were agreeing to a universal generalisation.
Quote:
I've known better sites even with guys in them that didn't act this weird about women posting.
? I object to all of us getting tarred with the same brush, I have nothing against women posting - in fact some of my favourite members are women.
BPalmer wrote:
pbcoll wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me how socially acceptable misandry is.
In the very window I'm using for this reply, the word "misandry" has a red dotted line beneath it. Why? Because the spellchecker hasn't been programmed to acknowledge that misandry exists. There's one example of that you mean, pbcoll.
However, two wrongs don't make a right. We males have to be on our guard against becoming mysogynistic.
True.
Quote:
I'm not to proud of having made sweeping generalisations, especially in the face of evidence proving them to be unfounded.
I make negative generalisations about both genders, but I don't think I make many universal ones - I think most people of either gender are shallow, vapid and selfish, so depending on which gender I'm talking about I could easily come accross as really misogynistic or really misandrous. But I try to stay away from saying 'all' because it is neither true nor fair.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| What´s your opinion on Love On The Specttrum? |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm Guest
|
| What´s your opinion on Love On The Specttrum? |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm Guest
|
| What´s your opinion on Love On The Specttrum? |
Yesterday, 9:34 am |
